Ann Marie Hibbert

Dr. Ann Marie Hibbert


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2017 in Financial Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
IPIvelina Pavlova
Ivelina Pavlova

3 March 2024 in Journal of Banking & Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BABusra Agcayazi
Busra Agcayazi
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
TMThibaut G. Morillon
Thibaut G. Morillon

7 July 2011 in Financial Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
IPIvelina Pavlova
Ivelina Pavlova
JBJoel Barber
Joel Barber
KDKrishnan Dandapani
Krishnan Dandapani

1 September 2020 in Journal of Banking & Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKrishnan Dandapani
Krishnan Dandapani
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
ELEdward R. Lawrence
Edward R. Lawrence

4 January 2022 in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARenee Oyotode - Adebile
Renee Oyotode - Adebile
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
SSSiddharth Shankar
Siddharth Shankar

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNathan Burks
Nathan Burks
AFAdetokunbo Fadahunsi
Adetokunbo Fadahunsi
AHAnn Marie Hibbert
Ann Marie Hibbert
The primary purpose of the study is to identify and measure the properties of asset bubbles, volatility clustering, and financial contagion during three recent financial market anomalies that originated in the U.S. and Chinese markets. In particular, we focus on the 2000 DotCom Bubble, the 2008 Housing Crisis, and the 2015 Chinese Bubble. We employ three main empirical methods; the LPPL model to identify asset bubbles, the DCC-GARCH model to measure volatility clustering, and the Diebold-Yilmaz volatility spillover index to measure the level of financial contagion. We provide robust evidence that during the DotCom bubble there was very limited spillover between the S&P 500, the Shanghai, and the Shenzhen Composite Indexes. However, there was significantly more spillover effects in the two more recent crises, i.e., the Housing crisis and the 2015 Chinese Bubble. Together, these results highlight the fact that as financial markets have become more globalized, there are greater levels of volatility transmission and correspondingly fewer potential benefits from international diversification.