Background: More and more heart failure (HF) patients aged ≥ 75 years undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, however the data regarding the outcomes and their predictors are scant. We investigated the mid- to long-term outcomes and their predictors in CRT patients aged ≥ 75 years. Methods: Patients in the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Modular (CRT MORE) Registry were divided into three age-groups: 80 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Over long-term follow-up (1020 days (IQR 680-1362)) mortality was higher in patients ≥ 75 years than in the other two groups. Hospitalization and composite event rates were similar in patients ≥ 75 years and those aged 65–74 (9 vs. 11.8%; p = 0.26, and 26.7 vs. 20.5%; p = 0.06). Conclusion: Positive clinical response and hospitalization rates do not differ between CRT recipients ≥ 75 years and those aged 65–74. However, age > 80 years, COPD and CKD are predictors of worse outcomes.

Background: The recently published Expert Consensus Statement on the Practical Management of Remote Device Clinic offers evidence-based recommendations for managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Purpose: We examined data from a remote monitoring (RM) database to evaluate adherence to RM recommendations in current clinical practice. Methods: According to RM guidelines, patients should be enrolled within 2 weeks of implantation for earlier detection of actionable events, and in any case, within 3 months, as it is associated with improved survival. Continuous connectivity should be maintained. In patients with continuous connectivity, alert-based RM may replace structured intermittent device follow-up. We analyzed data from 4427 CIED patients followed on the LATITUDE (Boston Scientific) remote network at 20 Italian centers. Patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2023, with a median RM duration of 37 months (25th-75th percentile: 21-60). Results: The number of patients enrolled at the centers significantly increased during the observation period (Figure). In the overall RM population, we identified a group of patients (56%) enrolled after implantation (within 6 months) and a group of patients enrolled late during their follow-up. In the first group, RM receiver activation occurred within 2 weeks in 62% and within 3 months in 90% of patients. The second group consisted mainly of patients not yet in RM at the time of COVID-19 outbreak and included to allow RM of all patients at the centers. Overall, 96% of enrolled patients performed remote data transmissions during the observation period. As of the July 2023 data extraction, 1405 (33%) patients were not monitored, with no significant differences among CIED types (CRT-D: 37%; ICD: 32%; S-ICD: 32; Pacemaker: 30%). Most not-monitored patients (30%) had not transmitted data for over a year, likely due to patient death, CIED extraction, or other irreversible causes. For the remaining 3%, the recent loss of connection (occurring within a timeframe shorter than the scheduled transmission interval) should have prompted interventions to restore connection. Scheduled device transmissions occurred at least once every 3 months in 94% of patients. Considering individual device programming, the 2836 patients with consistent connectivity performed 25,281 scheduled transmissions in one year. Conclusions: In current clinical practice, RM adoption is continually increasing, with generally observed adherence to post-implantation patient enrollment recommendations. However, a significant proportion of patients may activate RM earlier. Centers must implement solutions to ensure transmission continuity in a substantial percentage of patients. Nevertheless, the workload generated by this activity could be effectively balanced by adopting an alert-based RM strategy and reducing unnecessary scheduled transmissions.Enrolled patients trend

Background: Achieving a high biventricular pacing percentage (BiV%) is crucial for optimizing outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The HeartLogic index, a multiparametric heart failure (HF) risk score, incorporates implantable defibrillator (ICD)-measured variables and has demonstrated its predictive ability for impending HF decompensation. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between daily BiV% in CRT ICD patients and their HF status, assessed using the HeartLogic algorithm. Methods: The HeartLogic algorithm was activated in 306 patients across 26 centers, with a median follow-up of 26 months (25th–75th percentile: 15-37). Results: During the follow-up period, 619 HeartLogic alerts were recorded in 186 patients. Overall, daily values associated with the best clinical status (highest first heart sound, intrathoracic impedance, patient activity; lowest combined index, third heart sound, respiration rate, night heart rate) were associated with a BiV% exceeding 99%. We identified 455 instances of BiV% dropping below 98% after consistent pacing periods. Longer episodes of reduced BiV% (hazard ratio: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.02-9.72; P=0.045) and lower BiV% (hazard ratio: 3.97; 95% CI: 1.74-9.06; P=0.001) were linked to a higher risk of HeartLogic alerts. BiV% drops exceeding 7 days predicted alerts with 90% sensitivity (95% CI [74%-98%]) and 55% specificity (95% CI [51%-60%]), while BiV% ≤96% predicted alerts with 74% sensitivity (95% CI [55%-88%]) and 81% specificity (95% CI [77%-85%]). Conclusions: A clear correlation was observed between reduced daily BiV% and worsening clinical conditions, as indicated by the HeartLogic index. Importantly, even minor reductions in pacing percentage and duration were associated with an increased risk of HF alerts.Time to event

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of the interventional catheter-based treatment of atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, persistent pulmonary vein isolation is difficult to achieve, and up to 70% of pulmonary vein reconnection rate has been documented (1). Atrial mapping during pacing from CS in combination with LAT (local activation time) mapping may help to identify these residual gaps (2). Methods: We collected data from consecutive radiofrequency (RF) redo PVI procedures performed in our center from 01/01/2022 to 01/10/2023. Re-isolation was obtained based on bipolar map and Local Activation Time (LAT) map during pacing from distal coronary sinus (CS) -table 1 for the workflow-. We compared data obtained from analysis of bipolar maps and LAT maps; "discrepancy" between bipolar map and LAT map was defined as a difference which may lead to a different approach to the ablation strategy (figure 1); then, we compared procedural timing (radiofrequency time, fluoroscopy time, and skin-to-skin time) with our historical cohort of RF redo PVI procedures (01/01/2011 – 31/12/2021). Results: We performed 34 radiofrequency redo procedure from 01/01/2022 to 01/10/2023. In 13 out of 112 veins treated (11.6%), we observed discrepancy between bipolar map and LAT map. We observed a lower radiofrequency time for patients treated on the basis of LAT map (01-01-2022 – 01-10-2022) when compared with our historical cohort (1023.21 ± 521.51 sec vs 1358.50 +/- 746.53 sec, p= 0.038); no differences were found in terms of skin-to-skin time and fluoroscopy time. Conclusions: To perform a LAT map during pacing from distal CS may help to better identify residual gaps in redo AF procedures, allowing a reduction in radiofrequency time, without increasing skin to skin time and fluoroscopy time.Discrepancy between bipolar and LAT map

Catheter ablation is widely performed for the treatment of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias; however, specific recommendations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for femoral-access procedures are lacking in current international guidelines, resulting in substantial practice variability. Although infectious complications are rare, severe events such as infective endocarditis and septic complications have been reported and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. At the same time, increasing concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance challenge the indiscriminate use of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk settings, underscoring the need for a more selective and rational approach. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence on infectious complications related to femoral-access catheter ablation and electrophysiological studies. In the absence of prospective data, indirect evidence and biological plausibility were integrated to inform clinical decision-making. Based on multidisciplinary collaboration, we propose a pragmatic, risk-based institutional protocol that discourages routine prophylaxis in low-risk patients while allowing selective antibiotic use in predefined high-risk scenarios. This framework aims to balance patient safety with antimicrobial stewardship and may help reduce unwarranted variability in contemporary electrophysiology practice.