Flavonoids represent an important group of bioactive compounds derived from plant-based foods and beverages with known biological activity in cells. From the modulation of inflammation to the inhibition of cell proliferation, flavonoids have been described as important therapeutic adjuvants against several diseases, including diabetes, arteriosclerosis, neurological disorders, and cancer. Cancer is a complex and multifactor disease that has been studied for years however, its prevention is still one of the best known and efficient factors impacting the epidemiology of the disease. In the molecular and cellular context, some of the mechanisms underlying the oncogenesis and the progression of the disease are understood, known as the hallmarks of cancer. In this text, we review important molecular signaling pathways, including inflammation, immunity, redox metabolism, cell growth, autophagy, apoptosis, and cell cycle, and analyze the known mechanisms of action of flavonoids in cancer. The current literature provides enough evidence supporting that flavonoids may be important adjuvants in cancer therapy, highlighting the importance of healthy and balanced diets to prevent the onset and progression of the disease.

The COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), severely affects mainly individuals with pre-existing comorbidities. Here our aim was to correlate the mTOR (mammalian/mechanistic Target of Rapamycin) and autophagy pathways with the disease severity. Through western blotting and RNA analysis, we found increased mTOR signaling and suppression of genes related to autophagy, lysosome, and vesicle fusion in Vero E6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 as well as in transcriptomic data mining of bronchoalveolar epithelial cells from severe COVID-19 patients. Immunofluorescence co-localization assays also indicated that SARS-CoV-2 colocalizes within autophagosomes but not with a lysosomal marker. Our findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 can benefit from compromised autophagic flux and inhibited exocytosis in individuals with chronic hyperactivation of mTOR signaling.

NEK6 is a central kinase in developing castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the pathways regulated by NEK6 in CRPC are still unclear. Cancer cells have high reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and easily adapt to this circumstance and avoid cell death by increasing antioxidant defenses. We knocked out the NEK6 gene and evaluated the redox state and DNA damage response in DU-145 cells. The knockout of NEK6 decreases the clonogenic capacity, proliferation, cell viability, and mitochondrial activity. Targeting the NEK6 gene increases the level of intracellular ROS; decreases the expression of antioxidant defenses (SOD1, SOD2, and PRDX3); increases JNK phosphorylation, a stress-responsive kinase; and increases DNA damage markers (p-ATM and γH2AX). The exogenous overexpression of NEK6 also increases the expression of these same antioxidant defenses and decreases γH2AX. The depletion of NEK6 also induces cell death by apoptosis and reduces the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein. NEK6-lacking cells have more sensitivity to cisplatin. Additionally, NEK6 regulates the nuclear localization of NF-κB2, suggesting NEK6 may regulate NF-κB2 activity. Therefore, NEK6 alters the redox balance, regulates the expression of antioxidant proteins and DNA damage, and its absence induces the death of DU-145 cells. NEK6 inhibition may be a new strategy for CRPC therapy.

Background/Objectives: Lung cancer ranks as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally and is highly associated with cisplatin resistance due to both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) plays a critical role in molecular processes, such as DNA replication and repair, chromatin structure maintenance, and cell cycle progression. PCNA is known as a molecular marker for proliferation and an excellent inhibition target to shut down highly proliferative cells. One of the mechanisms of cisplatin resistance is the increase in DNA repair, and studies have reported an association between PCNA, lung cancer, and cisplatin treatment. The present study aimed to characterize the absence of PCNA in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells. Methods: Employing a CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing approach, we generated a monoclonal cell culture, termed PKO (PCNA knockout). Results: PKO cells exhibited a residual PCNA expression, significantly decreased clonogenic potential and ubiquitylation at K164 residue. IC50 assay suggested that PKO cells could not acquire cisplatin resistance when compared to PX. After cisplatin treatment, PKO cells presented impaired ubiquitylation and did not have increased STAT3 phosphorylation (Tyr705), a previously characterized mechanism of cisplatin resistance. Conclusions: We suggest that PCNA participates in cisplatin resistance in A549, partially by DNA damage tolerance through failure on PCNA monoubiquitylation, and its inhibition may be an approach to circumvent cisplatin resistance.