Differences in genetic molecular features including mutation, copy number alterations and DNA methylation, can explain interindividual variability in response to anti-cancer drugs in cancer patients. However, identifying genetic alteration-driven genes and characterizing their functional mechanisms in different cancer types are still major challenges for cancer studies. Here, we systematically identified functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes and their potential prognostic roles in breast cancer. We identified two mutation and copy number-driven gene pairs (PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3), three DNA methylation-driven gene pairs (PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-PODXL2 and PRLR-SRD5A3), six gene pairs between mutation-driven genes and drug target genes (SLC19A1-SLC47A2, SLC19A1-SRD5A3, AKR1C3-SLC19A1, ABCB1-SRD5A3, NR3C2-SRD5A3 and AKR1C3-SRD5A3), and four copy number-driven gene pairs (ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3, SLC39A11-SRD5A3 and GALNT2-SRD5A3) that all served as prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer. In particular, RARP1 was found to be upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation. Copy number deletion and downregulated expression of ACSL1 and upregulation of SRD5A3 both were observed in breast cancers. Moreover, copy number deletion of ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to PARP inhibitors. PARP1-ACSL1 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer owing to the suppression of the MAPK, mTOR and NF-kB signaling pathways, which induces apoptosis, autophagy and prevents inflammatory processes. Loss of SRD5A3 expression was also associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The PARP1-SRD5A3 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer through regulating androgen receptors to induce cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs might serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis of breast cancer and facilitate the identification of combination therapeutic targets for breast cancers.

Interaction between tumor cells and immune cells determined highly heterogeneous microenvironments across patients, leading to substantial variation in clinical benefits from immunotherapy. Somatic gene mutations were found not only to elicit adaptive immunity but also to influence the composition of tumor immune microenvironment and various processes of antitumor immunity. However, due to an incomplete view of associations between gene mutations and immunophenotypes, how tumor cells shape the immune microenvironment and further determine the clinical benefit of immunotherapy is still unclear. To address this, we proposed a computational approach, inference of mutation effect on immunophenotype by integrated gene set enrichment analysis (MEIGSEA), for tracing back the genomic factor responsible for differences in immunophenotypes. MEIGSEA was demonstrated to accurately identify the previous confirmed immune-associated gene mutations, and systematic evaluation in simulation data further supported its performance. We used MEIGSEA to investigate the influence of driver gene mutations on the infiltration of 22 immune cell types across 19 cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The top associated gene mutations with infiltration of CD8 T cells, such as CASP8, KRAS and EGFR, also showed extensive impact on other immune components; meanwhile, immune effector cells shared critical gene mutations that collaboratively contribute to shaping distinct tumor immune microenvironment. Furthermore, we highlighted the predictive capacity of gene mutations that are positively associated with CD8 T cells for the clinical benefit of immunotherapy. Taken together, we present a computational framework to help illustrate the potential of somatic gene mutations in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment.

Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are major contributors to cancer development that are pervasive and highly heterogeneous in human cancers. However, the driver roles of SCNAs in cancer are insufficiently characterized. We combined network propagation and linear regression models to design an integrative strategy to identify driver SCNAs and dissect the functional roles of SCNAs by integrating profiles of copy number and gene expression in lower-grade glioma (LGG). We applied our strategy to 511 LGG patients and identified 98 driver genes that dysregulated 29 cancer hallmark signatures, forming 143 active gene-hallmark pairs. We found that these active gene-hallmark pairs could stratify LGG patients into four subtypes with significantly different survival times. The two new subtypes with similar poorest prognoses were driven by two different gene sets (one including EGFR, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, INFA8, and INFA5, and the other including CDK4, AVIL, and DTX3), respectively. The SCNAs of the two gene sets could disorder the same cancer hallmark signature in a mutually exclusive manner (including E2F_TARGETS and G2M_CHECKPOINT). Compared with previous methods, our strategy could not only capture the known cancer genes and directly dissect the functional roles of their SCNAs in LGG, but also discover the functions of new driver genes in LGG, such as IFNA5, IFNA8, and DTX3. Additionally, our method can be applied to a variety of cancer types to explore the pathogenesis of driver SCNAs and improve the treatment and diagnosis of cancer.

Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) contributed to the progression, treatment resistance, and relapse of glioblastoma (GBM). However, current researches on GSCs were performed usually outside the human tumor microenvironment, ignoring the importance of the cellular states of primary GSCs. In this study, we leveraged single-cell transcriptome sequencing data of 6 independent GBM cohorts from public databases, and combined lineage and stemness features to identify primary GSCs. We dissected the cell states of GSCs and correlated them with the clinical outcomes of patients. As a result, we constructed a cellular hierarchy where GSCs resided at the center. In addition, we identified and characterized 2 different and recurrent GSCs subpopulations: proliferative GSCs (pGSCs) and quiescent GSCs (qGSCs). The pGSCs showed high cell cycle activity, indicating rapid cell division, while qGSCs showed a quiescent state. Then we traced the processes of tumor development by pseudo-time analysis and tumor phylogeny, and found that GSCs accumulated throughout the whole tumor development period. During the process, pGSCs mainly contributed to the early stage and qGSCs were enriched in the later stage. Finally, we constructed an 8-gene prognostic signature reflecting pGSCs activity and found that patients whose tumors were enriched for the pGSC signature had poor clinical outcomes. Our study highlights the primary GSCs heterogeneity and its correlation to tumor development and clinical outcomes, providing the potential targets for GBM treatment.

Background: Cellular states of different immune cells can affect the activity of the whole immune microenvironment. Methods: Here, leveraging reference profiles of microenvironment cell states that were constructed based on single-cell RNA-seq data of melanoma, we dissected the composition of microenvironment cell states across 463 skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) bulk samples through CIBERSORT-based deconvolution of gene expression profiles and revealed high heterogeneity of their distribution. Correspondence analysis on the estimated cellular fractions of melanoma bulk samples was performed to identify immune phenotypes. Based on the publicly available clinical survival and therapy data, we analyzed the relationship between immune phenotypes and clinical outcomes of melanoma. Results: By analysis of the relationships among those cell states, we further identified three distinct tumor microenvironment immune phenotypes: “immune hot/active”, “immune cold-suppressive” and “immune cold-exhausted”. They were characterized by markedly different patterns of cell states: most notably the CD8 T Cytotoxic state, CD8 T Mixed state, B non-regulatory state and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), depicting distinct types of antitumor immune response (or immune activity). These phenotypes had prognostic significance for progression-free survival and implications in response to immune therapy in an independent cohort of anti-PD1 treated melanoma patients. Conclusions: The proposed strategy of leveraging single-cell data to dissect the composition of microenvironment cell states in individual bulk tumors can also extend to other cancer types, and our results highlight the importance of microenvironment cell states for the understanding of tumor immunity.

Background Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly, malignant tumor of the primary central nervous system. Patients diagnosed with this type of tumor have a poor prognosis. Lymphocyte activation plays important roles in the development of cancers and its therapeutic treatments. Objective We sought to identify an efficient lymphocyte activation-associated gene signature that could predict the progression and prognosis of GBM. Methods We used univariate Cox proportional hazards regression and stepwise regression algorithm to develop a lymphocyte activation-associated gene signature in the training dataset (TCGA, n = 525). Then, the signature was validated in two datasets, including GSE16011 (n = 150) and GSE13041 (n = 191) using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to adjust for clinicopathological factors. Results We identified a lymphocyte activation-associated gene signature (TCF3, IGFBP2, TYRO3 and NOD2) in the training dataset and classified the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with significant differences in overall survival (median survival 15.33 months vs 12.57 months, HR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.28–1.87], log-rank test P < 0.001). This signature showed similar prognostic values in the other two datasets. Further, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models analysis indicated that the signature was an independent prognostic factor for GBM patients. Moreover, we determined that there were differences in lymphocyte activity between the high- and low-risk groups of GBM patients among all datasets. Furthermore, the lymphocyte activation-associated gene signature could significantly predict the survival of patients with certain features, including IDH-wildtype patients and patients undergoing radiotherapy. In addition, the signature may also improve the prognostic power of age. Conclusions In summary, our results suggested that the lymphocyte activation-associated gene signature is a promising factor for the survival of patients, which is helpful for the prognosis of GBM patients.