This study assessed three commercially available cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extraction kits and the impact of a PEG-based DNA cleanup procedure (DNApure) on cfDNA quality and yield. Six normal donor urine and plasma samples and specimens from four pregnant (PG) women carrying male fetuses underwent extractions with the JBS cfDNA extraction kit (kit J), MagMAX Cell-Free DNA Extraction kit (kit M), and QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (kit Q). Recovery of a PCR product spike-in, endogenous TP53, and Y-chromosome DNA was used to assess kit performance. Nucleosomal-sized DNA profiles varied among the kits, with prominent multi-nucleosomal-sized peaks present in urine and plasma DNA isolated by kits J and M only. Kit J recovered significantly more spike-in DNA than did kits M or Q (p < 0.001) from urine, and similar amounts from plasma (p = 0.12). Applying DNApure to kit M- and Q-isolated DNA significantly improved the amplification efficiency of spike-in DNA from urine (p < 0.001) and plasma (p ≤ 0.013). Furthermore, kit J isolated significantly more Y-chromosome DNA from PG urine compared to kit Q (p = 0.05). We demonstrate that DNApure can provide an efficient means of improving the yield and purity of cfDNA and minimize the effects of pre-analytical biospecimen variability on liquid biopsy assay performance.
Background & Aims: Continued limitations in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening have led to late diagnosis with poor survival, despite well-defined high-risk patient populations. Our aim is to develop a non-invasive urine circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) biomarker panel for HCC screening to aid in early detection. Methods: Candidate ctDNA biomarkers was prescreened in urine samples obtained from HCC, cirrhosis, and hepatitis patients. Then, 609 patient urine samples with HCC, cirrhosis, or chronic hepatitis B were collected from five academic medical centers and evaluated by serum alpha feto-protein (AFP) and urine ctDNA panel using logistic regression, a Two-Step machine learning algorithm, and iterated 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Mutated TP53 , and methylated RASSF1a and GSTP1 , were selected for the urine ctDNA panel. The sensitivity of AFP-alone (9.8 ng/mL cut-off) to detect HCC was 71% by Two-Step. The combination of ctDNA and AFP increased the sensitivity to 81% at a specificity of 90%. The AUROC for the combination of ctDNA and AFP vs . AFP-alone were 0.925 (95% CI, 0.924-0.925) and 0.877 (95% CI, 0.876-0.877), respectively. Notably, among the patients with AFP <20 ng/mL, the combination panel correctly identified 64% of HCC cases. The panel performed superiorly to AFP-alone in early-stage HCC (BCLC A) with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity. In an iterated 10-fold cross-validation analysis, the AUROC for the combination panel was 0.898 (95% CI, 0.895-0.901). Conclusions: The combination of urine ctDNA and serum AFP can increase HCC detection rates including in those patients with low-AFP. Given the ease of collection, a urine ctDNA panel could be a potential non-invasive HCC screening test.