Markus Barth

Dr. Markus Barth


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 August 2015 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth
FBFelix Breuer
Felix Breuer
PKPeter J. Koopmans
Peter J. Koopmans
DNDavid G. Norris
David G. Norris
BPBenedikt A Poser
Benedikt A Poser
Simultaneous multislice imaging (SMS) using parallel image reconstruction has rapidly advanced to become a major imaging technique. The primary benefit is an acceleration in data acquisition that is equal to the number of simultaneously excited slices. Unlike in‐plane parallel imaging this can have only a marginal intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio penalty, and the full acceleration is attainable at fixed echo time, as is required for many echo planar imaging applications. Furthermore, for some implementations SMS techniques can reduce radiofrequency (RF) power deposition. In this review the current state of the art of SMS imaging is presented. In the Introduction, a historical overview is given of the history of SMS excitation in MRI. The following section on RF pulses gives both the theoretical background and practical application. The section on encoding and reconstruction shows how the collapsed multislice images can be disentangled by means of the transmitter pulse phase, gradient pulses, and most importantly using multichannel receiver coils. The relationship between classic parallel imaging techniques and SMS reconstruction methods is explored. The subsequent section describes the practical implementation, including the acquisition of reference data, and slice cross‐talk. Published applications of SMS imaging are then reviewed, and the article concludes with an outlook and perspective of SMS imaging. Magn Reson Med 75:63–81, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society of Medicine in Resonance.

1 May 2010 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBenedikt A Poser
Benedikt A Poser
PKP.J. Koopmans
P.J. Koopmans
TWT. Witzel
T. Witzel
LWL.L. Wald
L.L. Wald
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth

17 August 2010 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PKPeter J. Koopmans
Peter J. Koopmans
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth
DNDavid G. Norris
David G. Norris

1 May 2015 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristian Langkammer
Christian Langkammer
KBKristian Bredies
Kristian Bredies
BPBenedikt A Poser
Benedikt A Poser
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth
GRGernot Gernot Reishofer
Gernot Gernot Reishofer
SRStefan Ropele
Stefan Ropele

1 May 2016 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIrati Markuerkiaga
Irati Markuerkiaga
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth
DNDavid G. Norris
David G. Norris

1 November 2000 in Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJürgen R. Reichenbach
Jürgen R. Reichenbach
MBMarkus Barth
Markus Barth
EHE. Mark Haacke
E. Mark Haacke
MKMarkus Klarhöfer
Markus Klarhöfer
WKWerner A. Kaiser
Werner A. Kaiser
EMEwald Moser
Ewald Moser
The aim of this study was to investigate the visualization of small venous vessels in the normal human brain at a field strength of 3 Tesla. T2*-weighted, three-dimensional gradient-echo images were acquired by exploiting the magnetic susceptibility difference between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the vasculature and microvasculature. The spatial resolution was 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 mm3, and sequence parameters were varied to obtain good vessel delineation. Improved visibility of venous vessels was obtained by creating phase mask images from the magnetic resonance phase images and multiplying these by the magnitude images. Venograms were created by performing a minimum intensity projection over targeted volumes. Highly detailed visualization of venous structures deep in the brain and in the superficial cortical areas were obtained without administration of an exogenous contrast agent; compared with similar studies performed at 1.5 T, the echo time could be reduced from typically 40–50 ms to 17–28 ms. Imaging at high-field strength offers the possibility of improved resolution and the delineation of smaller vessels compared with lower field strengths.