Mark van Barele

Mr. Mark van Barele

Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 May 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMark van Barele
Mark van Barele
BHBernadette Heemskerk-Gerritsen
Bernadette Heemskerk-Gerritsen
YLYvonne V. Louwers
Yvonne V. Louwers
MVMijntje B. Vastbinder
Mijntje B. Vastbinder
JMJohn W.M. Martens
John W.M. Martens
AJAgnes Jager
Agnes Jager
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) occur more frequently in younger women and do not express estrogen receptor (ER) nor progesterone receptor (PR), and are therefore often considered hormone-insensitive. Treatment of premenopausal TNBC patients almost always includes chemotherapy, which may lead to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and can severely impact quality of life. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is contraindicated for patients with a history of hormone-sensitive breast cancer, but the data on safety for TNBC patients is inconclusive, with a few randomized trials showing increased risk-ratios with wide confidence intervals for recurrence after HRT. Here, we review the literature on alternative pathways from the classical ER/PR. We find that for both estrogens and progestogens, potential alternatives exist for exerting their effects on TNBC, ranging from receptor conversion, to alternative receptors capable of binding estrogens, as well as paracrine pathways, such as RANK/RANKL, which can cause progestogens to indirectly stimulate growth and metastasis of TNBC. Finally, HRT may also influence other hormones, such as androgens, and their effects on TNBCs expressing androgen receptors (AR). Concluding, the assumption that TNBC is completely hormone-insensitive is incorrect. However, the direction of the effects of the alternative pathways is not always clear, and will need to be investigated further.

9 August 2021 in Menopause
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMark van Barele
Mark van Barele
CBChistien C.M. Buis
Chistien C.M. Buis
MZMonique M.A. Brood-Van Zanten
Monique M.A. Brood-Van Zanten
HDH. (Lena) C. van Doorn
H. (Lena) C. van Doorn
KGKatja N. Gaarenstroom
Katja N. Gaarenstroom
CBCurt W. Burger
Curt W. Burger
Objective: To compare the effect of tibolone to conjugated estrogens with medroxyprogesterone-acetate (CEE + MPA) on breast density, as a predictor for breast cancer risk, in women with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Methods: Women aged 30-50 (N = 114) who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) were randomized to tibolone or CEE + MPA. Results: Breast density decreased 46% after RRSO in untreated women, 39% after treatment with tibolone, and 17% after treatment with CEE + MPA; the decrease in breast density after CEE + MPA was significantly different compared with that of untreated women (P = 0.017). Conclusions: A decline in breast density is seen after premenopausal RRSO despite the use of both CEE + MPA or tibolone, although lower breast density is seen after tibolone use.