Background. Several series predicting the prognosis of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) have been published, but some of their conclusions are controversial. At present, little is known regarding the efficacy of the different antibiotics that are used or their ability to eliminate methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection. Methods. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of cases of PJI by S. aureus that were managed with DAIR (2003–2010). Cases were classified as failures when infection persistence/relapse, death, need for salvage therapy, or prosthesis removal occurred. The parameters that predicted failure were analyzed with logistic and Cox regression. Results. Out of 345 episodes (41% men, 73 years), 81 episodes were caused by MRSA. Fifty-two were hematogenous, with poorer prognoses, and 88% were caused by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Antibiotics were used for a median of 93 days, with similar use of rifampin-based combinations in MSSA- and MRSA-PJI. Failure occurred in 45% of episodes, often early after debridement. The median survival time was 1257 days. There were no overall prognostic differences between MSSA- and MRSA-PJI, but there was a higher incidence of MRSA-PJI treatment failure during the period of treatment (HR 2.34), while there was a higher incidence of MSSA-PJI treatment failure after therapy. Rifampin-based combinations exhibited an independent protective effect. Other independent predictors of outcome were polymicrobial, inflammatory, and bacteremic infections requiring more than 1 debridement, immunosuppressive therapy, and the exchange of removable components of the prosthesis. Conclusions. This is the largest series of PJI by S. aureus managed with DAIR reported to date. The success rate was 55%. The use of rifampin may have contributed to homogenizing MSSA and MRSA prognoses, although the specific rifampin combinations may have had different efficacies.

Clostridium difficile is the most frequently identified enteric pathogen in patients with nosocomially acquired, antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The drugs most commonly used to treat diseases associated with C. difficile are metronidazole and vancomycin. Most clinical laboratories assume that all C. difficile isolates are susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. We report on the antimicrobial susceptibilities of 415 C. difficile isolates to metronidazole and vancomycin over an 8-year period (1993 to 2000). The overall rate of resistance to metronidazole at the critical breakpoint (16 μg/ml) was 6.3%. Although full resistance to vancomycin was not observed, the overall rate of intermediate resistance was 3.1%. One isolate had a combination of resistance to metronidazole and intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Rates of resistance to metronidazole and vancomycin were higher among isolates from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Molecular typing methods proved the absence of clonality among the isolates with decreased susceptibilities to the antimicrobials tested.

The etiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires the isolation of microorganisms from periprosthetic samples. Microbiological cultures often yield false-positive and false-negative results. 16S rRNA gene PCR combined with sequencing (16SPCR) has proven useful for diagnosing various infections. We performed a prospective study to compare the utility of this approach with that of culture to diagnose PJI using intraoperative periprosthetic samples. We analyzed 176 samples from 40 patients with PJI and 321 samples from 82 noninfected patients using conventional culture and 16SPCR. Three statistical studies were undertaken following a previously validated mathematical model: sample-to-sample analysis, calculation of the number of samples to be studied, and calculation of the number of positive samples necessary to diagnose PJI. When only the number of positive samples is taken into consideration, a 16SPCR-positive result in one sample has good specificity and positive predictive value for PJI (specificity, 96.3%; positive predictive value, 91.7%; and likelihood ratio [LR], 22), while 3 positive cultures with the same microorganism are necessary to achieve similar specificity. The best combination of results for 16SPCR was observed when 5 samples were studied and the same microorganism was detected in 2 of them (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 100%; and LR, 69.62). The results for 5 samples with 2 positive cultures were 96% and 82%, respectively, and the likelihood ratio was 1.06. 16SPCR is more specific and has a better positive predictive value than culture for diagnosis of PJI. A positive 16SPCR result is largely suggestive of PJI, even when few samples are analyzed; however, culture is generally more sensitive.

Recent expert reviews recommend a conservative surgical strategy – debridement and irrigation, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) – for most early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, differences exist in published series regarding success rates with DAIR, and the size of most series is small. In this prospective multicenter cohort study of early PJI managed by DAIR, factors associated with failure of the DAIR were analyzed. Out of 139 early PJI, 117 cases managed with DAIR were studied For 67 patients (57.3%), infection was cured and the implant was salvaged with definite antimicrobial therapy. In 35 (29.9%) DAIR failed and removal of the prosthesis was necessary during follow-up. Finally, 15 patients (12.8%) needed chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy due to suspected or confirmed persistent infection. Infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (72.7% failed; p 0.05) and those treated at one of the hospitals (80.0% failed; p <0.05) had worse outcomes, but only this last variable was associated with treatment failure following multivariate analysis. Seventy-four per cent of patients who were successfully treated by DAIR and only 32.7% of the failures were able to walk without help or with one stick at the last follow-up visit (p <0.05). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients with an early PJI may be successfully treated with DAIR and definite antimicrobial therapy. In more than half of these, the infection can be cured. Since identification of factors associated with failure of DAIR is not simple, we recommend offering DAIR to most patients with early PJI.

“The higher the volume of blood cultured the higher the yield of blood cultures” has been a well-accepted dictum since J. A. Washington II performed his classic work. This rule has not been questioned in the era of highly automated blood culture machines, nor has it been correlated with clinical variables. Our objective in this study was to complete a prospective analysis of the relationship between blood volume, the yield of blood cultures, and the severity of clinical conditions in adult patients with suspected bloodstream infections (BSI). During a 6-month period, random samples of blood cultures were weighed to determine the volume of injected blood (weight/density). Overall, 298 patients with significant BSI and 303 patients with sepsis and negative blood cultures were studied. The mean volume of blood cultured in patients with BSI (30.03 ± 14.96 ml [mean ± standard deviation]) was lower than in patients without BSI (32.98 ± 15.22 ml [P= 0.017]), and more episodes of bacteremia were detected with 40 ml (40.2%) of blood cultured (P= 0.022). When patients were stratified according to the severity of their underlying condition, patients with BSI had higher APACHE II scores, and higher APACHE II scores were related to lower sample volumes (P< 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that in the group of patients with APACHE II scores of ≥18, higher volumes yielded higher rates of bacteremia (odds ratio, 1.04 per ml of blood; 95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.08). We conclude that the higher yield of blood cultures inoculated with lower volumes of blood reflects the conditions of the population cultured. Washington's dictum holds true today in the era of automated blood culture machines.

Background. The impact of how positive blood culture results are reported on the evolution bloodstream infections (BSIs) has not been assessed.Method