THEODORE LIAKAKOS

Prof. THEODORE LIAKAKOS

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2001 in Digestive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLTHEODORE LIAKAKOS
THEODORE LIAKAKOS
NTNikolaos Thomakos
Nikolaos Thomakos
PFPaul M. Fine
Paul M. Fine
CDChristos Dervenis
Christos Dervenis
RYRonald L. Young
Ronald L. Young
Aim: To summarize the most common etiologic factors and describe the pathophysiology in the formation of peritoneal adhesions, to outline their clinical significance and consequences, and to evaluate the pharmacologic, mechanical, and surgical adjuvant strategies to minimize peritoneal adhesion formation. Methods: We performed an extensive MEDLINE search of the internationally published English literature of all medical and epidemiological journal articles, textbooks, scientific reports, and scientific journals from 1940 to 1997. We also reviewed reference lists in all the articles retrieved in the search as well as those of major texts regarding intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation. All sources identified were reviewed with particular attention to risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, various methods, and innovative techniques for effectively and safely reducing the formation of postsurgical adhesions. Results: The formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions is an important complication following gynecological and general abdominal surgery, leading to clinical and significant economical consequences. Adhesion occur in more than 90% of the patients following major abdominal surgery and in 55–100% of the women undergoing pelvic surgery. Small-bowel obstruction, infertility, chronic abdominal and pelvic pain, and difficult reoperative surgery are the most common consequences of peritoneal adhesions. Despite elaborate efforts to develop effective strategies to reduce or prevent adhesions, their formation remains a frequent occurrence after abdominal surgery. Conclusions: Until additional information and findings from future clinical investigations exist, only a meticulous surgical technique can be advocated in order to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery.

13 December 2017 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nikolaos CharalampakisNikolaos Charalampakis
Nikolaos Charalampakis
PEPanagiota Economopoulou
Panagiota Economopoulou
IKIoannis Kotsantis
Ioannis Kotsantis
MTMaria Tolia
Maria Tolia
DSDimitrios Schizas
Dimitrios Schizas
APAmanda Psyrri
Amanda Psyrri
Gastric cancer remains a considerable health burden throughout the world. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) analysis has recently unveiled 4 genotypes of gastric cancer with data not ready to change treatment strategy yet. A multimodality approach to therapy is the cornerstone of screening, diagnosing, staging, treating and supporting patients with gastric cancer. The evidence‐based approach to localized gastric cancer (>cT1b) is to use an either preoperative or postoperative strategy to maximize the benefit of surgery. The focus of future research is to optimize chemotherapy regimens, determine the role of radiation therapy and investigate the effect of treatment timing. In metastatic gastric cancer, biologic therapies have been introduced targeting markers shown to be prognostic. The results of ongoing randomized controlled phase 3 trials using targeted and immunotherapy agents, either in combination or alone, have the potential to alter the current treatment landscape of advanced gastric cancer.

1 February 1994 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTHEODORE LIAKAKOS
THEODORE LIAKAKOS
IKI. Karanikas
I. Karanikas
HPH. Panagiotidis
H. Panagiotidis
SDS. Dendrinos
S. Dendrinos

23 January 2008 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTHEODORE LIAKAKOS
THEODORE LIAKAKOS
Dimitrios RoukosDimitrios Roukos
Dimitrios Roukos

1 July 2010 in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dimitrios RoukosDimitrios Roukos
Dimitrios Roukos
CKChristos Katsios
Christos Katsios
TLTHEODORE LIAKAKOS
THEODORE LIAKAKOS

16 December 2017 in Physiological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNikolaos D. Patelis
Nikolaos D. Patelis
DMD. Moris
D. Moris
DSD. Schizas
D. Schizas
CDC. Damaskos
C. Damaskos
DPD. Perrea
D. Perrea
SGS. Georgopoulos
S. Georgopoulos
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a prevalent and potentially life threatening disease. Many animal models have been developed to simulate the natural history of the disease or test preclinical endovascular devices and surgical procedures. The aim of this review is to describe different methods of AAA induction in animal models and report on the effectiveness of the methods described in inducing an analogue of a human AAA. The PubMed database was searched for publications with titles containing the following terms “animal” or ‘‘animal model(s)’’ and keywords “research”, “aneurysm(s)’’, “aorta”, “pancreatic elastase’’, “Angiotensin”, “AngII” “calcium chloride” or “CaCl2”. Starting date for this search was set to 2004, since previously bibliography was already covered by the review of Daugherty and Cassis (2004). We focused on animal studies that reported a model of aneurysm development and progression. A number of different approaches of AAA induction in animal models has been developed, used and combined since the first report in the 1960’s. Although specific methods are successful in AAA induction in animal models, it is necessary that these methods and their respective results are in line with the pathophysiology and the mechanisms involved in human AAA development. A researcher should know the advantages/disadvantages of each animal model and choose the appropriate model.