Research on neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NAI) is increasingly focusing on immunotherapy-related adverse events (AEs). However, many unknowns remain in this field. Hence, through the machine learning (ML)-driven informatics analysis, this study aimed to profile the global decade-long scientific landscape of AEs of NAI and further reveal its critical issues and directions that deserve deeper exploration. During the past decade, the amount of research in the field of NAI safety has displayed a positive trend (annual growth rate: 30.2%), and it has achieved good global collaboration (international coauthorship: 17.43%). Using an unsupervised clustering algorithm, we identified six dominant research clusters, among which Cluster 1 (standardizing response assessment criteria for NAI to minimize its adverse reactions; average citation=34.86±95.48) had the highest impact and Cluster 6 (efficacy and safety of multiple therapy patterns combination) was an emerging research cluster (temporal central tendency=2022.43, research effort dispersion=0.52), with “irAEs” (s=0.4242 (95% CI: 0.01142 to 0.8371), R²=0.4125, p=0.0453), “ICIs” (immune checkpoint inhibitors) (s=1.127 (95% CI: 0.5403 to 1.714), R²=0.7103, p=0.0022), and “efficacy and safety” (s=0.5455 (95% CI: 0.1145 to 0.9764), R²=0.5157, p=0.0193) showing significant overall growth. More importantly, further hotspot burst analysis indicated “ICI” and “efficacy and safety” as the emerging research focuses, demonstrating that scholars in the field are increasingly aware of the importance of balancing NAI efficacy and safety. In conclusion, this study presents ML-derived evidence that outlines the safety challenges of NAI and highlights the importance of balancing its efficacy and safety for its application in patients with perioperative cancer.

Nrf2, an essential and fascinating transcription factor, enjoys a dual property in the occurrence and development of inflammation and cancer. For over two decades, numerous studies regarding Nrf2 in cancer have been reported, whereas there is still a lack of a scientometrics and visualization analysis of Nrf2 in cancer. Hence, a scientometric study regarding the oxidative stress modulator Nrf2 was implemented. After the quality screening, we defined 7168 relevant studies from 2000 to 2021. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, R software, and GraphPad Prism were used for the following scientometric study and visualization analysis, including field profiles, research hotspots, and future predictions. The total number of publications and citations are 1058 and 54,690, respectively. After polynomial fitting curve analysis, two prediction functions of the annual publication number (y = 3.3909x² - 13585x + 1 E+07) and citation number (185.45x² - 743669x + 7 E+08) were generated. After scientometric analysis, we found that Biochemistry Molecular Biology correlates with Nrf2 in cancer highly, and Free Radical Biology and Medicine is a good choice for submitting Nrf2-related manuscripts. The current research hotspots of Nrf2 in cancer mainly focus on cancer therapy and its cellular and molecular mechanisms. "antioxidant response element (87.5)", "gene expression (43.98)", "antioxidant responsive element (21.14)", "chemoprevention (20.05)", "carcinogenesis (19.2)", "cancer chemoprevention (18.45)", "free radical (17.15)", "response element (14.17)", and "chemopreventive agent (14.04)" are important for cancer therapy study. In addition, "glutathione-S-transferase (47)", "keap1 (15.39)", and "heme oxygenase 1 gene (24.35)" are important for inflammation and cell fate study. More interestingly, by performing an "InfoMap" algorithm, the thematic map showed that the "immune response" is essential to oxidative stress modulator Nrf2 but not well developed, indicating it deserves further exploration. This study revealed field profiles, research hotspots, and future directions of oxidative stress modulator Nrf2 in inflammation and cancer research, and our findings will offer a vigorous roadmap for further studies in this field.