Root-knot nematodes (RKNs), Meloidogyne spp., are sedentary endoparasites that negatively affect almost every crop in the world. Current management practices are not enough to completely control RKN. Application of certain chemicals is also being further limited in recent years. It is therefore crucial to develop additional control strategies through the application of environmentally benign methods. There has been much research performed around the world on the topic, leading to useful outcomes and interesting findings capable of improving farmers’ income. It is important to have dependable resources gathering the data produced to facilitate future research. This review discusses recent findings on the application of environmentally benign treatments to control RKN between 2015 and April 2020. A variety of biological control strategies, natural compounds, soil amendments and other emerging strategies have been included, among which, many showed promising results in RKN control in vitro and/or in vivo. Development of these methods continues to be an area of active research, and new information on their efficacy will continuously become available. We have discussed some of the control mechanisms involved and suggestions were given on maximizing the outcome of the future efforts.

The southern root-knot nematode (RKN), Meloidogyne incognita, is particularly difficult to manage because of high susceptibility of all commercial cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cultivars to this nematode. Growers have conventionally relied on nematicide applications to control RKN. Two microplot experiments were conducted in which four nonfumigant nematicides, oxamyl, fluopyram, fluensulfone, and fluazaindolizine, were examined for their efficacy in reducing gall severity and postharvest soil nematode numbers in microplots inoculated with increasing inoculation densities (1,000, 5,000, 10,000, and 20,000 nematodes/microplot), and improving growth and yield of cucumber. Nematicides were applied 1 day prior to transplanting cucumber seedlings, except fluensulfone, which was applied 7 days before transplanting. At harvest, root gall indices differed significantly (P < 0.0001) among nematode inoculation densities and nematicides. All four nematicides were effective in reducing the root gall index when compared with the untreated control on a consistent basis at all M. incognita inoculation densities. At the lowest inoculation density, no significant difference in gall index or final population density was observed among nematicides; however, gall index increased with increasing nematode inoculation densities in nematicide-treated microplots. Correlations between gall index and inoculation density clearly showed that soil treatment with fluensulfone, fluazaindolizine, or fluopyram was more effective in reducing gall severity than treatment with oxamyl. Regression analysis also indicated no significant effect of nematode inoculation densities on yield of cucumber treated with these nematicides. Results of this study will provide guidance for improving nematicide efficiencies in soil with varying inoculation densities of RKN.

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are important contributors to yield reduction in tomato. Though resistant cultivars to common species (Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, and M. javanica) are available, they are not effective against other major species of root-knot nematodes. Cultivars or lines of Solanum sisymbriifolium were examined to assess the presence and level of resistance to five major species: M. arenaria race 1, M. incognita race 3, M. haplanaria, M. javanica, and M. enterolobii. Differences in S. sisymbriifolium response to the nematode infection were apparent when susceptibility or resistance was classified by the egg counts per gram fresh weight of root and the multiplication rate of the nematodes. The cultivar Diamond was highly susceptible, Quattro and White Star were susceptible, while Sis Syn II was resistant to M. arenaria. Quattro, White Star, and Sis Syn II exhibited a moderate to high level of resistance to M. incognita but the nematode increased 2.5-fold from the initial population of the M. incognita on Diamond. All S. sisymbriifolium cultivars were highly resistant to both M. haplanaria and M. enterolobii, while highly susceptible to M. javanica. A microplot study under field conditions using Sis Syn II confirmed that M. arenaria, M. incognita, and M. haplanaria were not pathogenic on the plant. Likewise, an examination on cross-sections of galled root tissues confirmed the susceptibility and resistance of S. sisymbriifolium lines to Meloidogyne spp. Using S. sisymbriifolium as a resistant rootstock or a new source of resistance may result in the development of nonchemical and sustainable management strategies to protect the tomato crop.

Meloidogyne incognita, the southern root-knot nematode (RKN), is the most predominant plant-parasitic nematode species of tomato and causes significant yield loss. The Mi-1.2 gene confers resistance in tomatoes to M. incognita; however, virulent RKN populations capable of parasitizing resistant tomato cultivars have been reported from different regions in the world. Four naturally occurring virulent populations of M. incognita were found in vegetable fields from four counties in Georgia with no history of tomato cultivation of the Mi gene. Two consecutive greenhouse trials showed that all four virulent RKN populations reproduced on tomato cultivars, including Amelia, Skyway, and Myrtle, with the Mi-1 gene, while an avirulent population of M. incognita race 3 was unable to overcome host resistance. Virulent RKN populations varied in reproduction among resistant cultivars, with Ma6 population having the greatest reproduction potential. No difference in penetration potential of the virulent (Ma6) and avirulent populations was found on susceptible and resistant tomato cultivars. However, virulent Ma6 population females were successful at egg-laying, whereas avirulent female development was arrested in the resistant cultivars. The virulent Ma6 population also induced feeding sites in the roots of resistant cultivars, whereas the avirulent population did not. To our knowledge, this is the first report of resistance-breaking populations of M. incognita in Georgia and the second state in the United States after California.