Bruno Santos

Dr. Bruno Santos

Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Air Transport and Operations, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2020 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QDQichen Deng
Qichen Deng
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos
RCRichard Curran
Richard Curran

1 January 2015 in Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos
SLSabine Limbourg
Sabine Limbourg
JCJoana S. Carreira
Joana S. Carreira

25 August 2023 in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ITIordanis Tseremoglou
Iordanis Tseremoglou
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos

1 January 2008 in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos
António Pais AntunesAntónio Pais Antunes
António Pais Antunes
EMEric J. Miller
Eric J. Miller
The traditional approach to the road network design problem focuses on the optimization of network efficiency under a given budget. Generally, this leads to the improvement of roads next to the largest population centers, where travel demand is higher. Such results are not consistent with sustainable development principles, since the dissimilarities between the welfare of large and small centers will tend to increase. Nevertheless, equity issues were rarely taken into account in road network design. Moreover, all existing studies rely on a single equity measure. In this paper equity concerns in transportation planning are reviewed briefly, and a comparison of alternative equity measures is presented. Three equity measures were selected and incorporated into an accessibility-maximization road network design model. The three equity measures reflect different perspectives on equity: accessibility to low-accessibility centers, the dispersion of accessibility values across all centers (Gini coefficient), and the dispersion of accessibility values across all centers and across centers in the same region (Theil index). The implications of adopting each of these equity measures are illustrated through application of the optimization model to three random networks.

1 May 2020 in Computers & Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JVJ. Vink
J. Vink
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos
Wim J.C. VerhagenWim J.C. Verhagen
Wim J.C. Verhagen
IMI. Medeiros
I. Medeiros
RFR. Filho
R. Filho

1 August 2017 in Journal of Air Transport Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Bruno SantosBruno Santos
Bruno Santos
MWMaarten M.E.C. Wormer
Maarten M.E.C. Wormer
TAThomas A.O. Achola
Thomas A.O. Achola
RCRichard Curran
Richard Curran
This paper deals with the Airline Delay Management Problem (ADMP), which can be described as the task of dealing with daily airline operational delays and deciding whether to delay subsequent flights at a hub airport or to have them departing on time. An innovative integer linear programming approach is presented to the capacitated case of the ADMP and airport limitations in terms of bay availability, taxiway capacity and runway separation are incorporated to represent capacity constraints. Fuel cost, passenger compensation, and passenger inconvenience costs are included in the objective function. The decision variables include the re-timing of flight departures and arrivals, the use of the airport capacity over time and the rebooking of passengers in case of missed connections. To guarantee the linearity of the optimization model and fast computational times, a receding horizon modeling framework is adopted. The approach is applied to a case study using real operational and passenger data from an international hub-and-spoke carrier. The case study shows the capability of the linear model to deal with a complete day of operations within a few minutes. The results suggest that the proposed approach can lead to cost reductions of almost 30% during recovery, when compared with the solution from the airline. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is provided to investigate the impact of not including passenger inconvenience costs and of reducing runway capacity.Aerospace Transport & OperationsEducation A