Stephen Whebell

Dr. Stephen Whebell

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2022 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
JZJoe Zhang
Joe Zhang
RLRebecca Lewis
Rebecca Lewis
MBMichael Berry
Michael Berry
SLStephane Ledot
Stephane Ledot
LCLuigi Camporota
Luigi Camporota

22 March 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBarbara Ficial
Barbara Ficial
FVFrancesco Vasques
Francesco Vasques
JZJoe Zhang
Joe Zhang
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
MSMichael Slattery
Michael Slattery
LCLuigi Camporota
Luigi Camporota
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for severe respiratory failure has seen an exponential growth in recent years. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) represent two modalities that can provide full or partial support of the native lung function, when mechanical ventilation is either unable to achieve sufficient gas exchange to meet metabolic demands, or when its intensity is considered injurious. While the use of ECMO has defined indications in clinical practice, ECCO2R remains a promising technique, whose safety and efficacy are still being investigated. Understanding the physiological principles of gas exchange during respiratory ECLS and the interactions with native gas exchange and haemodynamics are essential for the safe applications of these techniques in clinical practice. In this review, we will present the physiological basis of gas exchange in ECMO and ECCO2R, and the implications of their interaction with native lung function. We will also discuss the rationale for their use in clinical practice, their current advances, and future directions.

14 August 2023 in PLOS Global Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJack Gallifant
Jack Gallifant
JZJoe Zhang
Joe Zhang
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
JQJustin Quion
Justin Quion
BEBraiam Escobar
Braiam Escobar
LCLeo Anthony Celi
Leo Anthony Celi
Current methods to evaluate a journal’s impact rely on the downstream citation mapping used to generate the Impact Factor. This approach is a fragile metric prone to being skewed by outlier values and does not speak to a researcher’s contribution to furthering health outcomes for all populations. Therefore, we propose the implementation of a Diversity Factor to fulfill this need and supplement the current metrics. It is composed of four key elements: dataset properties, author country, author gender and departmental affiliation. Due to the significance of each individual element, they should be assessed independently of each other as opposed to being combined into a simplified score to be optimized. Herein, we discuss the necessity of such metrics, provide a framework to build upon, evaluate the current landscape through the lens of each key element and publish the findings on a freely available website that enables further evaluation. The OpenAlex database was used to extract the metadata of all papers published from 2000 until August 2022, and Natural language processing was used to identify individual elements. Features were then displayed individually on a static dashboard developed using TableauPublic, which is available at www.equitablescience.com. In total, 130,721 papers were identified from 7,462 journals where significant underrepresentation of LMIC and Female authors was demonstrated. These findings are pervasive and show no positive correlation with the Journal’s Impact Factor. The systematic collection of the Diversity Factor concept would allow for more detailed analysis, highlight gaps in knowledge, and reflect confidence in the translation of related research. Conversion of this metric to an active pipeline would account for the fact that how we define those most at risk will change over time and quantify responses to particular initiatives. Therefore, continuous measurement of outcomes across groups and those investigating those outcomes will never lose importance. Moving forward, we encourage further revision and improvement by diverse author groups in order to better refine this concept.

29 July 2020 in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
SSSunil Sane
Sunil Sane
SNSumant Naidu
Sumant Naidu
HWHayden White
Hayden White
Assess change in ultrasound measures of diaphragm mechanics over the course of a 30-minute spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Prospective observational study. Single intensive care unit (Logan Hospital, Queensland, Australia), patients recruited from August 2016 to April 2018. Eligible patients were over the age of 18 years, ventilated for >24 hours, and planned to undergo an SBT. In total, 129 patients were screened. Ultrasound measures taken at 5 and 30 minutes during SBT: diaphragmatic excursion (DE), diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF), and diaphragmatic contraction speed (DCS). Diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (DRSBI) was calculated using DE/respiratory rate. The presence of diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) was also determined using DTF < 30%, DE < 11 mm, or DRSBI > 1.6. Eighteen patients had ultrasound measures during an SBT. Four were unable to have DTF visualized. There was no significant change in DTF (n = 14, 32.41 ± 32.21 vs 23.19 ± 17.42, P = .33) or DE (n = 18, 1.72 ± 0.63 vs 1.66 ± 0.59, P = .63) over time. Diaphragmatic contraction speed increased over time (n = 18, 2.21 ± 1.25 vs 2.67 ± 1.61, P = .007). Diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index worsened over time (n = 18, 1.65 ± 1.02 vs 2.08 ± 1.51, P = .03). There was no significant change in the presence of DD. Diaphragmatic dysfunction by DTF 8/14 versus 10/14, by DE 4/18 versus 3/18, and by DRSBI 7/18 versus 9/18. No patients failed SBT and one patient failed extubation. Diaphragmatic mechanics may change over the course of an SBT. Further research is required to determine the clinical implications of these changes and the optimal timing of diaphragmatic ultrasound to predict weaning outcome. Diaphragmatic ultrasound may be less feasible than the published data suggest.

8 February 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBarbara Ficial
Barbara Ficial
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
DTDan Taylor
Dan Taylor
RGRITA FERNANDEZ GARDA
RITA FERNANDEZ GARDA
LOLawrence Okiror
Lawrence Okiror
CMChristopher I.S. Meadows
Christopher I.S. Meadows
COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can be associated with extensive lung damage, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum and, in severe cases, persistent air leaks (PALs) via bronchopleural fistulae (BPF). PALs can impede weaning from invasive ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We present a series of patients requiring veno-venous ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS who underwent endobronchial valve (EBV) management of PAL. This is a single-centre retrospective observational study. Data were collated from electronic health records. Patients treated with EBV met the following criteria: ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS; the presence of BPF causing PAL; air leak refractory to conventional management preventing ECMO and ventilator weaning. Between March 2020 and March 2022, 10 out of 152 patients requiring ECMO for COVID-19 developed refractory PALs, which were successfully treated with bronchoscopic EBV placement. The mean age was 38.3 years, 60% were male, and half had no prior co-morbidities. The average duration of air leaks prior to EBV deployment was 18 days. EBV placement resulted in the immediate cessation of air leaks in all patients with no peri-procedural complications. Weaning of ECMO, successful ventilator recruitment and removal of pleural drains were subsequently possible. A total of 80% of patients survived to hospital discharge and follow-up. Two patients died from multi-organ failure unrelated to EBV use. This case series presents the feasibility of EBV placement in severe parenchymal lung disease with PAL in patients requiring ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS and its potential to expedite weaning from both ECMO and mechanical ventilation, recovery from respiratory failure and ICU/hospital discharge.

21 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAashish Kumar
Aashish Kumar
CAChristopher Anstey
Christopher Anstey
RDRa’eesa Doola
Ra’eesa Doola
PMPhilippa. Mcllroy
Philippa. Mcllroy
SWStephen Whebell
Stephen Whebell
MRMahesh Ramanan
Mahesh Ramanan
Objective: This study aimed to determine the associations between lactate clearance in hyperlactataemic patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and intensive care unit (ICU), hospital length of stay (LOS), and case-fatality. Methods: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort study of adult patients admitted to ICU with hyperlactataemia and a primary diagnosis of DKA from twelve sites in Queensland, Australia was conducted utilising pre-existing datasets that were linked for research purposes. The patients were divided into early and late lactate clearance groups; the early lactate clearance group included patients whose lactate returned to <2.0 mmol/L within 12 h, and the remainder were classified as late lactate clearance group. Results: The final dataset included 511 patients, 427 in the early lactate clearance group and 84 in the late lactate clearance group. Late lactate clearance was associated with increasing ICU LOS (β = +15.82, 95% CI +0.05 to +31.59, p < 0.049), increasing hospital LOS (β = +7.24, 95% CI +0.11 to 14.37, p = 0.048) and increasing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHE) III score (ICU LOS outcome variable β = +1.05, 95% CI +0.88 to +1.22, p < 0.001; hospital LOS outcome variable β = +3.40, 95% CI +2.22 to 4.57, p < 0.001). Hospital case-fatality was not significantly different (2.2% in the early clearance group vs. 1.7% in the late clearance group, p = 0.496). Conclusions: In hyperlactataemic patients with DKA, late lactate clearance was associated with a statistically significant increase in both ICU and hospital LOS, though the clinical significance in both is minor.