Majid Galoie

Dr. Majid Galoie


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2021 in Environment, Development and Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jihui FanJihui Fan
Jihui Fan
AMArtemis Motamedi
Artemis Motamedi
MGMajid Galoie
Majid Galoie

30 July 2020 in Hydrology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJihui Fan
Jihui Fan
MGMajid Galoie
Majid Galoie
AMArtemis Motamedi
Artemis Motamedi
JHJing Huang
Jing Huang
The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of land cover resolution, in comparison with the digital elevation model (DEM) resolution, on hydrological modeling outputs. Three different basins in the various resolutions of DEM (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 500 and 1,000 m) and land-use maps (250, 1,000 and 2,500 m) were collected in this study, and the hydrological modeling process was performed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The soil type resolution was 1,000 m for all basins, and the runoff modeling was done based on the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method. The final model outputs showed that the DEM cell size variations affect significantly the topographical characteristics of a catchment such as area, mean slope, river network and time to concentration which alter the flood modeling outputs especially in hilly watersheds (mean slope more than 15%) up to 15% for a DEM cell size of 1,000 m in comparison to 12.5 m. Also, the resolution and spatial distribution of land cover maps which directly specify SCS-CN values, can change the output simulated runoff results up to 49% for a land cover cell size of 2,500 m in comparison to 250 m. These results indicated that the quality of the land cover map is more important than the quality of DEM in hydrological modeling. Also, the results showed that for an identical land-use cell size, the differences between model outputs using DEM cell sizes less than 100 m were not very significant. Furthermore, in all models by increasing the DEM cell size, the simulated runoff depth was decreased.

16 August 2021 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMajid Galoie
Majid Galoie
FKFouad Kilanehei
Fouad Kilanehei
AMArtemis Motamedi
Artemis Motamedi
Mohammad Nazari-SharabianMohammad Nazari-Sharabian
Mohammad Nazari-Sharabian

1 September 2021 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMahdi Moudi
Mahdi Moudi
MGMajid Galoie
Majid Galoie
HYHe Yuan
He Yuan
AMArtemis Motamedi
Artemis Motamedi
PHPing Huang
Ping Huang
MSMohsin Shafi
Mohsin Shafi


28 March 2023 in Journal of Hydro-environment Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMahdi Moudi
Mahdi Moudi
MGMajid Galoie
Majid Galoie
YHYuan He
Yuan He
XHXu Hong
Xu Hong
MSMohsin Shafi
Mohsin Shafi
AMArtemis Motamedi
Artemis Motamedi