Omar El Shahawy

Dr. Omar El Shahawy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJaimie P. Meyer
Jaimie P. Meyer
KIKrystyna Isaacs
Krystyna Isaacs
OSOmar El Shahawy
Omar El Shahawy
ABA. Kathleen Burlew
A. Kathleen Burlew
WWWendee Wechsberg
Wendee Wechsberg

18 September 2021 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TOTemidayo Siyanbola Omolaoye
Temidayo Siyanbola Omolaoye
OSOmar El Shahawy
Omar El Shahawy
BSBongekile T. Skosana
Bongekile T. Skosana
TBThomas Boillat
Thomas Boillat
TLTom Loney
Tom Loney
SPStefan S Du Plessis
Stefan S Du Plessis
Despite the association between tobacco use and the harmful effects on general health as well as male fertility parameters, smoking remains globally prevalent. The main content of tobacco smoke is nicotine and its metabolite cotinine. These compounds can pass the blood-testis barrier, which subsequently causes harm of diverse degree to the germ cells. Although controversial, smoking has been shown to cause not only a decrease in sperm motility, sperm concentration, and an increase in abnormal sperm morphology, but also genetic and epigenetic aberrations in spermatozoa. Both animal and human studies have highlighted the occurrence of sperm DNA-strand breaks (fragmentation), genome instability, genetic mutations, and the presence of aneuploids in the germline of animals and men exposed to tobacco smoke. The question to be asked at this point is, if smoking has the potential to cause all these genetic aberrations, what is the extent of damage? Hence, this review aimed to provide evidence that smoking has a mutagenic effect on sperm and how this subsequently affects male fertility. Additionally, the role of tobacco smoke as an aneugen will be explored. We furthermore aim to incorporate the epidemiological aspects of the aforementioned and provide a holistic approach to the topic.

26 December 2020 in Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BABennett Allen
Bennett Allen
OSOmar El Shahawy
Omar El Shahawy
ERErin Rogers
Erin Rogers
SHSarah E. Hochman
Sarah E. Hochman
MKMaria R Khan
Maria R Khan
NKNoa Krawczyk
Noa Krawczyk
Evidence suggests that individuals with history of substance use disorder (SUD) are at increased risk of COVID-19, but little is known about relationships between SUDs, overdose and COVID-19 severity and mortality. This study investigated risks of severe COVID-19 among patients with SUDs. We conducted a retrospective review of data from a hospital system in New York City. Patient records from 1 January to 26 October 2020 were included. We assessed positive COVID-19 tests, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and death. Descriptive statistics and bivariable analyses compared the prevalence of COVID-19 by baseline characteristics. Logistic regression estimated unadjusted and sex-, age-, race- and comorbidity-adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for associations between SUD history, overdose history and outcomes. Of patients tested for COVID-19 (n = 188 653), 2.7% (n = 5107) had any history of SUD. Associations with hospitalization [AORs (95% confidence interval)] ranged from 1.78 (0.85–3.74) for cocaine use disorder (COUD) to 6.68 (4.33–10.33) for alcohol use disorder. Associations with ICU admission ranged from 0.57 (0.17–1.93) for COUD to 5.00 (3.02–8.30) for overdose. Associations with death ranged from 0.64 (0.14–2.84) for COUD to 3.03 (1.70–5.43) for overdose. Patients with histories of SUD and drug overdose may be at elevated risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

1 December 2021 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBEllen Boakye
Ellen Boakye
OOOlufunmilayo H. Obisesan
Olufunmilayo H. Obisesan
SUS.M. Iftekhar Uddin
S.M. Iftekhar Uddin
OSOmar El Shahawy
Omar El Shahawy
ODOmar Dzaye
Omar Dzaye
MBMichael J. Blaha
Michael J. Blaha

OSOmar El Shahawy
Omar El Shahawy
RBRichard Brown
Richard Brown
JLJennifer Elston Lafata
Jennifer Elston Lafata
We explored primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) beliefs and practices about e-cigarettes. Cross-sectional, semi-structured interviews with PCPs in 2014 were conducted and audio-recorded. Participants were 15 general internal and family medicine physicians practicing in two settings in Virginia, USA. Interview recordings were transcribed, and the content analyzed using the Constant Comparative Method to identify key themes regarding PCPs’ reported current practices and beliefs. Five themes were identified: (1) existing clinic processes do not include mechanisms to screen for noncombustible tobacco products (such as e-cigarettes); (2) e-cigarette discussions are becoming commonplace with patients initiating the discussions and seeking physician guidance regarding e-cigarette use; (3) a lack of knowledge regarding the potential harms and benefits of e-cigarettes, yet a willingness to support their patients’ desire to use e-cigarettes (4) believing e-cigarettes are a safer alternative to smoking combustible tobacco products; and (5) abandoning concerns regarding the potential harms of e-cigarettes in the context of highly addicted patients and those with extensive comorbidities. Despite acknowledging limited knowledge regarding e-cigarettes, findings suggest that some PCPs are currently recommending e-cigarettes to their patients for smoking cessation and relative harm reduction, often personalizing recommendations based on the patient’s perceived addiction level and current health status. Physicians need to be informed about the evolving evidence regarding the risks and benefits of e-cigarettes.

5 January 2018 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAbdishakur Abdulle
Abdishakur Abdulle
AAAbdullah Alnaeemi
Abdullah Alnaeemi
AAAbdullah Aljunaibi
Abdullah Aljunaibi
AAAbdulrahman Al Ali
Abdulrahman Al Ali
KSKhaled Al Saedi
Khaled Al Saedi
RARaghib Ali
Raghib Ali
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is faced with a rapidly increasing burden of non-communicable diseases including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The UAE Healthy Future study is a prospective cohort designed to identify associations between risk factors and these diseases amongst Emiratis. The study will enroll 20,000 UAE nationals aged ≥18 years. Environmental and genetic risk factors will be characterized and participants will be followed for future disease events. As this was the first time a prospective cohort study was being planned in the UAE, a pilot study was conducted in 2015 with the primary aim of establishing the feasibility of conducting the study. Other objectives were to evaluate the implementation of the main study protocols, and to build adequate capacity to conduct advanced clinical laboratory analyses. Seven hundred sixty nine UAE nationals aged ≥18 years were invited to participate voluntarily in the pilot study. Participants signed an informed consent, completed a detailed questionnaire, provided random blood, urine, and mouthwash samples and were assessed for a series of clinical measures. All specimens were transported to the New York University Abu Dhabi laboratories where samples were processed and analyzed for routine chemistry and hematology. Plasma, serum, and a small whole blood sample for DNA extraction were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C for future analyses. Overall, 517 Emirati men and women agreed to participate (68% response rate). Of the total participants, 495 (95.0%), 430 (82.2%), and 492 (94.4%), completed the questionnaire, physical measurements, and provided biological samples, respectively. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment and completion of the study protocols for the first large-scale cohort study designed to identify emerging risk factors for the major non-communicable diseases in the region.