Beth Feingold

Dr. Beth Feingold

Department of Environmental Health Sciences and co-Director, Institute for Health and the Environment; School of Public Health, University at Albany (State University of New York), 1 University Pl, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 September 2015 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJesper Larsen
Jesper Larsen
APAndreas Petersen
Andreas Petersen
MSMarit Sørum
Marit Sørum
MSMarc Stegger
Marc Stegger
LALieke van Alphen
Lieke van Alphen
RSRobert Leo Skov
Robert Leo Skov
Livestock constitutes a potential reservoir of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates belonging to a recently derived lineage within clonal complex 398 (MRSA CC398-IIa). Since its discovery in the early 2000s, this lineage has become a major cause of human disease in Europe, posing a serious public health challenge in countries with intensive livestock production. To retrace the history of human colonisation and infection with MRSA CC398-IIa in Denmark, we conducted a nationwide, retrospective study of MRSA isolates collected from 1999 to 2011. Among 7,429 MRSA isolates screened, we identified 416 MRSA CC398-IIa isolates. Of these, 148 were from people with infections, including 51 from patients reporting no livestock exposure. The first cases of MRSA CC398-IIa infection in Denmark occurred in 2004. Subsequently, the incidence of MRSA CC398-IIa infection showed a linear annual increase of 66% from 2004 to 2011 (from 0.09 to 1.1 per 100,000 person-years). There were clear temporal and spatial relationships between MRSA CC398-IIa-infected patients with and without livestock exposure. These findings suggest substantial dissemination of MRSA CC398-IIa from livestock or livestock workers into the Danish community and underscore the need for strategies to control its spread both on and off the farm.

19 December 2014 in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah E. Diringer
Sarah E. Diringer
BFBeth Feingold
Beth Feingold
EOErnesto J. Ortiz
Ernesto J. Ortiz
JGJohn A. Gallis
John A. Gallis
JAJulio M. Araújo-Flores
Julio M. Araújo-Flores
HHHeileen Hsu-Kim
Heileen Hsu-Kim
Artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) is a major contributor to deforestation and the largest anthropogenic source of atmospheric mercury worldwide. Despite significant information on the direct health impacts of mercury to ASGM miners, the impact of mercury contamination on downstream communities has not been well characterized, particularly in Peru's Madre de Dios region. In this area, ASGM has increased significantly since 2000 and has led to substantial political and social controversy. This research examined the spatial distribution and transport of mercury through the Madre de Dios River with distance from ASGM activity. This study also characterized risks for dietary mercury exposure to local residents who depend on fish from the river. River sediment, suspended solids from the water column, and fish samples were collected in 2013 at 62 sites near 17 communities over a 560 km stretch of the Madre de Dios River and its major tributaries. In areas downstream of known ASGM activity, mercury concentrations in sediment, suspended solids, and fish within the Madre de Dios River were elevated relative to locations upstream of mining. Fish tissue mercury concentrations were observed at levels representing a public health threat, with greater than one-third of carnivorous fish exceeding the international health standard of 0.5 mg kg−1. This study demonstrates that communities located hundreds of kilometers downstream of ASGM activity, including children and indigenous populations who may not be involved in mining, are at risk of dietary mercury exposure that exceed acceptable body burdens. This report represents the first systematic study of the region to aid policy decision-making related to ASGM activities in Peru.

1 January 2021 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YOYetunde Omolayo
Yetunde Omolayo
BFBeth Feingold
Beth Feingold
RNRoni A. Neff
Roni A. Neff
XRXiaobo Xue Romeiko
Xiaobo Xue Romeiko

1 November 2021 in Current Developments in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MNMeredith Niles
Meredith Niles
ABAlyssa W Beavers
Alyssa W Beavers
LCLauren A Clay
Lauren A Clay
MDMarcelle M Dougan
Marcelle M Dougan
GPGiselle A Pignotti
Giselle A Pignotti
KYKathryn Yerxa
Kathryn Yerxa
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic profoundly affected food systems including food security. Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted food security is important to provide support and identify long-term impacts and needs. The National Food Access and COVID research Team (NFACT) was formed to assess food security over different US study sites throughout the pandemic, using common instruments and measurements. This study presents results from 18 study sites across 15 states and nationally over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A validated survey instrument was developed and implemented in whole or part through an online survey of adults across the sites throughout the first year of the pandemic, representing 22 separate surveys. Sampling methods for each study site were convenience, representative, or high-risk targeted. Food security was measured using the USDA 6-item module. Food security prevalence was analyzed using ANOVA by sampling method to assess statistically significant differences. Respondents (n = 27,168) indicate higher prevalence of food insecurity (low or very low food security) since the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with before the pandemic. In nearly all study sites, there is a higher prevalence of food insecurity among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), households with children, and those with job disruptions. The findings demonstrate lingering food insecurity, with high prevalence over time in sites with repeat cross-sectional surveys. There are no statistically significant differences between convenience and representative surveys, but a statistically higher prevalence of food insecurity among high-risk compared with convenience surveys. This comprehensive study demonstrates a higher prevalence of food insecurity in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. These impacts were prevalent for certain demographic groups, and most pronounced for surveys targeting high-risk populations. Results especially document the continued high levels of food insecurity, as well as the variability in estimates due to the survey implementation method.

1 November 2012 in Emerging Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BFBeth Feingold
Beth Feingold
ESEllen K. Silbergeld
Ellen K. Silbergeld
FCFrank C. Curriero
Frank C. Curriero
BCBrigite A.G.L. van Cleef
Brigite A.G.L. van Cleef
MHMax E.O.C. Heck
Max E.O.C. Heck
JKJan A.J.W. Kluytmans
Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans
To determine whether persons living in areas of high animal density are at increased risk for carrying livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA), we used an existing dataset of persons in the Netherlands with LA-MRSA carriage and controls who carried other types of MRSA. Results of running univariate and multivariate logistic regression models indicated that living in livestock-dense areas increases the odds of nasal carriage of LA-MRSA. We found that doubling pig, cattle, and veal calf densities per municipality increased the odds of LA-MRSA carriage over carriage of other types of MRSA by 24.7% (95% CI 0.9%-54.2%), 76.9% (95% CI 11.3%-81.3%), and 24.1% (95% CI 5.5%-45.9%), respectively, after adjusting for direct animal contact, living in a rural area, and the probable source of MRSA carriage. Controlling the spread of LA-MRSA thus requires giving attention to community members in animal-dense regions who are unaffiliated with livestock farming.

8 September 2015 in Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMatthew O. Gribble
Matthew O. Gribble
RKRoxanne Karimi
Roxanne Karimi
BFBeth Feingold
Beth Feingold
JNJennifer F. Nyland
Jennifer F. Nyland
TOTodd M. O'Hara
Todd M. O'Hara
CCCelia Y. Chen
Celia Y. Chen
Humans who eat fish are exposed to mixtures of healthful nutrients and harmful contaminants that are influenced by environmental and ecological factors. Marine fisheries are composed of a multitude of species with varying life histories, and harvested in oceans, coastal waters and estuaries where environmental and ecological conditions determine fish exposure to both nutrients and contaminants. Many of these nutrients and contaminants are thought to influence similar health outcomes (i.e., neurological, cardiovascular, immunological systems). Therefore, our understanding of the risks and benefits of consuming seafood require balanced assessments of contaminants and nutrients found in fish and shellfish. In this paper, we review some of the reported benefits of fish consumption with a focus on the potential hazards of mercury exposure, and compare the environmental variability of fish oils, selenium and mercury in fish. A major scientific gap identified is that fish tissue concentrations are rarely measured for both contaminants and nutrients across a range of species and geographic regions. Interpreting the implications of seafood for human health will require a better understanding of these multiple exposures, particularly as environmental conditions in the oceans change.