Matteo Suter

Dr. Matteo Suter

SC Oncologia, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in Future Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMario Petrillo
Mario Petrillo
FPFrancesca Patella
Francesca Patella
Filippo PesapaneFilippo Pesapane
Filippo Pesapane
MSMatteo Suter
Matteo Suter
AIAnna M Ierardi
Anna M Ierardi
GCGianpaolo Carrafiello
Gianpaolo Carrafiello
This review focuses upon interactions and potential therapeutic targets in the ‘vicious cycle’ between hypoxia and neoangiogenesis following treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial loco-regional therapies. Biomarkers correlated with angiogenesis have been studied by many authors as prognostic determinants following transarterial intrahepatic therapy. According to these results future therapies directed toward specific factors related to angiogenesis could play a significant role in preventing local tumor recurrence and remote metastasis.

1 May 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLeonardo Campiotti
Leonardo Campiotti
MSMatteo Suter
Matteo Suter
LGLuigina Guasti
Luigina Guasti
RPRocco Piazza
Rocco Piazza
CGCarlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
ASAlessandro Squizzato
Alessandro Squizzato

16 March 2020 in Medical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Filippo PesapaneFilippo Pesapane
Filippo Pesapane
MSMatteo Suter
Matteo Suter
Anna RotiliAnna Rotili
Anna Rotili
SPSilvia Penco
Silvia Penco
ONOlga Nigro
Olga Nigro
ECEnrico Cassano
Enrico Cassano

1 October 2020 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMatteo Suter
Matteo Suter
Filippo PesapaneFilippo Pesapane
Filippo Pesapane
GAGiorgio Maria Agazzi
Giorgio Maria Agazzi
TGTania Gagliardi
Tania Gagliardi
ONOlga Nigro
Olga Nigro
ASAlessandro Squizzato
Alessandro Squizzato
Breast cancer diagnosis and staging is based on mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) has gained momentum as an innovative and clinically useful method for breast assessment. CESM is based on abnormal enhancement of neoplastic tissue compared to surrounding breast tissue. We performed a systematic review of prospective trial to evaluate its diagnostic performance, following standard PRISMA-DTA. We used a bivariate random-effects regression approach to obtain summary estimates of both sensitivity and specificity of CESM. 8 studies published between 2003 and 2019 were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 945 lesions. The summary area under the curve obtained from all the study was 89% [95% CI 86%-91%], with a sensitivity of 85% [95% CI 73%-93%], and a specificity of 77% [95% CI 60%-88%]. With a pre-test probability of malignancy of 57% a positive finding at CESM gives a post-test probability of 83% while a negative finding a post-test probability of 20%. CESM shows a suboptimal sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of breast cancer in a selected population, and at present time, it could be considered only as a possible alternative test for breast lesions assessment when mammography and ultrasound are not conclusive or MRI is contraindicated or not available.

1 July 2020 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ONOlga Nigro
Olga Nigro
GPGraziella Pinotti
Graziella Pinotti
FGFederica De Galitiis
Federica De Galitiis
FPFrancesca Romana Di Pietro
Francesca Romana Di Pietro
RGRaffaele Giusti
Raffaele Giusti
ACAlessio Cortellini
Alessio Cortellini

1 January 2018 in Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMatteo Suter
Matteo Suter
OPOlivia Pagani
Olivia Pagani
Despite breast cancer being uncommon in young women, it is still the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women aged 15–39 years, and the leading cause of death in this age group in high-income countries, after accidents and self-injury. The present review summarizes the most recent guidelines and offers an expert perspective on the many challenges associated with treatment of young women with breast cancer. We will especially focus on early breast cancer, exploring the specificities of the diagnostic process, imaging techniques, locoregional and systemic treatments, and the added value of dedicated multidisciplinary teams. Specific differences in adjuvant treatment between premenopausal and postmenopausal women, especially regarding endocrine therapy, will be addressed in detail. Research questions and current gaps in important fields, such as the paucity of age-specific data regarding antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (anti-HER2) therapy and gene panels such as OncotypeDX or MAMMAPRINT will be highlighted. A consistent part of this review is dedicated to the issues defining ‘young women’, such as fertility preservation, managing long-term side effects of oncological treatments and genetic counselling, by detailing current strategies and future perspectives.