Background: Osteoporotic fragility fractures frequently occur at the distal part of the radius. This suggests that initial osteoporosis evaluation at this site may inform screening and treatment to prevent additional fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of distal forearm dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a screening tool to assess the risk of fragility fractures at the distal part of the radius. Methods: This retrospective, case-control study included postmenopausal women who had sustained a distal radial fracture (fracture group, n = 110) and postmenopausal women with no history of fracture (control group, n = 95). DXA measurements at the spine, hip, and distal part of the forearm (ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal sections) were compared between the groups on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD), T-score, and the proportion of patients with a T-score of ≤–2.5 standard deviations (SD). We also investigated the regional differences on the basis of T-score among the skeletal sites. Furthermore, the reliability of distal forearm DXA measurements was validated by assessing the statistical correlation (r) with volumetric BMD by computed tomography (CT). Results: Compared with the control group, the fracture group showed significantly lower BMD and T-scores and higher proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤–2.5 SD at the ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal forearm; however, the spine and hip measurements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. With respect to regional differences, in the fracture group, T-scores were significantly lower and the proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤–2.5 SD were significantly higher for the 3 distal forearm sites compared with the spine and hip. DXA measurements at all 3 of the distal forearm regions exhibited high correlation with volumetric BMD by CT (r = 0.83 to 0.92). Conclusions: Some postmenopausal women were found to exhibit bone loss preferentially at the distal part of the radius, which may render them vulnerable to fragility fractures. Forearm DXA for the assessment of local bone loss may demonstrate benefit in screening for those at risk for distal radial fractures and facilitate the early identification of patients who require intervention for osteoporosis. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: During elbow procedures, reconstruction of the joint (including the articular cartilage) is important in order to restore elbow function; however, the regional distribution of elbow cartilage is not completely understood. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the 3-dimensional (3-D) distribution patterns of cartilage thickness of elbow bones (including the distal part of the humerus, proximal part of the ulna, and radial head) in order to elucidate the morphological relationship among them. Methods: Two 3-D surface models were created with use of a laser scanner: (1) a cartilage-bone model based on 20 elderly cadaveric elbows exhibiting normal cartilaginous conditions and (2) a bone model that was created after dissolving the cartilage. The 2 models were superimposed, and cartilage thickness was measured as the interval distance on the articular surface. Measurements were made at categorized anatomical points of the individual bones, and 3-D distributions on the entire articular surface were analyzed. The spatial relationship among individual bones was also assessed. Results: In the distal part of the humerus, the cartilage was thickest in the intermediate region between the capitellum and the trochlea (mean [and standard deviation], 1.27 ± 0.17 mm); in the proximal part of the ulna, it was thickest at the anterolateral edge of the coronoid (2.20 ± 0.39 mm) and the anteroproximal edge of the proximal sigmoid notch (2.49 ± 0.55 mm); and in the radial head, it was thickest at the articular zone on the rim circumference within the dish (1.10 ± 0.17 mm) and on the proximal circumference around the side (1.02 ± 0.17 mm) (p < 0.001 for all). These thicker cartilage regions gathered on the joint center, facing each other. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated regional variations in elbow cartilage thickness. The combined findings in individual bones showed “cartilage gathering” at the center of the elbow joint, which we believe to be a novel anatomical finding. Clinical Relevance: An enhanced understanding of elbow cartilage geometry will provide additional insights into elbow procedures in elderly individuals, such as hemiarthroplasties, in which anatomical contours could help to restore normal joint function and improve postoperative outcomes.