Davide Scafidi

Dr. Davide Scafidi

University of Genoa, Department of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences (DISTAV)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2009 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
SSSolarino Stefano
Solarino Stefano
CEClaudio Eva
Claudio Eva

1 October 2015 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAlfio Viganò
Alfio Viganò
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
GRGiorgio Ranalli
Giorgio Ranalli
SMSilvana Martin
Silvana Martin
BVBruno Della Vedova
Bruno Della Vedova
DSDaniele Spallarossa
Daniele Spallarossa

17 April 2013 in Geophysical Journal International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGabriele Ferretti
Gabriele Ferretti
AZA. Zunino
A. Zunino
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
SBSimone Barani
Simone Barani
DSD. Spallarossa
D. Spallarossa
In this study, microseism recordings from a near coast seismic station and concurrent significant sea wave heights ($$H_{\frac{1}{3}}$$) are analysed to calibrate an empirical relation for predicting sea wave height in the Ligurian Sea. The study stems from the investigation of the damaging sea storms occurred in the Ligurian Sea between 2008 October and November. Analysing data collected in this time frame allows identification of two types of microseism signal, one associated to the local sea wave motion and one attributable to a remote source area. The former is dominated by frequencies greater than 0.2 Hz and the latter by frequencies between 0.07 and 0.14 Hz. Moreover, comparison of microseism spectrogram and significant sea wave heights reveals a strong correlation in that the spectral energy content of microseism results proportional to the sea wave height observed in the same time window. Hence, an extended data set including also observations from January to December 2011 is used to calibrate an empirical predictive relation for sea wave height whose functional form is a modified version of the classical definition of $$H_{\frac{1}{3}}$$. By means of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm we set up a procedure to investigate the inverse problem and to find a set of parameter values for predicting sea wave heights from microseism.

1 May 2018 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBD. Bindi
D. Bindi
DSD. Spallarossa
D. Spallarossa
Matteo PicozziMatteo Picozzi
Matteo Picozzi
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
FCF. Cotton
F. Cotton
In this study, we analyzed 10 yrs of seismicity in central Italy from 2008 to 2017, a period witnessing more than 1400 earthquakes in the magnitude range 2.5≤Mw≤6.5. The data set includes the main sequences that have occurred in the area, including those associated with the 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila earthquake and the 2016–2017 sequence (Mw 6.2 Amatrice, Mw 6.1 Visso, and Mw 6.5 Norcia earthquakes). We calibrated a local magnitude scale, investigating the impact of changing the reference distance at which the nonparametric attenuation is tied to the zero‐magnitude attenuation function for southern California. We also developed an attenuation model to compute the radiated seismic energy (Es) from the time integral of the squared ground‐motion velocity. Seismic moment (M0) and stress drop (Δσ) were estimated for each earthquake by fitting a ω‐square model to the source spectra obtained by applying a nonparametric spectral inversion. The Δσ‐values vary over three orders of magnitude from about 0.1 to 10 MPa, the larger values associated with the mainshocks. The Δσ‐values describe a lognormal distribution with mean and standard deviation equal to log(Δσ)=(−0.25±0.45) (i.e., the mean Δσ is 0.57 MPa, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.08 to 4.79 MPa). The Δσ variability introduces a spread in the distribution of seismic energy versus moment, with differences in energy up two orders of magnitudes for earthquakes with the same moment. The variability in the high‐frequency spectral levels is captured by the local magnitude (ML), which scales with radiated energy as ML=(−1.59+0.52logEs) for logEs≤10.26 and ML=(−1.38+0.50logEs) otherwise. As the peak ground velocity increases with increasing Δσ, local and energy magnitudes perform better than moment magnitude as predictors for the shaking potential. The availability of different magnitude scales and source parameters for a large earthquake population will help characterize the between‐event ground‐motion variability in central Italy.

8 October 2014 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSD. Spallarossa
D. Spallarossa
GFGabriele Ferretti
Gabriele Ferretti
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
CTC. Turino
C. Turino
MPM. Pasta
M. Pasta

31 March 2021 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDaniele Spallarossa
Daniele Spallarossa
MPMatteo Picozzi
Matteo Picozzi
DSDavide Scafidi
Davide Scafidi
PMPaola Morasca
Paola Morasca
CTChiara Turino
Chiara Turino
DBDino Bindi
Dino Bindi
We present Rapid Assessment of MOmeNt and Energy Service (RAMONES), a service for disseminating through a web interface, the estimates of seismic moment (⁠ M0⁠) and radiated energy (⁠ ER⁠) for earthquakes occurring in central Italy with local magnitudes above 1.7. The service is based on a fully‐automatic procedure developed for downloading and processing open seismological data from the European Integrated Data Archive, Italian Civil Protection repository, and Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS). In its actual configuration, RAMONES uses the seismic catalog generated through the event webservice of the Italian Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (compliant with International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks standards) to guide the data download. The concept of RAMONES is to estimate M0 and ER from features extracted directly from recordings, namely the S‐wave peak displacement (⁠ PDS⁠) and the integral of the squared velocity (⁠ IV2S⁠) evaluated over the S‐wave window at local distances. A data set composed of 6515 earthquakes recorded in central Italy between 2008 and 2018 was used to calibrate the attenuation models relating M0 to PDS and ER to IV2S⁠, including station corrections. The calibration values for M0 and ER were extracted from the source spectra obtained by applying a decomposition approach to the Fourier amplitude spectra known as the generalized inversion technique. To test the capabilities of RAMONES, we validate the attenuation models by performing residual analysis over about 60 earthquakes occurring in 2019 that were used for the spectral decomposition analysis but not considered in the calibration phase. Since January 2020, a testing operational phase has been running, and RAMONES has analyzed about 800 earthquakes by September 2020. The distribution of the source parameters and their relevant scaling relationships are automatically computed and disseminated in the form of maps, parametric tables, figures, and reports available through the RAMONES web interface.