Introduction: Central and paracentral retinal function is often compromised in various retinal diseases. In these conditions, microperimetry is an important tool for assessing retinal sensitivity values. As retinal diseases are prevalent among the elderly, cataract often coexists. This study investigates the effect of cataract surgery on retinal sensitivity in patients with cataract without retinal disease. Material and Methods: A total of 30 patients already scheduled for cataract surgery were enrolled and microperimetry and visual acuity evaluation was performed before and after cataract extraction. The patients were allocated to 1 of 3 study groups in accordance with the main cataract subtype: nuclear, cortical, or posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataract. Results: Visual acuity increased significantly after cataract surgery (from 0.34 to 0.00 logMar, p < 0.001, paired t test). Similarly, median retinal sensitivity increased significantly from 23 dB (IQR 21–25 dB) to 27 dB (IQR 25.75–28 dB) (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test). The increase of retinal sensitivity after cataract surgery was highest in the PSC cataract group. Conclusion: This study showed an increase in retinal sensitivity values after cataract removal, especially in the PSC group. Therefore, coexisting cataract should be considered when interpreting microperimetry results.

Purpose: To evaluate the astigmatism-reducing effect of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) for low amounts of corneal astigmatism. Setting: Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Design: Randomized, masked, controlled trial with bilateral comparison. Methods: Patients scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery and a corneal astigmatism in both eyes between 0.75 diopters (D) and 1.5 D were included in this study. The first eye was randomized to receive either a toric IOL or a nontoric IOL, and the contralateral eye received the other type of IOL. At the follow-up visits, optical biometry, corneal measurements with tomography and topography, autorefraction, subjective refraction, corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA/UDVA) with ETDRS charts and a questionnaire were performed. Results: 58 eyes were included in the study. Postoperative median UDVA was 0.00 (logMAR) in the toric eyes and 0.10 in the nontoric eyes (P = .03). The median CDVA was 0.00 in both groups (P = .60). Median residual astigmatism determined by subjective refraction and autorefraction in the toric eyes was 0.25 D and 0.50 D, respectively (P = .04), and 0.50 D and 1.00 D in the nontoric eyes, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: The use of a toric IOL appears to be appropriate from a threshold value of approximately 0.75 D preoperative corneal astigmatism. Further studies in a larger patient population are needed to confirm these results.

Purpose: To use a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning approach to predict intraocular lens (IOL) tilt using preoperative biometry data. Setting: Kepler University Clinic Linz, Linz, Austria. Design: Prospective single-center study. Methods: Optical coherence tomography, autorefraction, and subjective refraction were performed at baseline and 8 weeks after cataract surgery. In analysis I, only 1 eye per patient was included and a tilt prediction model was generated. In analysis II, a pairwise comparison between right and left eyes was performed. Results: In analysis I, 50 eyes of 50 patients were analyzed. Difference in amount, orientation, and vector from preoperative to postoperative lens tilt was −0.13 degrees, 2.14 degrees, and 1.20 degrees, respectively. A high predictive power (variable importance for projection [VIP]) for postoperative tilt prediction was found for preoperative tilt (VIP = 2.2), pupil decentration (VIP = 1.5), lens thickness (VIP = 1.1), axial eye length (VIP = 0.9), and preoperative lens decentration (VIP = 0.8). These variables were applied to a machine learning algorithm resulting in an out of bag score of 0.92 degrees. In analysis II, 76 eyes of 38 patients were included. The difference of preoperative to postoperative IOL tilt of right and left eyes of the same individual was statistically relevant. Conclusions: Postoperative IOL tilt showed excellent predictability using preoperative biometry data and a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning algorithm. Preoperative lens tilt, pupil decentration, lens thickness, axial eye length, and preoperative lens decentration were found to be the most relevant parameters for this prediction model.

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) power calculation in a middle European patient cohort. Setting: EyeLaser Clinic, Linz, Austria. Design: Single-center single-surgeon retrospective consecutive case series. Methods: Patients were included after uneventful pIOL surgery implanting 91 nontoric and toric Visian implantable collamer lens model V4c. Online Calculation and Ordering System (OCOS) software, JPhakic software, Olsen-Feingold formula, Holladay formula, and Linz-Homburg-Castrop (LHC) formula were compared. When possible, lens constants were optimized for the patient cohort. Data of single eye per patient were included. Outcome measures were mean absolute prediction error, median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD, and median prediction error, as well as the percentage of eyes with an absolute prediction error within limits of 0.25 diopters (D), 0.5 D, 0.75 D, and 1.0 D. Results: 91 eyes of 91 patients were assessed. After application of the Cochran Q test, the Olsen-Feingold formula achieved a significantly lower percentage of eyes within an absolute prediction error of 1.0 D than all other methods. Conclusions: In the patient cohort, OCOS software, JPhakic software, and Holladay and LHC formulas showed equal results and can be cross-checked. The LHC formula was not published before. A ready-to-use Excel sheet is available as an addendum.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of phacoemulsification on outcomes among patients undergoing vitrectomy with membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membranes, with respect to new postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes and early transient macular edema. Procedures: This retrospective analysis included patients from 6 prospective studies, examining outcomes of 23G pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling due to idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Phacovitrectomy with membrane peeling was performed only in the case of coexisting vision affecting cataract. Optical coherence tomography was performed prior to surgery, in the first week, and 3 months after surgery. Results: In total, 183 patients were included. The occurrence of new postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes and early transient macular edema showed a trend toward being higher among patients undergoing phacovitrectomy with membrane peeling, compared to vitrectomy with membrane peeling alone, but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.5 and p = 0.186). The final best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) 3 months after surgery was significantly lower among patients with new postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes compared to patients without (with a median difference of 1 line between groups; p = 0.016). Conclusions: New postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes and early transient macular edema are more frequent among patients undergoing phacovitrectomy with membrane peeling compared to patients with vitrectomy with membrane peeling alone.

To create a validated, standardized, logarithmic European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) reading chart in German and to use this reading chart as a template for comparable reading charts in other languages. Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, and Department of Ophthalmology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. Prospective multicenter validation study. Thirty-nine short standardized German sentences were developed and tested on healthy volunteers and pseudophakic patients. On the first visit, corrected distance visual acuity was assessed in each eye using autorefraction (KR8000) and subjective refraction using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts at 4 m. Reading speed, when reading the new ESCRS reading charts, was tested under photopic conditions (85 to 100 candelas/m(2)) and high contrast (≥95% Michelson contrast). The study assessed 120 subjects. Sixty subjects were young healthy volunteers and 60 were pseudophakic patients. Reliability of the sentences was tested using Cronbach's α and was found to be high (α = 0.994). Furthermore, reproducibility was high in most cases and the absolute mean difference between the first measurement and second measurement for all sentences was 0.56 seconds ± 0.07 (SD) (range 0.43 to 0.72 seconds). The German version of the ESCRS reading charts, a standardized logarithmic and validated reading test, was reliable in healthy volunteers as well as in pseudophakic patients. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.