This narrative review portrays the lymphatic system, a poorly understood but important physiological system. While several reviews have been published that are related to the biology of the lymphatic system and lymphedema, the physiological alternations, which arise due to disturbances of this system, and during lymphedema therapy, are poorly understood and, consequently, not widely reported. We present an inclusive collection of evidence from the scientific literature reflecting important developments in lymphedema research over the last few decades. This review aims at advancing the knowledge on the area of lymphatic system function as well as how system dysfunction, as seen in lymphedema, affects physiological systems and how lymphedema therapy modulates these mechanisms. We propose that future studies should aim at investigating, in-detail, aspects that are related to fluid regulation, hemodynamic responses, and endothelial and/or vascular changes due to lymphedema and lymphedema therapy.

Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), a physical therapy including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) and compression bandaging, is aimed at mobilizing fluid and reducing limb volume in lymphedema patients. Details of fluid shifts occurring in response to CDT are currently not well studied. Therefore, we investigated fluid shifts before, during and after CDT. Thirteen patients (3 males and 10 females, aged 57 ± 8.0 years, 167.2 ± 8.3 cm height, 91.0 ± 23.4 kg weight) diagnosed with stage II leg lymphedema participated. Leg volume, limb and whole-body fluid composition (total body water (limbTBW/%TBW), extracellular (limbECF/%ECF) and intracellular (limbICF/%ICF fluid), as well as ECF/ICF and limbECF/limbICF ratios were determined using perometry and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Plasma volume, proteins, osmolality, oncotic pressure and electrolytes were assessed. Leg volume (p < 0.001), limbECF (p = 0.041), limbICF (p = 0.005) and limbECF/limbICF decreased over CDT. Total leg volume and limbTBW were correlated (r = 0.635). %TBW (p = 0.001) and %ECF (p = 0.007) decreased over time. The maximum effects were seen within one week of CDT. LimbICF (p = 0.017), %TBW (p = 0.009) and %ICF (p = 0.003) increased post-MLD, whereas ECF/ICF decreased due to MLD. Plasma volume increased by 1.5% post-MLD, as well as albumin and the albumin-to-globulin ratio (p = 0.005 and p = 0.049, respectively). Our results indicate that physical therapy leads to fluid shifts in lymphedema patients, with the greatest effects occurring within one week of therapy. Fluid shifts due to physical therapy were also reflected in increased plasma volume and plasma protein concentrations. Perometry, in contrast to bioelectrical impedance analysis, does not seem to be sensitive enough to detect small fluid changes caused by manual lymphatic drainage.

Background: Lymphedema arises due to a malfunction of the lymphatic system, leading to extensive tissue swelling. Complete decongestive therapy (CDT), which is a physical therapy lasting for 3 weeks and includes manual lymphatic drainages (MLD), leads to fluid mobilization and increases in plasma volume. Here, we investigated hemodynamic responses induced by these fluid shifts due to CDT and MLD. Methods: Hemodynamic parameters were assessed continuously during a sit-to-stand test (5 min baseline, 5 min of standing, and 5 min of recovery). This intervention was repeated on days 1, 2, 7, 14, and 21 of CDT, before and after MLD. Volume regulatory hormones were assessed in plasma samples. Results: A total number of 13 patients took part in this investigation. Resting diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased over three weeks of CDT (p = 0.048). No changes in baseline values were shown due to MLD. However, MLD led to a significant decrease in heart rate during orthostatic loading over all epochs on therapy day 14, as well as day 21. Volume regulatory hormones did not show changes over lymphedema therapy. Conclusion: We did not observe any signs of orthostatic hypotension at rest, as well as during to CDT, indicating that lymphedema patients do not display an elevated risk of orthostatic intolerance. Although baseline hemodynamics were not affected, MLD has shown to have potential beneficial effects on hemodynamic responses to a sit-to-stand test in patients undergoing lymphedema therapy.