Jos Jonkers

Prof. Jos Jonkers

Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

38Years (1989-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Taobo HuTaobo Hu
Taobo Hu
LALauri A. Aaltonen
Lauri A. Aaltonen
FAFederico Abascal
Federico Abascal
AAAdam Abeshouse
Adam Abeshouse
HAHiroyuki Aburatani
Hiroyuki Aburatani
CMChristian von Mering
Christian von Mering
Cancer is driven by genetic change, and the advent of massively parallel sequencing has enabled systematic documentation of this variation at the whole-genome scale1–3. Here we report the integrative analysis of 2,658 whole-cancer genomes and their matching normal tissues across 38 tumour types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We describe the generation of the PCAWG resource, facilitated by international data sharing using compute clouds. On average, cancer genomes contained 4–5 driver mutations when combining coding and non-coding genomic elements; however, in around 5% of cases no drivers were identified, suggesting that cancer driver discovery is not yet complete. Chromothripsis, in which many clustered structural variants arise in a single catastrophic event, is frequently an early event in tumour evolution; in acral melanoma, for example, these events precede most somatic point mutations and affect several cancer-associated genes simultaneously. Cancers with abnormal telomere maintenance often originate from tissues with low replicative activity and show several mechanisms of preventing telomere attrition to critical levels. Common and rare germline variants affect patterns of somatic mutation, including point mutations, structural variants and somatic retrotransposition. A collection of papers from the PCAWG Consortium describes non-coding mutations that drive cancer beyond those in the TERT promoter4; identifies new signatures of mutational processes that cause base substitutions, small insertions and deletions and structural variation5,6; analyses timings and patterns of tumour evolution7; describes the diverse transcriptional consequences of somatic mutation on splicing, expression levels, fusion genes and promoter activity8,9; and evaluates a range of more-specialized features of cancer genomes8,10–18.

2 May 2016 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSerena Nik-Zainal
Serena Nik-Zainal
HDHelen Davies
Helen Davies
JSJohan Staaf
Johan Staaf
MRManasa Ramakrishna
Manasa Ramakrishna
DGDominik Glodzik
Dominik Glodzik
MSMichael R. Stratton
Michael R. Stratton
We analysed whole-genome sequences of 560 breast cancers to advance understanding of the driver mutations conferring clonal advantage and the mutational processes generating somatic mutations. We found that 93 protein-coding cancer genes carried probable driver mutations. Some non-coding regions exhibited high mutation frequencies, but most have distinctive structural features probably causing elevated mutation rates and do not contain driver mutations. Mutational signature analysis was extended to genome rearrangements and revealed twelve base substitution and six rearrangement signatures. Three rearrangement signatures, characterized by tandem duplications or deletions, appear associated with defective homologous-recombination-based DNA repair: one with deficient BRCA1 function, another with deficient BRCA1 or BRCA2 function, the cause of the third is unknown. This analysis of all classes of somatic mutation across exons, introns and intergenic regions highlights the repertoire of cancer genes and mutational processes operating, and progresses towards a comprehensive account of the somatic genetic basis of breast cancer.

1 September 2014 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHManuel Hidalgo
Manuel Hidalgo
FAFrédéric Amant
Frédéric Amant
ABAndrew V Biankin
Andrew V Biankin
EBEva Budinská
Eva Budinská
ABAnnette T Byrne
Annette T Byrne
AVAlberto Villanueva
Alberto Villanueva
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the development and characterization of patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models for cancer research. PDX models mostly retain the principal histologic and genetic characteristics of their donor tumor and remain stable across passages. These models have been shown to be predictive of clinical outcomes and are being used for preclinical drug evaluation, biomarker identification, biologic studies, and personalized medicine strategies. This article summarizes the current state of the art in this field, including methodologic issues, available collections, practical applications, challenges and shortcomings, and future directions, and introduces a European consortium of PDX models. Significance: PDX models are increasingly used in translational cancer research. These models are useful for drug screening, biomarker development, and the preclinical evaluation of personalized medicine strategies. This review provides a timely overview of the key characteristics of PDX models and a detailed discussion of future directions in the field. Cancer Discov; 4(9); 998–1013. ©2014 AACR.

30 March 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSeth B. Coffelt
Seth B. Coffelt
KKKelly Kersten
Kelly Kersten
CDChris W. Doornebal
Chris W. Doornebal
JWJorieke Weiden
Jorieke Weiden
KVKim Vrijland
Kim Vrijland
KVKarin E de Visser
Karin E de Visser
Tumours maximize their chance of metastasizing by evoking a systemic inflammatory cascade in mouse models of spontaneous breast cancer metastasis. That tumorigenesis can be closely linked to an inflammatory microenvironment has been well established. In a new study, Karin de Visser and colleagues estimate the more systemic inflammatory effects observed in a mouse model of breast cancer. They find that interleukin (IL)-1β expression in tumours elicits IL-17 expression in γδ T cells at a local level, which through granulocyte colony-stimulating factor production promotes systemic accumulation of neutrophils in multiple organs. Interfering with this cascade of events, for example at the level of neutrophil activation, reduces lung and lymph node metastases in this breast cancer model. These findings illustrate the perhaps wider than anticipated systemic effects elicited by localized tumours, at the same time offering multiple points of potential therapeutic interference. Metastatic disease remains the primary cause of death for patients with breast cancer. The different steps of the metastatic cascade rely on reciprocal interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment. Within this local microenvironment and in distant organs, immune cells and their mediators are known to facilitate metastasis formation1,2. However, the precise contribution of tumour-induced systemic inflammation to metastasis and the mechanisms regulating systemic inflammation are poorly understood. Here we show that tumours maximize their chance of metastasizing by evoking a systemic inflammatory cascade in mouse models of spontaneous breast cancer metastasis. We mechanistically demonstrate that interleukin (IL)-1β elicits IL-17 expression from gamma delta (γδ) T cells, resulting in systemic, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-dependent expansion and polarization of neutrophils in mice bearing mammary tumours. Tumour-induced neutrophils acquire the ability to suppress cytotoxic T lymphocytes carrying the CD8 antigen, which limit the establishment of metastases. Neutralization of IL-17 or G-CSF and absence of γδ T cells prevents neutrophil accumulation and downregulates the T-cell-suppressive phenotype of neutrophils. Moreover, the absence of γδ T cells or neutrophils profoundly reduces pulmonary and lymph node metastases without influencing primary tumour progression. Our data indicate that targeting this novel cancer-cell-initiated domino effect within the immune system—the γδ T cell/IL-17/neutrophil axis—represents a new strategy to inhibit metastatic disease.

14 January 2019 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNorman Sachs
Norman Sachs
APAngelos Papaspyropoulos
Angelos Papaspyropoulos
DODomenique D Zomer‐Van Ommen
Domenique D Zomer‐Van Ommen
IHInha Heo
Inha Heo
LBLena Böttinger
Lena Böttinger
Hans CleversHans Clevers
Hans Clevers
EMBO Press is an editorially independent publishing platform for the development of EMBO scientific publications.

5 November 2001 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJos Jonkers
Jos Jonkers
RMRalph Meuwissen
Ralph Meuwissen
HGHanneke van der Gulden
Hanneke van der Gulden
HPHans Peterse
Hans Peterse
MVMartin van der Valk
Martin van der Valk
ABAnton Berns
Anton Berns