Mario Riverol

Prof. Mario Riverol

Department of Neurology. Clínica Universidad de Navarra.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 May 2015 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALeire Ambrosio
Leire Ambrosio
JGJuana Maria Senosiain García
Juana Maria Senosiain García
Mario RiverolMario Riverol
Mario Riverol
SASagrario Anaut-Bravo
Sagrario Anaut-Bravo
SASara Díaz De Cerio Ayesa
Sara Díaz De Cerio Ayesa
MPMari Carmen Portillo
Mari Carmen Portillo

3 August 2019 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IMIvan Martinez‐Valbuena
Ivan Martinez‐Valbuena
RVRafael Valenti‐Azcarate
Rafael Valenti‐Azcarate
IAIrene Amat‐Villegas
Irene Amat‐Villegas
Mario RiverolMario Riverol
Mario Riverol
IMIrene Marcilla
Irene Marcilla
Rosario LuquinRosario Luquin
Rosario Luquin

1 October 2014 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCyrus A. Raji
Cyrus A. Raji
KEKirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson
OLOscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez
LKLewis H. Kuller
Lewis H. Kuller
HGH. Michael Gach
H. Michael Gach
JBJames T. Becker
James T. Becker

1 May 2018 in Neurología
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PTP. Tellechea
P. Tellechea
NPN. Pujol
N. Pujol
PEP. Esteve-Belloch
P. Esteve-Belloch
BEB. Echeveste
B. Echeveste
MGM.R. García-Eulate
M.R. García-Eulate
Mario RiverolMario Riverol
Mario Riverol
Early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD), which presents in patients younger than 65 years, has frequently been described as having different features from those of late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD). This review analyses the most recent studies comparing the clinical presentation and neuropsychological, neuropathological, genetic, and neuroimaging findings of both types in order to determine whether EOAD and LOAD are different entities or distinct forms of the same entity. We observed consistent differences between clinical findings in EOAD and in LOAD. Fundamentally, the onset of EOAD is more likely to be marked by atypical symptoms, and cognitive assessments point to poorer executive and visuospatial functioning and praxis with less marked memory impairment. Alzheimer-type features will be more dense and widespread in neuropathology studies, with structural and functional neuroimaging showing greater and more diffuse atrophy extending to neocortical areas (especially the precuneus). In conclusion, available evidence suggests that EOAD and LOAD are 2 different forms of a single entity. LOAD is likely to be influenced by ageing-related processes.

3 January 2019 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPB. Pascual
B. Pascual
SBSusanne Tamara de Bot
Susanne Tamara de Bot
MDM.R. Daniels
M.R. Daniels
MFMarcondes C. França
Marcondes C. França
CTC. Toro
C. Toro
JMJ.C. Masdeu
J.C. Masdeu
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The “ears of the lynx” MR imaging sign has been described in case reports of hereditary spastic paraplegia with a thin corpus callosum, mostly associated with mutations in the spatacsin vesicle trafficking associated gene, causing Spastic Paraplegia type 11 (SPG11). This sign corresponds to long T1 and T2 values in the forceps minor of the corpus callosum, which appears hyperintense on FLAIR and hypointense on T1-weighted images. Our purpose was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ears of the lynx MR imaging sign for genetic cases compared with common potential mimics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four independent raters, blinded to the diagnosis, determined whether the ears of the lynx sign was present in each of a set of 204 single anonymized FLAIR and T1-weighted MR images from 34 patients with causal mutations associated with SPG11 or Spastic Paraplegia type 15 (SPG15). 34 healthy controls, and 34 patients with multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: The interrater reliability for FLAIR images was substantial (Cohen κ, 0.66–0.77). For these images, the sensitivity of the ears of the lynx sign across raters ranged from 78.8 to 97.0 and the specificity ranged from 90.9 to 100. The accuracy of the sign, measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, ranged from very good (87.1) to excellent (93.9). CONCLUSIONS: The ears of the lynx sign on FLAIR MR imaging is highly specific for the most common genetic subtypes of hereditary spastic paraplegia with a thin corpus callosum. When this sign is present, there is a high likelihood of a genetic mutation, particularly associated with SPG11 or SPG15, even in the absence of a family history.

29 May 2020 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDavid Moreno-Ajona
David Moreno-Ajona
EPElena Prieto
Elena Prieto
FGFabiana Grisanti
Fabiana Grisanti
IEInés Esparragosa
Inés Esparragosa
LOLizeth Sánchez Orduz
Lizeth Sánchez Orduz
Mario RiverolMario Riverol
Mario Riverol
Brain positron emission tomography imaging with 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has demonstrated utility in suspected autoimmune encephalitis. Visual and/or assisted image reading is not well established to evaluate hypometabolism/hypermetabolism. We retrospectively evaluated patients with autoimmune encephalitis between 2003 and 2018. Patients underwent EEG, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling and autoantibodies testing. Individual FDG-PET images were evaluated by standard visual reading and assisted by voxel-based analyses, compared to a normal database. For the latter, three different methods were performed: two based on statistical surface projections (Siemens syngo.via Database Comparison, and 3D-SSP Neurostat) and one based on statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Hypometabolic and hypermetabolic findings were grouped to identify specific patterns. We found six cases with definite diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Two cases had anti-LGI1, one had anti-NMDA-R and two anti-CASPR2 antibodies, and one was seronegative. 18F-FDG-PET metabolic abnormalities were present in all cases, regardless of the method of analysis. Medial–temporal and extra-limbic hypermetabolism were more clearly depicted by voxel-based analyses. We found autoantibody-specific patterns in line with the literature. Statistical surface projection (SSP) methods (Neurostat and syngo.via Database Comparison) were more sensitive and localized larger hypermetabolic areas. As it may lead to comparable and accurate results, visual analysis of FDG-PET studies for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis benefits from voxel-based analysis, beyond the approach based on MRI, CSF sample and EEG.