Pyrites are widely distributed in marine sediments, the morphology of which is applied as a proxy to infer the redox conditions of bottom water, and identify diagenetic stages and hydrocarbon leakage activities. In this review, the methods used for the morphological study of pyrite are summarized. The textural and size characteristics of euhedral pyrite and pyrite aggregates, as the formation and evolution mechanism of pyrite are discussed for their significance in reconstructing the geochemical environment. The morphological study of pyrite includes shape observation, size estimation, and surface feature analysis. Scanning electron microscope and optical microscope are the main methods for morphological observation; transmission electron microscope and scanning tunneling microscope are applicable to observe nanoscale morphological structures and crystal growth on the crystal surface, and X-ray computed tomography is capable of measuring pyrite size distribution at the scale of a micrometer. Under the marine sedimentary condition, the single crystal of pyrite appears in cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and their intermediates, the size of which ranges from several nanometers to more than 100 µm. The morphology of euhedral pyrite is controlled by temperature, pH, the chemical composition of interstitial water, etc., and might have been experienced in later reformation processes. The pyrite aggregates occur as framboid, rod-like, fossil-infilling, etc., characterized by the comparatively large size of several microns to several millimeters. It is found that certain textures correspond with different formation mechanisms and geochemical environments. Particularly, under special geological conditions, for instance, the methane leakage and/or decomposition of gas hydrate, pyrite is anomaly enriched with morphological textures of massive framboid cluster, rod-like aggregates, etc., and framboid is found with a large mean diameter (>20 µm) and standard deviation (>10 µm). These typical features can be employed to ascertain the position of the paleo sulfate methane transition zone (SMTZ).

Gas hydrate samples recovered from a cold vent field offshore Vancouver Island were studied in detail both by macroscopic observations and instrumental methods (powder X‐ray diffraction method (PXRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and Raman spectroscopy). It was found that gas hydrates were massive from 2.64 to 2.94 m below seafloor (mbsf), elongated, nodular and tabular from 4.60 to 4.81 mbsf, and vein‐like from 5.48 to 5.68 mbsf, showing a trend of decreasing hydrate content with increasing depth. All samples were determined to be structure I hydrate from PXRD, NMR, and Raman spectroscopies. The hydration numbers were estimated to be 6.1 ± 0.2 on average as determined from the methane distribution over the cage sites from NMR and Raman analytical results. Estimates of conversion levels indicated that ∼78% of the water in the massive samples was hydrate, down to a low value of ∼0.4% for the pore hydrate samples. The results are compared with measurements on synthetic hydrates and samples recovered from below the permafrost on the Mallik site. Differences in methane content and lattice parameters for synthetic and natural samples are relatively minor. Additional work is needed to address the presence of minor gas components and the heterogeneity of natural hydrate samples.

Studies revealed that gas hydrate cages, especially small cages, are incompletely filled with guest gas molecules, primarily associated with pressure and gas composition. The ratio of hydrate cages occupied by guest molecules, defined as cage occupancy, is a critical parameter to estimate the resource amount of a natural gas hydrate reservoir and evaluate the storage capacity of methane or hydrogen hydrate as an energy storage medium and carbon dioxide hydrate as a carbon sequestration matrix. As the result, methods have been developed to investigate the cage occupancy of gas hydrate. In this review, several instrument methods widely applied for gas hydrate analysis are introduced, including Raman, NMR, XRD, neutron diffraction, and the approaches to estimate cage occupancy are summarized.

As one of the most important physical parameters of seawater, salinity is essential to study climatological change, to trace seawater masses and to model ocean dynamics. The traditional way to conduct salinity measurement in hydrographical observation is to use a standard conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) probe where the salinity determination is based on a measurement of electrical conductivity. This article describes some developments of recent years that could lead to a new generation of instruments for the determination of salinity in seawater. Salinity determination with optical salinity sensor based on the refractive index measurement have been extensively studied. Different ways to conduct refractive index measurements are summarized, including measurements based on beam deviation, light wave mode coupling and swelling of surface coating material, among which the optical fiber sensors are promising candidates for further commercialization. Complementary to the above-mentioned direct measurement salinity point sensors, seismic observation takes advantages of large scale multichannel seismic data to retrieve the ocean salinity with high lateral resolution of ∼10 m. This work provide comprehensive information in the techniques related to the marine salinity measurement.