Thymic epithelial tumours (TETs) represent a rare disease, yet they are the most common tumours of the anterior mediastinum. Due to the rare occurrence of TETs, evidence on optimal treatment is limited. Surgery is the treatment of choice in the management of TETs, while the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains unresolved. PORT remains debated for thymomas, especially in completely resected stage II tumours, for which PORT may be more likely to benefit in the presence of aggressive histology (WHO subtype B2, B3) or extensive transcapsular invasion (Masaoka-Koga stage IIB). For stage III thymoma, evidence suggests an overall survival (OS) benefit for PORT after complete resection. For incompletely resected thymomas stage II or higher PORT is recommended. Thymic carcinomas at any stage with positive resection margins should be offered PORT. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of unresectable locally advanced TETs. Induction therapy (chemotherapy or chemoradiation) followed by surgery may be useful for locally advanced thymic malignancies initially considered as unresectable. Chemotherapy only is offered in patients with unresectable, metastatic tumours in palliative intent, checkpoint inhibitors may be promising for refractory diseases. Due to the lack of high-level evidence and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, TETs should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team and the final recommendation should reflect individual patient preferences.

Introduction: Over the past two decades, cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC has improved outcomes for selected patients with peritoneal metastasis from various origins. This is a cross-sectional study with descriptive analyses of HIPEC trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. This study aimed to characterize clinical trials on HIPEC registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the primary objective of identifying a trial focus and to examine whether trial results were published. Methods: The search included trials registered from 1 January 2001 to 14 March 2022. We examined the associations of exposure variables and other trial features with two primary outcomes: therapeutic focus and results reporting. Results: In total, 234 clinical trials were identified; 26 (11%) were already published, and 15 (6%) trials have reported their results but have not been published as full papers. Among ongoing nonpublished trials, 81 (39%) were randomized, 30 (14%) were blinded, n = 39 (20%) were later phase trials (i.e., phases 3 and 4), n = 152 (73%) were from a single institution, and 91 (44%) had parallel groups. Most of the trials were recruiting at the time of this analysis (75, 36%), and 39 (20%) were completed but had yet to publish results. In total, 68% of the trials focused on treatment strategies, and 53% investigated the oncological outcome. The most studied neoplasms for HIPEC trials were peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer (32%), gastric cancer (29%), and ovarian cancer (26%). Twenty different drugs were analyzed in these clinical trials. Conclusions: Many study results are awaited from ongoing HIPEC trials. Most HIPEC trials focused on gastric, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. Many clinical trials were identified involving multiple entities and chemotherapeutic agents.

Background: For patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node involvement (pN2), the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care. The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is controversial. Methods: We describe the current literature focusing on the role of PORT in completely resected NSCLC patients with pN2 involvement and reflect on its role in current guidelines. Results: Based on the results of the recent Lung ART and PORT-C trials, the authors conclude that PORT cannot be generally recommended for all resected pN2 NSCLC patients. A substantial decrease in the locoregional relapse rate without translating into a survival benefit suggests that some patients with risk factors might benefit from PORT. This must be balanced against the risk of cardiopulmonary toxicity with potentially associated mortality. Lung ART has already changed the decision making for the use of PORT in daily practice for many European lung cancer experts, with lower rates of recommendations for PORT overall. Conclusions: PORT is still used, albeit decreasingly, for completely resected NSCLC with pN2 involvement. High-level evidence for its routine use is lacking. Further analyses are required to identify patients who would potentially benefit from PORT.