Rita Kiss

Prof. Rita Kiss

Budapest University of Technology and Economics
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2005 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZBZoltán Bejek
Zoltán Bejek
RPRóbert Paróczai
Róbert Paróczai
ÁIÁrpád Illyés
Árpád Illyés
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss

29 October 2003 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZKZsolt Knoll
Zsolt Knoll
LKLászló Kocsis
László Kocsis
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss

1 June 2004 in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZKZsolt Knoll
Zsolt Knoll
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss
LKLászló Kocsis
László Kocsis

14 December 2005 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AIArpád Illyés
Arpád Illyés
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss

1 October 2011 in Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss

21 September 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBálint Petró
Bálint Petró
APAlexandra Papachatzopoulou
Alexandra Papachatzopoulou
RKRita Kiss
Rita Kiss
Static balancing assessment is often complemented with dynamic balancing tasks. Numerous dynamic balancing assessment methods have been developed in recent decades with their corresponding balancing devices and tasks. The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify and categorize existing objective methods of standing dynamic balancing ability assessment with an emphasis on the balancing devices and tasks being used. Three major scientific literature databases (Science Direct, Web of Science, PLoS ONE) and additional sources were used. Studies had to use a dynamic balancing device and a task described in detail. Evaluation had to be based on objectively measureable parameters. Functional tests without instrumentation evaluated exclusively by a clinician were excluded. A total of 63 articles were included. The data extracted during full-text assessment were: author and date; the balancing device with the balancing task and the measured parameters; the health conditions, size, age and sex of participant groups; and follow-up measurements. A variety of dynamic balancing assessment devices were identified and categorized as 1) Solid ground, 2) Balance board, 3) Rotating platform, 4) Horizontal translational platform, 5) Treadmill, 6) Computerized Dynamic Posturography, and 7) Other devices. The group discrimination ability of the methods was explored and the conclusions of the studies were briefly summarized. Due to the wide scope of this search, it provides an overview of balancing devices and do not represent the state-of-the-art of any single method. The identified dynamic balancing assessment methods are offered as a catalogue of candidate methods to complement static assessments used in studies involving postural control.