Simerjeet Kaur

Prof. Dr. Simerjeet Kaur

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
RKRamanjit Kaur
Ramanjit Kaur
Bhagirath ChauhanBhagirath Chauhan
Bhagirath Chauhan

10 May 2021 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRamanpreet Kaur
Ramanpreet Kaur
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
JDJasdev Singh Deol
Jasdev Singh Deol
RSRajni Sharma
Rajni Sharma
TKTarundeep Kaur
Tarundeep Kaur
OCOm Parkash Choudhary
Om Parkash Choudhary
The rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS) has substantially contributed in making India self-sufficient in food grain production; however, rice residue management is of great concern, threatening the sustainability of this system. Rice residue is invariably disposed of by farmers through open burning. In addition to environmental pollution, residue burning of rice also leads to loss of soil nutrients. One of the alternatives to overcome these problems and sustain the RWCS is managing the rice residues in the field itself. Rice residue retention has variable effects on agricultural pests (namely, weeds, insect pests, diseases, and rodents) in the RWCS. High weed infestation in the RWCS results in high consumption of herbicides, which leads to several ecological problems and evolution of herbicide resistance. The shift from intensive tillage to conservation tillage causes major changes in weed dynamics and herbicide efficacy. Incorporation of rice residue reduces weed density and helps in improving soil physical, chemical, and biological properties. Rice residue retention on the surface or mulching reduces weed density and the biomass of both grass and broadleaf weeds in wheat crop as compared to its removal. Long-term field studies involving the use of rice residue as a component of integrated weed management strategies are needed to be done in the RWCS.

1 June 2015 in HortTechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMakhan S. Bhullar
Makhan S. Bhullar
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
TKTarundeep Kaur
Tarundeep Kaur
AJAmit J. Jhala
Amit J. Jhala
Potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) is one of four major food crops in the world. Weed control is a major component in potato production and has been accomplished using different methods, including but not limited to the use of herbicides and straw mulch. A combination of preemergence herbicide and straw mulch may improve weed control; however, no information is available for combining both methods, along with their effects on weed control, weed density, and potato tuber yields. The objective of this study was to evaluate weed control in potato using atrazine or straw mulch applied alone at different rates or in combination. A field experiment was conducted for 4 years from 2006 to 2010 in Ludhiana, Punjab, India. Common weeds included burclover ( Medicago arabica ), common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album ), littleseed canarygrass ( Phalaris minor ), purple nutsedge ( Cyperus rotundus ), scarlet pimpernel ( Anagallis arvensis ), swinecress ( Coronopus didymus ), and toothed dock ( Rumex dentatus ). Results suggested that atrazine applied alone was not very effective and resulted in 0% to 78% control depending on the weed species being investigated at 30 days after treatment (DAT). Straw mulch applied alone at any rate provided ≥90% control of toothed dock, but control of other weed species was variable. A combination of atrazine and straw mulch at any rate usually resulted in >90% weed control at 30 DAT, except for swinecress and purple nutsedge. This treatment combination also resulted in weed density as low as 0 plant/m 2 for common lambsquarters, scarlet pimpernel, and toothed dock. Potato tuber weight and yield was significantly higher in all treatments compared with untreated control without difference among them. It is concluded that a combination of straw mulch and atrazine can provide effective weed control in potato.

1 May 2016 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMakhan Singh Bhullar
Makhan Singh Bhullar
SKSunny Kumar
Sunny Kumar
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
TKTarundeep Kaur
Tarundeep Kaur
JSJasvir Singh
Jasvir Singh
GGGurjeet Gill
Gurjeet Gill

21 June 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnkur Chaudhary
Ankur Chaudhary
RCRajender Singh Chhokar
Rajender Singh Chhokar
SDSachin Dhanda
Sachin Dhanda
Prashant KaushikPrashant Kaushik
Prashant Kaushik
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
SPSatbir Singh Punia
Satbir Singh Punia
Herbicide resistance in weeds is a global threat to sustaining food security. In India, herbicide-resistant Phalaris minor was the major problem in wheat for more than two decades, but the continuous use of metsulfuron-methyl (an ALS inhibitor) to control broadleaf weeds has resulted in the evolution of ALS inhibitor-resistant Rumex dentatus L. This review summarizes the current scenario of herbicide resistance in R. dentatus, along with its ecology and management perspectives. Studies have provided valuable insights on the emergence pattern of R. dentatus under different environments in relation to tillage, cropping systems, nutrients, and irrigation. Moreover, R. dentatus has exhibited higher emergence under zero tillage, with high infestation levels in rice-wheat compared to other wheat-based cropping systems (sorghum-wheat). Alternative herbicides for the management of resistant R. dentatus include pendimethalin, 2,4-D, carfentrazone, isoproturon, and metribuzin. Although the pre-emergence application of pendimethalin is highly successful in suppressing R. dentatus, but its efficiency is questionable under lower field soil moisture and heavy residue load conditions. Nevertheless, the biological data may be utilized to control R. dentatus. Therefore, herbicide rotation with suitable spray techniques, collecting weed seeds at differential heights from wheat, crop rotation, alternate tillage practices, and straw retention are recommended for addressing the resistance issue in R. dentatus in North India conditions. Overall, we discuss the current state of herbicide resistance in R. dentatus, the agronomic factors affecting its population, its proliferation in specific cropping systems (rice-wheat), and management strategies for containing an infestation of a resistant population.

1 January 2017 in Indian Journal of Weed Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSimerjeet Kaur
Simerjeet Kaur
TKTarundeep Kaur
Tarundeep Kaur
MBMakhan S. Bhullar
Makhan S. Bhullar
The field efficacy of pre-and post-emergence herbicides for control of mixed weed flora in wheat was evaluated in a field study conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during Rabi seasons of 2014–15 and 2015–16. The season long growth of weeds reduced wheat yield upto 38.5%. Pendimethalin and metribuzin recorded 65–73 and 73–78% control of Phalaris minor, respectively and their tank-mix application enhanced P. minor control to 78–85%. Pendimethalin and metribuzin recorded 26–33 and 5863% control of Medicago denticulata, respectively and their tank-mix application enhanced control to 77–92% of this weed. Pendimethalin and metribuzin provided control of Rumex dentatus to the extent of 98–100% and 68–92%, respectively, while provided 98–100 and 63–72%, respectively control of C. album. Sequential application of pendimethalin as pre-emergence followed by sulfosulfuron as post-emergence recorded the highest weed control efficiency (96%) and wheat grain yield (4.8 t/ha), and it was at par to pre-emergence pendimethalin + metribuzin, post-emergence pinoxaden + metsulfuron, mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron, sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron and two hand weeding.