Mark Muzi

Dr. Mark Muzi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSarthak Pati
Sarthak Pati
Ujjwal BaidUjjwal Baid
Ujjwal Baid
BEBrandon Edwards
Brandon Edwards
MSMicah Sheller
Micah Sheller
SWShih-Han Wang
Shih-Han Wang
Spyridon BakasSpyridon Bakas
Spyridon Bakas
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise across disciplines, out-of-sample generalizability is concerning. This is currently addressed by sharing multi-site data, but such centralization is challenging/infeasible to scale due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable ML, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 sites across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, reporting the largest such dataset in the literature (n = 6, 314). We demonstrate a 33% delineation improvement for the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% for the complete tumor extent, over a publicly trained model. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more healthcare studies informed by large diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further analyses for glioblastoma by releasing our consensus model, and 3) demonstrate the FL effectiveness at such scale and task-complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data-sharing.

17 July 2009 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMark Muzi
Mark Muzi
DMDavid A. Mankoff
David A. Mankoff
JLJeanne M. Link
Jeanne M. Link
SSSteve Shoner
Steve Shoner
ACAnn C. Collier
Ann C. Collier
JUJashvant D. Unadkat
Jashvant D. Unadkat
The multiple-drug resistance (MDR) transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is highly expressed at the human blood–brain barrier (BBB). P-gp actively effluxes a wide variety of drugs from the central nervous system, including anticancer drugs. We have previously demonstrated P-gp activity at the human BBB using PET of 11C-verapamil distribution into the brain in the absence and presence of the P-gp inhibitor cyclosporine-A (CsA). Here we extend the initial noncompartmental analysis of these data and apply compartmental modeling to these human verapamil imaging studies. Methods: Healthy volunteers were injected with 15O-water to assess blood flow, followed by 11C-verapamil to assess BBB P-gp activity. Arterial blood samples and PET images were obtained at frequent intervals for 5 and 45 min, respectively, after injection. After a 60-min infusion of CsA (intravenously, 2.5 mg/kg/h) to inhibit P-gp, a second set of water and verapamil PET studies was conducted, followed by 11C-CO imaging to measure regional blood volume. Blood flow was estimated using dynamic 15O-water data and a flow-dispersion model. Dynamic 11C-verapamil data were assessed by a 2-tissue-compartment (2C) model of delivery and retention and a 1-tissue-compartment model using the first 10 min of data (1C10). Results: The 2C model was able to fit the full dataset both before and during P-pg inhibition. CsA modulation of P-gp increased blood–brain transfer (K1) of verapamil into the brain by 73% (range, 30%−118%; n = 12). This increase was significantly greater than changes in blood flow (13%; range, 12%−49%; n = 12, P < 0.001). Estimates of K1 from the 1C10 model correlated to estimates from the 2C model (r = 0.99, n = 12), indicating that a short study could effectively estimate P-gp activity. Conclusion: 11C-verapamil and compartmental analysis can estimate P-gp activity at the BBB by imaging before and during P-gp inhibition by CsA, indicated by a change in verapamil transport (K1). Inhibition of P-gp unmasks verapamil trapping in brain tissue that requires a 2C model for long imaging times; however, transport can be effectively measured using a short scan time with a 1C10 model, avoiding complications with labeled metabolites and tracer retention.


1 November 2012 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMark Muzi
Mark Muzi
FOFinbarr O'Sullivan
Finbarr O'Sullivan
DMDavid A. Mankoff
David A. Mankoff
RDRobert K. Doot
Robert K. Doot
LPLarry A. Pierce
Larry A. Pierce
PKPaul E Kinahan
Paul E Kinahan

1 February 2005
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMark Muzi
Mark Muzi
HVHubert Vesselle
Hubert Vesselle
JGJohn R Grierson
John R Grierson
DMDavid A Mankoff
David A Mankoff
RSRodney A Schmidt
Rodney A Schmidt
KKKenneth A Krohn
Kenneth A Krohn

1 October 2004
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAlexander M Spence
Alexander M Spence
MMMark Muzi
Mark Muzi
DMDavid A Mankoff
David A Mankoff
SOS Finbarr O'Sullivan
S Finbarr O'Sullivan
JLJeanne M Link
Jeanne M Link
KKKenneth A Krohn
Kenneth A Krohn