BACKGROUND Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare hypersensitivity reaction involving the skin and various visceral organs; the kidneys are the second most affected organ. Many drugs are reported to be associated with DRESS, particularly antiepileptic agents and allopurinol. Certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, in combination with a particular drug, can further contribute to an increased risk of DRESS. Symptoms often develop 2 to 8 weeks after drug initiation. If diagnosis is delayed, DRESS can be a life-threatening condition. CASE REPORT We present cases of 2 patients. The first patient was an 86-year-old Polish woman who developed acute kidney injury and skin lesions with accompanying leucocytosis and eosinophilia during long-term antibiotic therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin. The second patient was a 37-year-old Asian woman with predialysis chronic renal disease stage V in the course of IgA nephropathy. Two weeks after starting allopurinol in a standard dose, she presented with maculopapular rash, facial edema, fever, liver injury, and eosinophilia. Renal function started to deteriorate, but she did not require dialysis. In both cases, the discontinuation of the above-mentioned drugs and the introduction of steroid therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins allowed for clinical improvement and recovery. In the second case, the extended 4-locus HLA typing was performed retrospectively, and allele HLA-B*5801 was found. CONCLUSIONS Due to the rare occurrence and heterogeneous manifestation of DRESS, its diagnosis can pose many difficulties. In-depth analysis of symptoms, medicines taken, and laboratory findings enable the implementation of appropriate treatment and recovery.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease triggered by dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway, consisting of a characteristic triad of nonimmune hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure. The risk of aHUS onset, recurrence, and allograft loss depends on the genetic background of a patient. We show a series of cases from a single family whose five members were affected by aHUS and presented distinct clinical outcomes. Next-generation sequencing revealed combined mutations in both complement factor H and membrane cofactor protein CD46. Out of eight siblings, aHUS affected three adult brothers, and, subsequently, affected two children of an unaffected sister. The first patient died due to aHUS, and two other brothers underwent successful kidney transplantation with no aHUS recurrence. The younger, 10-month-old child presented with a severe course of the disease with cardiac involvement and persistent hemolytic anemia limited by eculizumab, while the 2-year-old recovered completely on eculizumab. The study shows a highly variable disease penetrance.

Background. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic fungal infection that, in immunocompromised patients, can progress to respiratory failure and death. Since trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) chemoprophylaxis has become a standard management, the prognosis has improved. However, there are patients with a history of TMP/SMX intolerance who cannot receive chemoprophylaxis. Background. We report on a 53-year-old male liver recipient treated with a standard triple immunosuppressive regimen in whom TMP/SMX was waived because of a history of allergy manifested as a generalized rash with edema more than 30 years ago. At transplantation, the immunologic risk was assessed as low, and liver graft function was normal. In the third month after engraftment, he developed dyspnea at rest required constant passive oxygen therapy. Ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and clindamycin were implemented. Mycophenolate acid was stopped, and tacrolimus was reduced. High-resolution computed tomography revealed interstitial pneumonia. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumoniae was diagnosed from bronchoalveolar lavage. Instead of TMP/SMX, pentamidine and caspofungin were also used for PJP, with no improvement. After 3 weeks, the patient deteriorated. Because of his life-threatening condition, TMP/SMX was introduced in the sulfonamide desensitization protocol, including hydrocortisone and clemastinum. Within 4 days, the patient stabilized with no signs of TMP/SMX intolerance. Pneumonia subsided within a month, and TMP/SMX was prescribed lifelong. Conclusions. Prophylaxis for PJP with TMP/SMX still remains an important issue in transplant recipients. Adverse reaction to TMP/SMX in the past is not always a contraindication to reintroducing prophylaxis. The decision of prophylaxis avoidance should be analyzed carefully; in uncertain cases, a sulfonamide desensitization protocol should be considered.