The role of regulatory light chains (RLCs) in cardiac muscle function has been elucidated progressively over the past decade. The RLCs are among the earliest expressed markers during cardiogenesis and persist through adulthood. Failing hearts have shown reduced RLC phosphorylation levels and that restoring baseline levels of RLC phosphorylation is necessary for generating optimal force of muscle contraction. The signalling mechanisms triggering changes in RLC phosphorylation levels during disease progression remain elusive. Uncovering this information may provide insights for better management of heart failure patients. Given the cardiac chamber-specific expression of RLC isoforms, ventricular RLCs have facilitated the identification of mature ventricular cardiomyocytes, opening up possibilities of regenerative medicine. This review consolidates the standing of RLCs in cardiac development and disease and highlights knowledge gaps and potential therapeutic advancements in targeting RLCs.

Background and Objectives: Spine surgery has undergone significant advancements, particularly with regard to robotic systems that enhance surgical techniques and improve patient outcomes. As these technologies become increasingly integrated into surgical practice, it is essential to evaluate their added value and cost savings. Hence, this study compared robot-assisted and navigation-based spine surgery, focusing on surgical efficiency. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing single- and double-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgeries. Patients were divided into two groups: those who had robot-assisted and navigation-based surgeries, stratified by surgery type (TLIF or OLIF) and fusion levels (one or two). A comparative analysis of factors related to surgical efficiency, including operative duration, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, was conducted. Results: Our results showed a statistically significant reduction in operative duration for robot-assisted one- and two-level OLIF cases, with average time savings of 50 and 62 min, respectively, compared to navigation-based surgery. These time savings translated to an estimated cost reduction of SGD 1500 for the hospital for each patient for a two-level OLIF procedure and could be higher as the number of operated levels increase. Conclusions: These results indicated that robot-assisted spine surgery offers superior surgical efficiency and cost savings, particularly with increased numbers of surgical levels. As robotic technologies evolve, their integration into spine surgery is justified, promising improved patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness.