David Topps

Prof. David Topps

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2013 in Academic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
JHJoyce Helmer
Joyce Helmer
RERachel Ellaway
Rachel Ellaway
The means to share educational materials have grown considerably over the years, especially with the multitude of Internet channels available to educators. This article describes an innovative use of YouTube as a publishing platform for clinical educational materials. The authors posted online a series of short videos for teaching clinical procedures anticipating that they would be widely used. The project Web site attracted little traffic, alternatives were considered, and YouTube was selected for exploration as a publication channel. YouTube’s analytics tools were used to assess uptake, and viewer comments were reviewed for specific feedback in support of evaluating and improving the materials posted. The uptake was much increased with 1.75 million views logged in the first 33 months. Viewer feedback, although limited, proved useful. In addition to improving uptake, this approach also relinquishes control over how materials are presented and how the analytics are generated. Open and anonymous access also limits relationships with end users. In summary, YouTube was found to provide many advantages over self-publication, particularly in terms of technical simplification, increased audience, discoverability, and analytics. In contrast to the transitory interest seen in most YouTube content, the channel has seen sustained popularity. YouTube’s broadcast model diffused aspects of the relationship between educators and their learners, thereby limiting its use for more focused activities, such as continuing medical education.

1 June 2015 in Medical Teacher
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RERachel H. Ellaway
Rachel H. Ellaway
JCJanet Coral
Janet Coral
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
MTMaureen Topps
Maureen Topps
The widespread use of digital media (both computing devices and the services they access) has blurred the boundaries between our personal and professional lives. Contemporary students are the last to remember a time before the widespread use of the Internet and they will be the first to practice in a largely e-health environment. This article explores concepts of digital professionalism and their place in contemporary medical education, and proposes a series of principles of digital professionalism to guide teaching, learning and practice in the healthcare professions. Despite the many risks and fears surrounding their use, digital media are not an intrinsic threat to medical professionalism. Professionals should maintain the capacity for deliberate, ethical, and accountable practice when using digital media. The authors describe a digital professionalism framework structured around concepts of proficiency, reputation, and responsibility. Digital professionalism can be integrated into medical education using strategies based on awareness, alignment, assessment, and accountability. These principles of digital professionalism provide a way for medical students and medical practitioners to embrace the positive aspects of digital media use while being mindful and deliberate in its use to avoid or minimize any negative consequences.

1 October 2014 in BMC Research Notes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCeara Tess Cunningham
Ceara Tess Cunningham
PCPin Cai
Pin Cai
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
LSLawrence W Svenson
Lawrence W Svenson
NJNathalie Jetté
Nathalie Jetté
HQHude Quan
Hude Quan
Physician claims data are one of the largest sources of coded health information unique to Canada. There is skepticism from data users about the quality of this data. This study investigated features of diagnostic codes used in the Alberta physician claims database. Alberta physician claims from January 1 to March 31, 2011 are analyzed. Claims contain coded diagnoses using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), procedures, physician specialty and service-fee type. Descriptive statistics examined the diversity and frequency of unique ICD-9 diagnostic codes used and the level of code extension (e.g. 3- or 4-digit coding). A total of 7,441,005 claims by 6,601 physicians were analyzed. The average number of claims per physician was 1,079, with ranges between 1,330 for family medicine, 690 for internal medicine, 722 for surgery, 516 for pediatrics and 409 for neurology. Family physicians used an average of 121 diagnostic codes, internal medicine physicians 32, surgery 36, pediatrics 46 and neurology 27. Overall, 43.5% of claims had a more detailed diagnosis (ICD code with >3 digits). Physicians on a fee-for-service plan submitted 1,184 claims and used 88 unique diagnosis codes on average compared to 438 claims and 44 unique diagnosis codes from physicians on an alternative payment plan (APP). Face validity of diagnosis coded in physician claims is substantially high and the features of diagnosis codes seem to reasonably reflect the clinical specialty. Physicians submit a diverse array of ICD 9 diagnostic codes and nearly half of the ICD-9 diagnostic codes examined were more detailed than required (i.e. ICD code with >3 digits). Finally, guidelines and policies should be explored to assess the submission of shadow billings for physicians on APPs.

3 June 2015 in The Clinical Teacher
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RERachel Ellaway
Rachel Ellaway
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
SLSonya Lee
Sonya Lee
HAHeather Armson
Heather Armson

22 January 2015 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EDEleni Dafli
Eleni Dafli
PAPanagiotis Evaggelos Antoniou
Panagiotis Evaggelos Antoniou
LILazaros Ioannidis
Lazaros Ioannidis
NDNicholas Dombros
Nicholas Dombros
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
PANAGIOTIS BAMIDISPANAGIOTIS BAMIDIS
PANAGIOTIS BAMIDIS
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet

1 January 2009 in Medical Teacher
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RERachel H. Ellaway
Rachel H. Ellaway
RKRoger Kneebone
Roger Kneebone
KLKevin Lachapelle
Kevin Lachapelle
DTDavid Topps
David Topps
Simulation modalities are generally used independently of one another, largely due to physical and operational limitations to integration. Recent developments are enabling simulators and simulation environments to progress beyond single intervention models towards integrated continua of simulation. Moving to greater integration can improve contextualisation, better management of the transition from individual simulation to clinical practice, and provide wider opportunities to synthesise skills and approaches to practice. Simulation integration may involve experiential, modelling, technical, narrative, and evaluation dimensions; it includes both direct actions and activities, and technical and systems designs. The work in developing these integration continua is ongoing and takes many forms in many places. The framework of ‘practica continua’ proposed in this article links theoretical approaches and practical examples of integrated uses of simulation in education.