M. Lúcia Saraiva

Prof. M. Lúcia Saraiva

LAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Química Aplicada, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2017 in ChemSusChem
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSusana P. F. Costa
Susana P. F. Costa
AAAna M. O. Azevedo
Ana M. O. Azevedo
PPPaula C. A. G. Pinto
Paula C. A. G. Pinto
M. Lúcia SaraivaM. Lúcia Saraiva
M. Lúcia Saraiva


11 May 2018 in Advanced Biosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAntti Rahikkala
Antti Rahikkala
SPSarah A.P. Pereira
Sarah A.P. Pereira
PFPatrícia Figueiredo
Patrícia Figueiredo
Marieta PassosMarieta Passos
Marieta Passos
Andre RTS AraujoAndre RTS Araujo
Andre RTS Araujo
Hélder SantosHélder Santos
Hélder Santos


15 February 2024 in Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FMFátima Mota
Fátima Mota
Marieta PassosMarieta Passos
Marieta Passos
JSJoão L.M. Santos
João L.M. Santos
M. Lúcia SaraivaM. Lúcia Saraiva
M. Lúcia Saraiva
Chronic wounds (CW) present a significant healthcare challenge due to their prolonged healing time and associated complications. To effectively treat these wounds and prevent further deterioration, monitoring their healing progress is crucial. Traditional wound assessment methods relying on visual inspection and subjective evaluation are prone to inter-observer variability. Biomarkers play a critical role in objectively evaluating wound status and predicting healing outcomes, providing quantitative measures of wound healing progress, inflammation, infection, and tissue regeneration. Recent attention has been devoted to identifying and validating CW biomarkers. Various studies have investigated potential biomarkers, including growth factors, cytokines, proteases, and extracellular matrix components, shedding light on the complex molecular and cellular processes within CW. This knowledge enables a more targeted and personalized approach to wound management. Accurate and sensitive techniques are necessary for detecting CW biomarkers. Thus, this review compares and discusses the use of electrochemical and optical sensors for biomarker determination. The advantages and disadvantages of these sensors are highlighted. Differences in detection capabilities and characteristics such as non-invasiveness, portability, high sensitivity, specificity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness, compatibility with point-of-care applications, and real-time monitoring of wound biomarkers will be pointed out and compared. In summary, this work provides an overview of CW, explores the emerging field of CW biomarkers, and discusses methods for detecting these biomarkers, with a specific focus on optical and electrochemical sensors. The potential of further research and development in this field for advancing wound care and improving patient outcomes will also be noted.

1 March 2015 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSusana P.F. Costa
Susana P.F. Costa
PPPaula C.A.G. Pinto
Paula C.A.G. Pinto
RLRui A.S. Lapa
Rui A.S. Lapa
M. Lúcia SaraivaM. Lúcia Saraiva
M. Lúcia Saraiva