Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are new types of personalized treatment of relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer harboring mutations. Ovarian clear cell cancer (CCC), a subset of ovarian cancer, often appears as low-stage disease with a higher incidence among Japanese. Advanced CCC is highly aggressive with poor patient outcome. The aim of the present study was to determine the potential synthetic lethality gene pairs for PARP inhibitions in patients with CCC through virtual and biological screenings as well as clinical studies. We conducted a literature review for putative PARP sensitivity genes that are associated with the CCC pathophysiology. Previous studies identified a variety of putative target genes from several pathways associated with DNA damage repair, chromatin remodeling complex, PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, Notch signaling, cell cycle checkpoint signaling, -associated complex and Fanconi's anemia susceptibility genes that could be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets for PARP inhibition. , , , , , , , , , , , , and were considered as candidate genes for synthetic lethality gene partners for PARP interactions. When considering the biological background underlying PARP inhibition, we hypothesized that PARP inhibitors would be a novel synthetic lethal therapeutic approach for CCC tumors harboring homologous recombination deficiency and activating oncogene mutations. The results showed that the majority of CCC tumors appear to have indicators of DNA repair dysfunction similar to those in -mutation carriers, suggesting the possible utility of PARP inhibitors in a subset of CCC.
The present review focuses on the current status of molecular pathology in high‑grade serous cancer (HGSC) and preneoplastic conditions. This article reviews the English‑language literature on HGSC, precursor, fallopian tubal epithelium, secretory cells, ciliated cells, secretory cell expansion, secretory cell outgrowth (SCOUT), p53 signature, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), DNA damage and immunohistochemistry in an effort to identify the precursor‑carcinoma sequence in HGSC. The majority of HGSC originates from the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube secretory epithelial cells, while the small part of this disease may develop from ovarian cortical inclusion cyst (CIC). A series of morphological changes from normal fallopian epithelium to preneoplastic to neoplastic lesions were concomitant with the multistep accumulation of molecular and genetic alterations. Recent studies provide a stepwise progression of fallopian tubal epithelium to precursor lesions to carcinoma, with the aid of a ‘secretory cell‑SCE‑SCOUT‑p53 signature‑STIC‑HGSC sequence’ model. Immunohistochemical markers, including p53, STMN1, EZH2, CCNE1, Ki67 and γ‑H2AX, were gradually increased during the SCOUT‑p53 signature‑STIC‑HGSC sequence. Conversely, PAX2 expression was decreased during the early phase of SCOUT development. Potential genes and proteins are involved in the evolutionary trajectory of the precursor‑cancer lineage model. In the present review we examined detailed aspects of the molecular changes involved in malignant transformation from fallopian tube epithelium to HGSC. A precursor condition originating in ‘field cancerization’ may gain a growth advantage, leading to HGSC.
Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry provides a noninvasive tool to discriminate between ovarian endometrioma (OE) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC), with a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 94%, respectively. MRI models that can measure R2 values are limited, and the R2 values differ between MRI models. This study aims to extract the factors contributing to the R2 value, and to make a formula for estimating the R2 values, and to assess whether the R2 predictive index calculated by the formula could discriminate EAOC from OE. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at our institution from November 2012 to February 2019. A total of 247 patients were included in this study. Patients with benign ovarian tumors mainly received laparoscopic surgery, and the patients suspected of having malignant tumors underwent laparotomy. Information from a chart review of the patients’ medical records was collected. Results: In the investigative cohort, among potential factors correlated with the R2 value, multiple regression analyses revealed that tumor diameter and CEA could predict the R2 value. In the validation cohort, multivariate analysis confirmed that age, CRP, and the R2 predictive index were the independent factors. Conclusions: The R2 predictive index is useful and valuable to the detection of the malignant transformation of endometrioma.