Gopikrishna Deshpande

Prof. Gopikrishna Deshpande

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Broun Hall, 341 War Eagle Way, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 June 2008 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande
SLStephan LaConte
Stephan LaConte
GJGeorge Andrew James
George Andrew James
SPScott Peltier
Scott Peltier
XHXiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu

1 September 2010 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande
KSK. Sathian
K. Sathian
XHXiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu

1 March 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSimon Lacey
Simon Lacey
HHHenrik Hagtvedt
Henrik Hagtvedt
VPVanessa M. Patrick
Vanessa M. Patrick
AAAmy Anderson
Amy Anderson
RSRandall Stilla
Randall Stilla
KSK. Sathian
K. Sathian

6 January 2015 in IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande
PWPeng Wang
Peng Wang
DRD. Rangaprakash
D. Rangaprakash
BWBogdan Wilamowski
Bogdan Wilamowski
Automated recognition and classification of brain diseases are of tremendous value to society. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a diverse spectrum disorder whose diagnosis is based on behavior and hence will benefit from classification utilizing objective neuroimaging measures. Toward this end, an international competition was conducted for classifying ADHD using functional magnetic resonance imaging data acquired from multiple sites worldwide. Here, we consider the data from this competition as an example to illustrate the utility of fully connected cascade (FCC) artificial neural network (ANN) architecture for performing classification. We employed various directional and nondirectional brain connectivity-based methods to extract discriminative features which gave better classification accuracy compared to raw data. Our accuracy for distinguishing ADHD from healthy subjects was close to 90% and between the ADHD subtypes was close to 95%. Further, we show that, if properly used, FCC ANN performs very well compared to other classifiers such as support vector machines in terms of accuracy, irrespective of the feature used. Finally, the most discriminative connectivity features provided insights about the pathophysiology of ADHD and showed reduced and altered connectivity involving the left orbitofrontal cortex and various cerebellar regions in ADHD.

1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GDGopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande
LLLauren E. Libero
Lauren E. Libero
KSKarthik R. Sreenivasan
Karthik R. Sreenivasan
HDHrishikesh D. Deshpande
Hrishikesh D. Deshpande
RKRajesh K. Kana
Rajesh K. Kana
Alterations in interregional neural connectivity have been suggested as a signature of the pathobiology of autism. There have been many reports of functional and anatomical connectivity being altered while individuals with autism are engaged in complex cognitive and social tasks. Although disrupted instantaneous correlation between cortical regions observed from functional MRI is considered to be an explanatory model for autism, the causal influence of a brain area on another (effective connectivity) is a vital link missing in these studies. The current study focuses on addressing this in an fMRI study of Theory-of-Mind (ToM) in 15 high-functioning adolescents and adults with autism and 15 typically developing control participants. Participants viewed a series of comic strip vignettes in the MRI scanner and were asked to choose the most logical end to the story from three alternatives, separately for trials involving physical and intentional causality. The mean time series, extracted from 18 activated regions of interest, were processed using a multivariate autoregressive model (MVAR) to obtain the causality matrices for each of the 30 participants. These causal connectivity weights, along with assessment scores, functional connectivity values, and fractional anisotropy obtained from DTI data for each participant, were submitted to a recursive cluster elimination based support vector machine classifier to determine the accuracy with which the classifier can predict a novel participant's group membership (autism or control). We found a maximum classification accuracy of 95.9% with 19 features which had the highest discriminative ability between the groups. All of the 19 features were effective connectivity paths, indicating that causal information may be critical in discriminating between autism and control groups. These effective connectivity paths were also found to be significantly greater in controls as compared to ASD participants and consisted predominantly of outputs from the fusiform face area and middle temporal gyrus indicating impaired connectivity in ASD participants, particularly in the social brain areas. These findings collectively point toward the fact that alterations in causal connectivity in the brain in ASD could serve as a potential non-invasive neuroimaging signature for autism.

1 January 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGopikrishna Deshpande
Gopikrishna Deshpande
PSPriya Santhanam
Priya Santhanam
XHXiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu