The poultry industry in the United States has traditionally implemented non-chemical and chemical interventions against Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. on the basis of experience and word-of-mouth information shared among poultry processors. The effects of individual interventions have been assessed with microbiological testing methods for Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. prevalence as well as quantification of indicator organisms, such as aerobic plate counts (APC), to demonstrate efficacy. The current study evaluated the loads of both indicators and pathogens in a commercial chicken processing facility, comparing the “normal chemical”, with all chemical interventions turned-on, at typical chemical concentrations set by the processing plant versus low-chemical process (“reduced chemical”), where all interventions were turned off or reduced to the minimum concentrations considered in the facility’s HACCP system. Enumeration and prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. as well as indicator organisms (APC and Enterobacteriaceae—EB) enumeration were evaluated to compare both treatments throughout a 25-month sampling period. Ten locations were selected in the current bio-mapping study, including live receiving, rehanger, post eviscerator, post cropper, post neck breaker, post IOBW #1, post IOBW #2, prechilling, post chilling, and parts (wings). Statistical process control parameters for each location and processing schemes were developed for each pathogen and indicator evaluated. Despite demonstrating significant statistical differences between the normal and naked processes in Salmonella spp. counts (“normal” significantly lower counts than the “reduced” at each location except for post-eviscerator and post-cropper locations), the prevalence of Salmonella spp. after chilling is comparable on both treatments (~10%), whereas for Campylobacter spp. counts, only at the parts’ location was there significant statistical difference between the “normal chemical” and the “reduced chemical”. Therefore, not all chemical intervention locations show an overall impact on Salmonella spp. or Campylobacter spp., and certain interventions can be turned off to achieve the same or better microbial performance if strategic intervention locations are enhanced.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of an aqueous ozone (Bio-Safe) treatment and lactic acid solutions on natural microbiota and E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella surrogates on beef carcasses and trim in a commercial beef processing plant. For every repetition, 40 carcass and 40 trim swabs (500 cm²) were collected. Samples were taken using EZ-Reach^TM swabs, and plated into aerobic plate count (APC), coliform, and E. coli Petrifilm^TM for enumeration. In addition, a five-strain cocktail (MP-26) of E. coli surrogates was inoculated onto trim. For every trim surrogate repetition, 30 trim pieces were sampled after attachment and after ozone intervention. Samples were diluted and counts were determined using the TEMPO^® system for E. coli enumeration. Ozone and lactic acid interventions significantly reduced (p < 0.003) bacterial counts in carcasses and trim samples. Moreover, lactic acid further reduced APC and coliforms in trim samples compared to ozone intervention (p < 0.009). In the surrogate trials, ozone significantly reduced (p < 0.001) surrogate concentration. Historical data from the plant revealed a reduction (p < 0.001) of presumptive E. coli O157:H7 in trim after a full year of ozone intervention implementation. The novel technology for ozone generation and application as an antimicrobial can become an alternative option that may also act synergistically with existing interventions, minimizing the risk of pathogens such as Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7.

The poultry industry in Colombia has implemented several changes and measures in chicken processing to improve sanitary operations and control pathogens’ prevalence. However, there is no official in-plant microbial profile reference data currently available throughout the processing value chains. Hence, this research aimed to study the microbial profiles and the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates in three plants. In total, 300 samples were collected in seven processing sites. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and levels of Enterobacteriaceae were assessed. Additionally, whole-genome sequencing was conducted to characterize the isolated strains genotypically. Overall, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. in each establishment was 77%, 58% and 80% for plant A, B, and C. The mean levels of Enterobacteriaceae in the chicken rinsates were 5.03, 5.74, and 6.41 log CFU/mL for plant A, B, and C. Significant reductions were identified in the counts of post-chilling rinsate samples; however, increased levels were found in chicken parts. There were six distinct Salmonella spp. clusters with the predominant sequence types ST32 and ST28. The serotypes Infantis (54%) and Paratyphi B (25%) were the most commonly identified within the processing plants with a high abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes.

The poultry industry in the United States is one of the largest in the world. Poultry consumption has significantly increase since the COVID-19 pandemic and is predicted to increase over 16% between 2021 and 2030. Two of the most significant causes of hospitalizations and death in the United States are highly related to poultry consumption. The FSIS regulates poultry processing, enforcing microbial performance standards based on Salmonella and Campylobacter prevalence in poultry processing establishments. This prevalence approach by itself is not a good indicator of food safety. More studies have shown that it is important to evaluate quantification along with prevalence, but there is not much information about poultry mapping using quantification and prevalence. In this study, enumeration and prevalence of Salmonella and Campylobacter were evaluated throughout the process at three different plants in the United States. Important locations were selected in this study to evaluate the effect of differences interventions. Even though there were high differences between the prevalences in the processes, some of the counts were not significantly different, and they were effective in maintaining pathogens at safe levels. Some of the results showed that the intervention and/or process were not well controlled, and they were not effective in controlling pathogens. This study shows that every plant environment is different, and every plant should be encouraged to implement a bio-mapping study. Quantification of pathogens leads to appropriate risk assessment, where physical and chemical interventions can be aimed at specific processing points with higher pathogen concentrations using different concentrations of overall process improvement.

The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative baseline of indicator organisms and Salmonella by bio-mapping throughout the processing chain from harvest to final product stages within a commercial conventional design pork processing establishment. Swab samples were taken on the harvest floor at different processing steps, gambrel table, after polisher, before final rinse, after the final rinse, post snap chill, and after peroxyacetic acid (PAA) application, while 2-pound product samples were collected for trim and ground samples. The samples were subjected to analysis for indicator microorganism enumeration, Aerobic Count (AC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB), and generic Escherichia coli (EC), with the BioMérieux TEMPO^®. Salmonella prevalence and enumeration was evaluated using the BAX^® System Real-Time Salmonella and the SalQuant™ methodology. Microbial counts were converted to Log Colony-forming units (CFU) on a per mL, per g or per sample basis, presented as LogCFU/mL, LogCFU/g and LogCFU/sample, prior to statistical analysis. All indicator microorganisms were significantly reduced at the harvest floor (p-value < 0.001), from gambrel table to after PAA cabinet location. The reduction at harvest was 2.27, 2.46 and 2.24 LogCFU/mL for AC, EB and EC, respectively. Trim sample values fluctuated based on cut, with the highest average AC count found at neck trim (2.83 LogCFU/g). Further process samples showed the highest AC count in sausage with a mean of 5.28 LogCFU/g. EB counts in sausage (3.19 LogCFU/g) showed an evident increase, compared to the reduction observed at the end of harvest and throughout trim processing. EC counts showed a similar trend to EB counts with the highest value found in sausage links (1.60 LogCFU/g). Statistical microbial process control (SPC) parameters were also developed for each of the indicator microorganisms, using the overall mean count ($\stackrel{=}{\mathrm{X}}$), the Lower control limit (LCL) and Upper control limit (UCL) at each sampling location. For Salmonella prevalence, a total of 125/650 samples were found positive (19%). From those positive samples, 47 samples (38%) were suitable for enumeration using the BAX^® System SalQuant™, the majority detected at the gambrel table location. From those enumerable samples, 60% were estimated to be between 0.97 and 1.97 LogCFU/sample, while the rest (40%) were higher within the 2.00–4.02 LogCFU/sample range. This study provides evidence for the application of indicator and pathogen quantification methodologies for food safety management in commercial pork processing operations.

Chicken carcass and parts rinsate samples and fecal samples were collected at different stages in a commercial poultry processing facility. Microbiological analysis was conducted to determ...