Marinela Moldoveanu

Dr. Marinela Moldoveanu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LZLiliana Zaharia
Liliana Zaharia
GIGabriela Ioana-Toroimac
Gabriela Ioana-Toroimac
GMGabriela-Adina Moroşanu
Gabriela-Adina Moroşanu
AGAndreea-Cristina Gălie
Andreea-Cristina Gălie
MMMarinela Moldoveanu
Marinela Moldoveanu
NCNicu Ciobotaru
Nicu Ciobotaru

24 July 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMarkus Eder
Markus Eder
Francesca PerosaFrancesca Perosa
Francesca Perosa
SHSeverin Hohensinner
Severin Hohensinner
Michael TritthartMichael Tritthart
Michael Tritthart
Sabrina ScheuerSabrina Scheuer
Sabrina Scheuer
Helmut HabersackHelmut Habersack
Helmut Habersack
Floodplains are a fundamental source of multiple functions and services. Despite their various benefits, a dramatic reduction in floodplain areas has occurred in most large river systems over the last few centuries, and is still ongoing. Human modifications (such as river regulation, dam construction, and land use changes) due to economic growth, increasing population size, etc., were and still are drivers of major floodplain losses. Therefore, studies offering solutions for floodplain preservation and restoration are of great importance for sustainable floodplain management. This paper presents methods to identify active, former, and potential floodplains, and their application to the Danube River. We used hydraulic data, historical sources, and recent geospatial data to delineate the three floodplain types. Fifty hydraulically active floodplains larger than 500 ha were identified. According to our results, the extent of Danube floodplains has been reduced by around 79%. With the support of different representatives from the Danube countries, we identified 24 potential floodplains. However, the share of active and potential floodplains in relation to former floodplains ranges between 5% and 49%, demonstrating the huge potential for additional restoration sites. This analysis contributes to an understanding of the current and the past floodplain situation, increases awareness of the dramatic floodplain loss along the Danube, and serves as a basis for future floodplain management.

17 January 2023 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarinela Moldoveanu
Marinela Moldoveanu
SSStelian Stanescu
Stelian Stanescu
AGAndreea-Cristina Gălie
Andreea-Cristina Gălie
The environmental impact assessment is a process required in many countries. It highlights future activities with a significant impact on the environment. Water, as an environmental factor, needs adequate methods for quantifying cumulative impact of hydrotechnical works. In most cases, for new developments, baseline data is collected before the beginning of the construction, but for waterworks already in place, a different approach is needed. In line with the EU Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC), the overall purpose of the research is to develop an approach for the hydromorphological cumulative impact assessment integrating different spatial scales for existing water intakes with transversal barriers on mountain rivers in Romania. Being a research study developed for a specific issue—post-construction impact assessment, some innovative actions were required. Lack of information in the pre-construction phase was an important constraint. Customizing formulas of certain indicators established within the Romanian method for hydromorphological status assessment of rivers proved to be a practical solution to show both local and waterbody hydromorphological impact. Upscaling the impact from the local scale to the river sector and the waterbody allows awareness of the spatial extent of the impact and understanding of the importance of the thresholds of significant impact for a broader audience. In order to better highlight the approach, this paper shows practical examples. The whole chain of the drivers–pressures–state–impacts–responses (DPSIR) framework is applied in the case of two river water bodies with hydropower generation facilities in place. In addition, some recommendations for actions are provided.