Ligita Šimanskienė

Prof. Dr. Ligita Šimanskienė

Department of Management, Klaipėda University, Klaipėda, Lithuania

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJurgita Pauzuoliene
Jurgita Pauzuoliene
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
Mariantonietta FioreMariantonietta Fiore
Mariantonietta Fiore
The article analyses the problems of food waste and responsible consumption that include taking into account environmental-social-health and economic impacts of products and services. The study raises the research question related to whether people consume food responsibly. Analysis of research literature sources, systematization, synthesis, generalization, quantitative research and data processing methods were used in the article. The questionnaire was arranged on the pollimill.com website, and the link was shared with selected possible respondents. The survey was carried out in Lithuania and in European countries. The survey sample is equal to 1080 respondents (566 respondents from Lithuania and 514 from Italy, Poland, Latvia, Germany and France). A simple random sample was used in this research. The survey highlighted that the majority of respondents in the survey state that food is not often wasted. In addition, findings show that the population of Lithuania emits slightly less food than the population of the European countries participating in the survey. These findings could be crucial for the future green directions from the side of policymakers.

8 September 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKestutis Bieksa
Kestutis Bieksa
VVVioleta Valiulė
Violeta Valiulė
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
Raffaele SilvestriRaffaele Silvestri
Raffaele Silvestri
The article analyses sustainable economic development of EU countries according to the sustainable development goals (SDGs), by using indices of integrated sustainable development and environmental footprint. Sustainable economic initiatives can be driven by economic, environmental and social aspects, applying principles of innovation and knowledge. However, development requires skills, human and financial resources; in turn, it increases productivity, efficiency, competitiveness, profit, and promotes a better working environment. In general, sustainable business initiatives contribute to SDGs and reduce the environmental footprint. The scientific problem is how to develop a sustainable economy while ensuring the achievement of SDGs and at the same time reducing the environmental footprint. The object of the scientific research is the evaluation of sustainable economic development through the analysis of integrated sustainable development indicators. The aim of the research is, upon the evaluation of SDGs and environmental footprint indices as well as the analysis of the integrated sustainable development indicator, to identify the opportunities for sustainable economic development in the EU countries. The research has been carried out by analysing the scientific literature, and applying SDGs and environmental footprint methodology to calculate individual and integrated sustainable development indices. The results have shown that despite the disparity of SDG indices, the overall value of the integrated sustainable development indicator is distributed quite evenly among the EU countries. The impacts from each of the SDG indices range from 11% to 31% but the environmental footprint index has the greatest impact on the sustainable development of a country—up to 31%.

1 March 2021 in Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EŽErika Župerkienė
Erika Župerkienė
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
DLDaiva Labanauskaite
Daiva Labanauskaite
JMJulija Melnikova
Julija Melnikova
Vida DavidavičienėVida Davidavičienė
Vida Davidavičienė
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues is a peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research papers and case studies

1 March 2021 in Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DLDaiva Labanauskaite
Daiva Labanauskaite
EŽErika Župerkienė
Erika Župerkienė
AKAlexander Kumpf
Alexander Kumpf
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
SKSophie Marie Koller
Sophie Marie Koller
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues is a peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research papers and case studies

16 May 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
EŽErika Župerkienė
Erika Župerkienė
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
Mariantonietta FioreMariantonietta Fiore
Mariantonietta Fiore
JPJulius Paulikas
Julius Paulikas
Indisputably, the competitiveness and ability of modern organisations to remain aligned with the demands of the market depend on their continuous development, therefore the ability to adapt to and implement external changes within organisations. Managing employee resistance to change is key to a successful implementation of change and organisational sustainability. Problem statement: How to manage employee resistance to change in the context of implementing technological change in organisations for organisational sustainability? The aim of research is to identify notable management measures and propose solutions for managing employee resistance to change for organisational sustainability. The survey was conducted in February 2021. The quantitative study analysis identified the main reasons for resistance to change of employees of public passenger transport organisations because of implementation of technological change and effective means of managing it. It is revealed that the affective dimension of resistance determines the behavioural dimension, the main reasons for employee resistance are personal (which mostly determine the affective dimension), the least significant – organisational, most effective resistance management intervention – education and communication, and the least effective – employee involvement (participation). Managers should pay attention to these findings to keep organisational sustainability.

8 June 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VRViljaras Reigas
Viljaras Reigas
Ligita ŠimanskienėLigita Šimanskienė
Ligita Šimanskienė
Organizations may choose means for their aim of accomplishing an extensive spectrum of activities. One of the possible choices is performance accreditation—a voluntary undertaking evaluating organizational performance compliance with the determined standards. Accreditation is considered a tool not only for improving the quality of services but also for developing coherence in the organization; such a process contributes to the achievement of the organization members’ well-being. Yet personal healthcare organizations choose accreditation as an alternative to the execution of their quality management system, and accreditation is considered a tool for service quality improvement by these organizations, even though several studies provide data on the impact on employees. This study evaluates the attitudes of employees of personal healthcare organizations toward the effect of accreditation on organizational cohesion and employee well-being. Five hundred sixty-nine employees of healthcare organizations participated in the study. This study revealed that healthcare professionals statistically significantly better evaluate the impact of accreditation on service quality improvement than on organizational performance, which is related to the influence on the employees’ well-being.