With almost 2.3 million new cases and 685 thousand fatal events in 2020 alone, breast cancer remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Despite the increasing prevalence of the disease in recent years, the number of deaths has dropped—this is mostly the result of better diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities, allowing to recognize and treat breast cancer earlier and more efficiently. However, metastatic disease still remains a therapeutic challenge. As mechanisms of tumor spread are being explored, new drugs can be implemented in clinical practice, improving the outcomes in patients with advanced disease. Formation of metastases is a complex process, which involves activation of angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, chemotaxis, and coagulation. The actions, which occur during metastatic spread are interrelated and complementary. This review summarizes their importance and mutual connections in formation of secondary tumors in breast cancer.

(1) Background: The fundamental causes of breast cancer mortality are the cancer spread and hypercoagulability state. The study aimed to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the fibrinolytic profile concerning 5-year follow-up. (2) Methods: We investigated the predictive potential of the plasma activity of urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) as well as antigen of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), u-PA, PAI-1, and PAI-1/t-PA and PAI-1/u-PA complexes in 41 breast cancer patients. The median follow-up was 66 months, with full evidence of the first event. (3) Results: A significantly lower level of PAI-1 antigen was noted in IBrC patients with lymph node involvement (N1) than in patients with free lymph node metastases (N0). According to ROC curve analysis, a t-PA antigen was the strongest predictor of disease relapse (the area under the curve, AUC = 0.799; p < 0.0006). Patients with PAI-1 activity < 3.04 U/mL had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those with PAI-1 activity > 3.04 U/mL. Patients with both t-PA antigen lower than 1.41 ng/mL (cut-off according to median value) and lower than 1.37 ng/mL (cut-off according to ROC curve) had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.0086; p = 0.0029). (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that a higher plasma t-PA antigen level or lower PAI-1 activity are linked to better outcomes in breast cancer patients.

Background: In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment of breast cancer, but it is still one of the ten leading causes of death in women. The aim of the study was to evaluate the heparanase concentration of invasive breast cancer (IBrC) patients, before and after cancer adjuvant treatment. Methods: Eighty patients with stage IA to IIB IBrC receiving adjuvant treatment were included prospectively in this study. The heparanase concentrations were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A univariate analysis was used to estimate the factors influencing the low or high pre-treatment concentration of heparanase and the low or high numerical decrease in heparanase concentration after completion of adjuvant treatment. Results: Treatment reduced the concentration of heparanase by almost four times in the general IBrC cohort. Higher levels of pre- and post-treatment heparanase were noted in oestrogen receptor-negative cancers than in positive ones. A higher post-treatment concentration of heparanase was found in patients with a triple-negative tumour compared to patients with a luminal B HER2 negative type of IBrC. Overweight IBrC subjects and those with a tumour diameter of ≥2 cm demonstrated a lower chance of a lower pre-treatment heparanase concentration. Interestingly, a pre-treatment heparanase concentration is the main predictor of the changes in heparanase concentration after adjuvant treatment. Follow-up revealed significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) rates in IBrC patients with a pre-treatment concentration of heparanase higher than 181.46 pg/mL (PFS = 80%). Conclusions: Our findings provide supporting evidence that IBrC therapy reduced the heparanase levels, regardless of treatment patterns and a pre-treatment concentration of heparanase may serve as a prognostic indicator for future outcomes.