Sungmin Woo

Dr. Sungmin Woo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 September 2015 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HVH. A. Vargas
H. A. Vargas
AHA. M. Hötker
A. M. Hötker
DGD. A. Goldman
D. A. Goldman
CMC. S. Moskowitz
C. S. Moskowitz
TGT. Gondo
T. Gondo
HHH. Hricak
H. Hricak

1 August 2018 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSangwon Han
Sangwon Han
SWSungmin Woo
Sungmin Woo
YKYeon Joo Kim
Yeon Joo Kim
CSChong Hyun Suh
Chong Hyun Suh

1 August 2017 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSungmin Woo
Sungmin Woo
CSChong Hyun Suh
Chong Hyun Suh
SKSang Youn Kim
Sang Youn Kim
JCJeong Yeon Cho
Jeong Yeon Cho
SKSeung Hyup Kim
Seung Hyup Kim

1 March 2014 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSungmin Woo
Sungmin Woo
SLSang Min Lee
Sang Min Lee
JYJeong Hee Yoon
Jeong Hee Yoon
IJIjin Joo
Ijin Joo
JHJoon Koo Han
Joon Koo Han
BCByung Ihn Choi
Byung Ihn Choi
Diffusion coefficient calculated with intravoxel incoherent motion modeling of diffusion-weighted MR imaging demonstrated superior performance compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient in di... PurposeTo compare the association of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)–derived parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and ...

19 March 2020 in European Urology Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSungmin Woo
Sungmin Woo
VPValeria Panebianco
Valeria Panebianco
YNYoshifumi Narumi
Yoshifumi Narumi
Francesco Del GiudiceFrancesco Del Giudice
Francesco Del Giudice
VMValdair F. Muglia
Valdair F. Muglia
HVHebert Alberto Vargas
Hebert Alberto Vargas

1 December 2014 in Acta Radiologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSungmin Woo
Sungmin Woo
JCJeong Yeon Cho
Jeong Yeon Cho
SKSang Youn Kim
Sang Youn Kim
SKSeung Hyup Kim
Seung Hyup Kim
Background: Until now, several investigators have explored the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the preoperative tumor grading of endometrial cancer. However, the diagnostic value of DWI with quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been controversial. Purpose: To explore the role of histogram analysis of ADC maps based on entire tumor volume in determining the grade of endometrial cancer. Material and Methods: This study was IRB-approved with waiver of informed consent. Thirty-three patients with endometrial cancer underwent DWI (b = 0, 600, 1000 s/mm2), and corresponding ADC maps were acquired. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on all slices of the ADC map in which the tumor was visualized including areas of necrosis to derive volume-based histographic ADC data. Histogram parameters (5th–95th percentiles, mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis) were correlated with histological grade using one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer test for post hoc comparisons, and were compared between high (grade 3) and low (grades 1/2) grade using Student t-test. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the optimum threshold value for each parameter, and their corresponding sensitivity and specificity. Results: The standard deviation, quartile, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles of ADC showed significant differences between grades ( P ≤ 0.03 for all) and between high and low grades ( P ≤ 0.024 for all). There were no significant correlations between tumor grade and other parameters. ROC curve analysis yielded sensitivities and specificities of 75% and 96%, 62.5% and 92%, 100% and 52%, 100% and 72%, and 100% and 88%, using standard deviation, quartile, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles for determining high grade with corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.787, 0.792, 0.765, 0.880, and 0.925, respectively. Conclusion: Histogram analysis of ADC maps based on entire tumor volume can be useful for predicting the histological grade of endometrial cancer. The 90th and 95th percentiles of ADC were the most promising parameters for differentiating high from low grade.