(1) Background: Astrocytic gliomas present overlapping appearances in conventional MRI. Supplementary techniques are necessary to improve preoperative diagnostics. Quantitative DWI via the computation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms has proven valuable for tumor characterization and prognosis in this regard. Thus, this study aimed to investigate (I) the potential of ADC histogram analysis (HA) for distinguishing low-grade gliomas (LGG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG) and (II) whether those parameters are associated with Ki-67 immunolabelling, the isocitrate-dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutation profile and the methylguanine-DNA-methyl-transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation profile; (2) Methods: The ADC-histograms of 82 gliomas were computed. Statistical analysis was performed to elucidate associations between histogram features and WHO grade, Ki-67 immunolabelling, IDH1 and MGMT profile; (3) Results: Minimum, lower percentiles (10th and 25th), median, modus and entropy of the ADC histogram were significantly lower in HGG. Significant differences between IDH1-mutated and IDH1-wildtype gliomas were revealed for maximum, lower percentiles, modus, standard deviation (SD), entropy and skewness. No differences were found concerning the MGMT status. Significant correlations with Ki-67 immunolabelling were demonstrated for minimum, maximum, lower percentiles, median, modus, SD and skewness; (4) Conclusions: ADC HA facilitates non-invasive prediction of the WHO grade, tumor-proliferation rate and clinically significant mutations in case of astrocytic gliomas.
Background: Low-grade gliomas (LGG) in adults are usually slow growing and frequently asymptomatic brain tumors, originating from glial cells of the central nervous system (CNS). Although regarded formally as “benign” neoplasms, they harbor the potential of malignant transformation associated with high morbidity and mortality. Their complex and unpredictable tumor biology requires a reliable and conclusive presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A promising and emerging MRI approach in this context is histogram based apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) profiling, which recently proofed to be capable of providing prognostic relevant information in different tumor entities. Therefore, our study investigated whether histogram profiling of ADC distinguishes grade I from grade II glioma, reflects the proliferation index Ki-67, as well as the IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) mutation and MGMT (methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase) promotor methylation status. Material and Methods: Pre-treatment ADC volumes of 26 LGG patients were used for histogram-profiling. WHO-grade, Ki-67 expression, IDH mutation, and MGMT promotor methylation status were evaluated. Comparative and correlative statistics investigating the association between histogram-profiling and neuropathology were performed. Results: Almost the entire ADC profile (p25, p75, p90, mean, median) was significantly lower in grade II vs. grade I gliomas. Entropy, as second order histogram parameter of ADC volumes, was significantly higher in grade II gliomas compared with grade I gliomas. Mean, maximum value (ADCmax) and the percentiles p10, p75, and p90 of ADC histogram were significantly correlated with Ki-67 expression. Furthermore, minimum ADC value (ADCmin) was significantly associated with MGMT promotor methylation status as well as ADC entropy with IDH-1 mutation status. Conclusions: ADC histogram-profiling is a valuable radiomic approach, which helps differentiating tumor grade, estimating growth kinetics and probably prognostic relevant genetic as well as epigenetic alterations in LGG.
Meningiomas are the most frequently diagnosed intracranial masses, oftentimes requiring surgery. Especially procedure-related morbidity can be substantial, particularly in elderly patients. Hence, reliable imaging modalities enabling pretherapeutic prediction of tumor grade, growth kinetic, realistic prognosis, and-as a consequence-necessity of surgery are of great value. In this context, a promising diagnostic approach is advanced analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data. Therefore, our study investigated whether histogram profiling of routinely acquired postcontrast T1-weighted images is capable of separating low-grade from high-grade lesions and whether histogram parameters reflect Ki-67 expression in meningiomas. Pretreatment T1-weighted postcontrast volumes of 44 meningioma patients were used for signal intensity histogram profiling. WHO grade, tumor volume, and Ki-67 expression were evaluated. Comparative and correlative statistics investigating the association between histogram profile parameters and neuropathology were performed. None of the investigated histogram parameters revealed significant differences between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas. However, significant correlations were identified between Ki-67 and the histogram parameters skewness and entropy as well as between entropy and tumor volume. Contrary to previously reported findings, pretherapeutic postcontrast T1-weighted images can be used to predict growth kinetics in meningiomas if whole tumor histogram analysis is employed. However, no differences between distinct WHO grades were identifiable in out cohort. As a consequence, histogram analysis of postcontrast T1-weighted images is a promising approach to obtain quantitative in vivo biomarkers reflecting the proliferative potential in meningiomas.