Timothy D. Veenstra

Dr. Timothy D. Veenstra

Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty, Cedarville University, Cedarville, OH, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2020 in Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra

22 April 2021 in Current Protein & Peptide Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRocco J. Rotello
Rocco J. Rotello
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra
: In the current omics-age of research, major developments have been made in technologies that attempt to survey the entire repertoire of genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites present within a cell. While genomics has led to a dramatic increase in our understanding of such things as disease morphology and how organisms respond to medications, it is critical to obtain information at the proteome level since proteins carry out most of the functions within the cell. The primary tool for obtaining proteome-wide information on proteins within the cell is mass spectrometry (MS). While it has historically been associated with the protein identification, developments over the past couple of decades have made MS a robust technology for protein quantitation as well. Identifying quantitative changes in proteomes is complicated by its dynamic nature and the inability of any technique to guarantee complete coverage of every protein within a proteome sample. Fortunately, the combined development of sample preparation and MS methods have made it capable of quantitatively comparing many thousands of proteins obtained from cells and organisms.

1 April 2022 in Separations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJoseph Paul
Joseph Paul
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra
There are probably no biological samples that did more to spur interest in proteomics than serum and plasma. The belief was that comparing the proteomes of these samples obtained from healthy and disease-affected individuals would lead to biomarkers that could be used to diagnose conditions such as cancer. While the continuing development of mass spectrometers with greater sensitivity and resolution has been invaluable, the invention of strategic strategies to separate circulatory proteins has been just as critical. Novel and creative separation techniques were required because serum and plasma probably have the greatest dynamic range of protein concentration of any biological sample. The concentrations of circulating proteins can range over twelve orders of magnitude, making it a challenge to identify low-abundance proteins where the bulk of the useful biomarkers are believed to exist. The major goals of this article are to (i) provide an historical perspective on the rapid development of serum and plasma proteomics; (ii) describe various separation techniques that have made obtaining an in-depth view of the proteome of these biological samples possible; and (iii) describe applications where serum and plasma proteomics have been employed to discover potential biomarkers for pathological conditions.

1 July 2012 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZXZhen Xiao
Zhen Xiao
LMLixin Mi
Lixin Mi
FCFung-Lung Chung
Fung-Lung Chung
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra
Although isothiocyanates (ITC), which are found in cruciferous vegetables, have been shown to inhibit carcinogenesis in animal models and induce apop

3 January 2023 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOEkenedirichukwu obi
Ekenedirichukwu obi
DTDaniel A. Tellock
Daniel A. Tellock
GTGabriel J. Thomas
Gabriel J. Thomas
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra
The relatively recent developments in mass spectrometry (MS) have provided novel opportunities for this technology to impact modern medicine. One of those opportunities is in biomarker discovery and diagnostics. Key developments in sample preparation have enabled a greater range of clinical samples to be characterized at a deeper level using MS. While most of these developments have focused on blood, tissues have also been an important resource. Fresh tissues, however, are difficult to obtain for research purposes and require significant resources for long-term storage. There are millions of archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues within pathology departments worldwide representing every possible tissue type including tumors that are rare or very small. Owing to the chemical technique used to preserve FFPE tissues, they were considered intractable to many newer proteomics techniques and primarily only useful for immunohistochemistry. In the past couple of decades, however, researchers have been able to develop methods to extract proteins from FFPE tissues in a form making them analyzable using state-of-the-art technologies such as MS and protein arrays. This review will discuss the history of these developments and provide examples of how they are currently being used to identify biomarkers and diagnose diseases such as cancer.

24 October 2023 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HVHannah VandeRoovaart
Hannah VandeRoovaart
NNNguyen Nguyen
Nguyen Nguyen
Timothy D. VeenstraTimothy D. Veenstra
Timothy D. Veenstra
Huntington’s Disease (HD) is a severely debilitating neurodegenerative disorder in which sufferers exhibit different combinations of movement disorders, dementia, and behavioral or psychiatric abnormalities. The disorder is a result of a trinucleotide repeat expansion mutation that is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. While there is currently no treatment to alter the course of HD, there are medications that lessen abnormal movement and psychiatric symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify drugs that are currently in or have completed phase III drug trials for the treatment of HD. The described phase III trials were further limited to interventional studies that were recruiting, active not recruiting, or completed. In addition, all studies must have posted an update within the past year. PubMed was used to gather further information on these interventional studies. Of the nine clinical trials that met these criteria, eight involved the following drugs: metformin, dextromethorphan/quinidine, deutetrabenazine, valbenazine, Cellavita HD, pridopidine, SAGE-718, and RO7234292 (RG6042). Of these drug treatments, four are already FDA approved. This systematic review provides a resource that summarizes the present therapies for treating this devastating condition that are currently in phase III clinical trials in the United States.