Annette Hofmann

Dr. Annette Hofmann

Maurice R. Greenberg School of Risk Management, Insurance and Actuarial Science, Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2020 in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWSpencer Wheatley
Spencer Wheatley
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
DSDidier Sornette
Didier Sornette

9 July 2019 in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
CRCasey Rothschild
Casey Rothschild

1 April 2020 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMark J. Browne
Mark J. Browne
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
ARAndreas Richter
Andreas Richter
SRSophie-Madeleine Roth
Sophie-Madeleine Roth
PSPetra Steinorth
Petra Steinorth

23 March 2018 in Journal of Risk and Insurance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
OHOle V. Häfen
Ole V. Häfen
MNMartin Nell
Martin Nell

18 July 2018 in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
JNJulia K. Neumann
Julia K. Neumann
DPDavid Pooser
David Pooser

9 November 2021 in Journal of Business Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMatthias Pelster
Matthias Pelster
AHAnnette Hofmann
Annette Hofmann
NKNina Klocke
Nina Klocke
SWSonja Warkulat
Sonja Warkulat
We study the relationship between risk managers’ dark triad personality traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) and their selective hedging activities. Using a primary survey of 412 professional risk managers, we find that managers with dark personality traits are more likely to engage in selective hedging than those without. This effect is particularly pronounced for older, male, and less experienced risk managers. The effect is also stronger in smaller firms, less centralized risk management departments, and family-owned firms.