Background and Aim. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a convenient imaging modality in the setting of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) because it is easily available, can be performed bedside and repeated over time. We herein examined LUS patterns in relation to disease severity and disease stage among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods. We performed a retrospective case series analysis of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted to the hospital because of pneumonia. We recorded history, clinical parameters and medications. LUS was performed and scored in a standardized fashion by experienced operators, with evaluation of up to 12 lung fields, reporting especially on B-lines and consolidations. Results. We included 96 patients, 58.3% men, with a mean age of 65.9 years. Patients with a high-risk quick COVID-19 severity index (qCSI) were older and had worse outcomes, especially for the need for high-flow oxygen. B-lines and consolidations were located mainly in the lower posterior lung fields. LUS patterns for B-lines and consolidations were significantly worse in all lung fields among patients with high versus low qCSI. B-lines and consolidations were worse in the intermediate disease stage, from day 7 to 13 after onset of symptoms. While consolidations correlated more with inflammatory biomarkers, B-lines correlated more with end-organ damage, including extrapulmonary involvement. Conclusions. LUS patterns provide a comprehensive evaluation of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia that correlated with severity and dynamically reflect disease stage. LUS patterns may reflect different pathophysiological processes related to inflammation or tissue damage; consolidations may represent a more specific sign of localized disease, whereas B-lines seem to be also dependent upon generalized illness due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background: The correction of iron deficiency (ID) with ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) is a recommended intervention in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. Our aim is to evaluate, in a real-life setting, the clinical significance of ID screening and FCM treatment in acute decompensated HF (ADHF). Methods: In a cohort of ADHF patients, the prevalence of ID and FCM administration were investigated. Among the 104 patients admitted for ADHF, in n = 90 (median age 84, 53.5% with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction—LVEF), a complete iron status evaluation was obtained. ID was detected in n = 73 (81.1%), 55 of whom were treated with in-hospital FCM. The target dose was reached in n = 13. Results: No significant differences were detected in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, or LVEF between the FCM-supplemented and -unsupplemented patients. During a median follow-up of 427 days (IQR 405–466) among the FCM-supplemented patients, only 14.5% received FCM after discharge; the mortality and rehospitalizations among FCM-supplemented and -unsupplemented patients were similar (p = ns). In a follow-up evaluation, ID was still present in 75.0% of the FCM-supplemented patients and in 69.2% of the unsupplemented patients (p = ns). Conclusions: In this real-life ADHF cohort, FCM was administered at lower-than-prescribed doses, thus having no impact on ID correction. The significance of our findings is that only achieving the target dose of FCM and pursuing outpatient treatment can correct ID and produce long-term clinical benefits.