Programmed cell death or type I apoptosis has been extensively studied and its contribution to the pathogenesis of disease is well established. However, autophagy functions together with apoptosis to determine the overall fate of the cell. The cross talk between this active self-destruction process and apoptosis is quite complex and contradictory as well, but it is unquestionably decisive for cell survival or cell death. Autophagy can promote tumor suppression but also tumor growth by inducing cancer-cell development and proliferation. In this review, we will discuss how autophagy reprograms tumor cells in the context of tumor hypoxic stress. We will illustrate how autophagy acts as both a suppressor and a driver of tumorigenesis through tuning survival in a context dependent manner. We also shed light on the relationship between autophagy and immune response in this complex regulation. A better understanding of the autophagy mechanisms and pathways will undoubtedly ameliorate the design of therapeutics aimed at targeting autophagy for future cancer immunotherapies.

Recent antitumor immunotherapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints have led to outstanding results in several cancers. However, despite the favorable outcomes for responding patients, the response rate remains relatively low. This is in part due to the influence of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in protecting the tumor from the antitumor immune response and facilitating immune escape. Tumor hypoxia is one of the most important features of the TME, exerting an adverse effect on tumor aggressiveness and patient prognosis. Hypoxic stress interferes with immune plasticity and promotes tumor heterogeneity and progression. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia is primarily mediated by a family of transcriptional regulators, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). Apart from hypoxia, the HIF pathway is modulated in a hypoxia-independent manner. HIF-1α stabilization and activity are regulated by epigenetic changes and mutations. Strong evidence indicates that tumor hypoxia controls malignant and metastatic phenotype of cancer cells and therefore presents a unique therapeutic challenge in the treatment of solid malignancies. An alluring alternative strategy to reinvigorate anticancer immune responses comes from the emerging field of TME and its associated pathways. Targeting hypoxia or its associated pathways may therefore offer new options in the design of innovative cancer immunotherapy approaches. In this article, we briefly review the potential of hypoxic stress on tumor plasticity and stromal reactivity as well as the possible targeting of hypoxia-induced pathways to increase immunotherapy efficiency.

Background/Objectives: Tumor microenvironmental hypoxia is an established hallmark of solid tumors. It significantly contributes to tumor aggressiveness and therapy resistance and has been reported to affect the balance of activating/inhibitory surface receptors’ expression and activity on NK cells. In the current study, we investigated the impact of hypoxia on the surface expression of Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 (Sig-7/9) and their ligands in NK cells and tumor target cells. The functional consequence of Siglec blockage using nanoparticles specifically designed to target and block Sig-7/9 receptors on NK cell cytotoxicity was elucidated. Methods: CD56⁺ CD3⁻ NK cells were isolated from PBMCs along with an NK-92 clone and used as effector cells, while MCF-7 and K562 served as target cells. All cells were incubated under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 24 h. To assess Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 receptor expression, U937, NK-92, and primary NK cells were stained with PE-labeled antibodies against CD328 Siglec-7/9. Interactions between Siglec-7/9 and their sialylated ligands, along with their functional impact on NK cell activity, were evaluated using polymeric nanoparticles coated with a sialic acid mimetic. Immunological synapse formation and live-cell imaging were performed with a ZEISS LSM 800 with Airyscan at 10× magnification for 24 h. Results: Our data indicate that hypoxia had no effect on the expression of Siglec-7/9 receptors by NK cells. In contrast, hypoxic stress resulted in an increase in Siglec-7 sialoglycan ligand expression by a sub-population of NK target cells. Using polymeric nanoparticles coated with a sialic acid mimetic that binds both Siglec-7 and -9 (Sig-7/9 NP), we demonstrated that incubation of these nanoparticles with NK cells resulted in increased immunological synapse formation, granzyme B accumulation, and killing of NK target cells. These studies indicate that hypoxic stress may have an impact on NK cell-based therapies and highlight the need to consider the hypoxic microenvironment for tumor-specific glycosylation. Conclusions: Our findings point to the role of Siglec–sialylated glycan interactions in hypoxic stress-induced NK cell dysfunction and recommend the potential integration of the manipulation of this axis through the targeting of Siglecs in future cancer immunotherapy strategies.

Background/objectives: Hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment is linked to aggressiveness, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Targeting hypoxia to enhance antitumor immunity is crucial for overcoming therapeutic resistance. Here, we investigated the ability of Evofosfamide, a prodrug that gets activated under hypoxic conditions, to sensitize breast cancer cells to cell death. Evofosfamide is converted into bromo-isophosphoramide mustard, a potent DNA cross-linking agent that is expected to enhance the killing of cancer cells under hypoxic conditions, where these cells typically exhibit resistance. Methods: Representative breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, were treated with Evofosfamide under normoxia and hypoxia. Changes in cell viability and the mechanism of cell death were measured using neutral red dye uptake, Annexin-FITC/propidium iodide staining, and Western blot analysis of markers—PARP1 and caspase 3/7. We tested Evofosfamide’s ability to counteract hypoxic suppression of type I Interferon signaling genes using quantitative PCR (qPCR), as well as its capacity to trigger natural killer (NK)-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Results: Evofosfamide enhanced cell killing in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells under hypoxic conditions compared to normoxic conditions. Cell killing was accompanied by increased cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), diminished mitochondrial membrane potential, and induction of apoptosis, as demonstrated by the fragmentation or laddering of genomic DNA, the activation of caspase 3/7, and the cleavage of PARP. qPCR analysis revealed that Evofosfamide was capable of restoring type I interferon signaling in hypoxic breast cancer cells, leading to the subsequent cytolytic activity of NK cells against the tumor cells. Conclusions: Thus, conditioning the breast cancer cells with Evofosfamide resulted in enhanced cell killing under hypoxia, further underscoring its potential as a sensitizer to target hypoxia-driven tumors.