Asparaginases are a cornerstone of treatment protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and are used for remission induction and intensification treatment in all pediatric regimens and in the majority of adult treatment protocols. Extensive clinical data have shown that intensive asparaginase treatment improves clinical outcomes in childhood ALL. Three asparaginase preparations are available: the native asparaginase derived from Escherichia coli (E. coli asparaginase), a pegylated form of this enzyme (PEG‐asparaginase), and a product isolated from Erwinia chrysanthemi, ie, Erwinia asparaginase. Clinical hypersensitivity reactions and silent inactivation due to antibodies against E. coli asparaginase, lead to inactivation of E. coli asparaginase in up to 60% of cases. Current treatment protocols include E. coli asparaginase or PEG‐asparaginase for first‐line treatment of ALL. Typically, patients exhibiting sensitivity to one formulation of asparaginase are switched to another to ensure they receive the most efficacious treatment regimen possible. Erwinia asparaginase is used as a second‐ or third‐line treatment in European and US protocols. Despite the universal inclusion of asparaginase in such treatment protocols, debate on the optimal formulation and dosage of these agents continues. This article provides an overview of available evidence for optimal use of Erwinia asparaginase in the treatment of ALL. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: Outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) improved greatly by intensifying chemotherapy for all patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels during the first months predict outcome and may select patients for therapy reduction or intensification. Methods: Patients 1 to 18 years old with ALL were stratified on the basis of MRD levels after the first and second course of chemotherapy. Thereafter, therapy was substantially reduced in patients with undetectable MRD (standard risk) and intensified in patients with intermediate (medium risk) and high (high risk) levels of MRD. Seven hundred seventy-eight consecutive patients were enrolled. The method of analysis was intention-to-treat. Outcome was compared with historical controls. Results: In MRD-based standard-risk patients, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 93% (SE 2%), the 5-year survival rate was 99% (SE 1%), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse rate was 6% (SE 2%). The safety upper limit of number of observation years was reached and therapy reduction was declared safe. MRD-based medium-risk patients had a significantly higher 5-year EFS rate (88%, SE 2%) with therapy intensification (including 30 weeks of asparaginase exposure and dexamethasone/vincristine pulses) compared with historical controls (76%, SE 6%). Intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in MRD-based high-risk patients resulted in a significantly better 5-year EFS rate (78%, SE 8% v 16%, SE 8% in controls). Overall outcome improved significantly (5-year EFS rate 87%, 5-year survival rate 92%, and 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse rate 8%) compared with preceding Dutch Childhood Oncology Group protocols. Conclusion: Chemotherapy was substantially reduced safely in one-quarter of children with ALL who were selected on the basis of undetectable MRD levels, without jeopardizing the survival rate. Outcomes of patients with intermediate and high levels of MRD improved with therapy intensification.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of a new recom-binant Escherichia coli–asparaginase preparation was compared with Asparaginase medac. Thirty-two children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomized to receive one of both agents at a dose of 5000 U/m² every 3 days, for a total of 8 doses during induction treatment. The serum activity-time profile after the first dose of recombinant asparaginase was similar to that of Asparaginase medac. The trough serum activities were greater than the desired threshold of 100 U/L in both treatment groups. Asparagine was completely depleted in serum and in cerebrospinal fluid, whereas glutamine levels were only moderately influenced. No significant difference between the 2 treatments regarding the degree of asparagine depletion, duration of depletion, complete remission rate, and minimal residual disease status at the end of induction, overall frequency or intensity of adverse events was seen. Observed adverse reactions are known as possible and labeled side effects of asparaginase treatment and chemotherapy. We conclude that the new recombinant asparaginase and other native Asparaginase medac are bioequivalent and have the same pharmacodynamic effects and the same direct toxicity profile in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This trial was registered at http://www.controlled-trials.com as no. ISRCTN 75734403.

Systemic combination chemotherapy and intrathecal chemotherapy markedly increased the survival rate of children with ALL. In the past two decades, the use of minimal (measurable) residual disease (MRD) measurements early in therapy improved risk group stratification with subsequent treatment intensifications for patients at high risk of relapse, and enabled a reduction of treatment for low-risk patients. The recent development of more sensitive MRD technologies may further affect risk stratification. Molecular genetic profiling has led to the discovery of many new subtypes and their driver genetic alterations. This increased our understanding of the biological basis of ALL, improved risk classification, and enabled implementation of precision medicine. In the past decade, immunotherapies, including bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and cellular therapies directed against surface proteins, led to more effective and less toxic therapies, replacing intensive chemotherapy courses and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed and refractory ALL, and are now being tested in newly diagnosed patients. It has taken 50-60 years to increase the cure rate in childhood ALL from 0% to 90% by stepwise improvements in chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of how the developments over the past 10-15 years mentioned above have significantly changed the diagnostic and treatment approach in ALL, and discusses how the integrated use of molecular and immunotherapeutic insights will very likely direct efforts to cure those children with ALL who are not cured today, and improve the quality of life for survivors who should have decades of life ahead. Future efforts must focus on making effective, yet very expensive, new technologies and therapies available to children with ALL worldwide.