Routing in intermittently connected mobile ad hoc networks (ICMAN) is a very challenging problem because disconnections are prevalent and the lack of knowledge about network dynamics hinders good decision making. In ICMAN one of the most important decisions is how to choose the most suitable intermediate(s) to forward the message to the destination. We propose in this document a new algorithm (PROPICMAN) that, based on context information, allows the sender to select the neighbor(s) such that the message has the highest probability to reach the destination.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) continue to demonstrate substantial capabilities in solving a wide range of optical-network-related tasks such as fault management, resource allocation, and lightpath quality of transmission (QoT) estimation. However, the focus of the research community has been centered on ML models’ predictive capabilities, neglecting aspects related to models’ understanding, i.e., to interpret how the model reasons and makes its predictions. This lack of transparency hinders the understanding of a model’s behavior and prevents operators from judging, and hence trusting, the model’s decisions. To mitigate the lack of transparency and trust in ML, explainable AI (XAI) frameworks can be leveraged to explain how a model correlates input features to its outputs. In this paper, we focus on the application of XAI to lightpath QoT estimation. In particular, we exploit Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) as the XAI framework. Before presenting our analysis, we provide a brief overview of XAI and SHAP, then discuss the benefits of the application of XAI in networking and survey studies that apply XAI to networking tasks. Then, we model the lightpath QoT estimation problem as a supervised binary classification task to predict whether the value of the bit error rate associated with a lightpath is below or above a reference acceptability threshold and train an ML extreme gradient boosting model as the classifier. Finally, we demonstrate how to apply SHAP to extract insights about the model and to inspect misclassifications.

Proprietary public APIs play a crucial and growing role as research tools among social scientists. Among such APIs, Google's machine learning-based Perspective API is extensively utilized for assessing the toxicity of social media messages, providing both an important resource for researchers and automatic content moderation. However, this paper exposes an important bias in Perspective API concerning German language text. Through an in-depth examination of several datasets, we uncover intrinsic language biases within the multilingual model of Perspective API. We find that the toxicity assessment of German content produces significantly higher toxicity levels than other languages. This finding is robust across various translations, topics, and data sources, and has significant consequences for both research and moderation strategies that rely on Perspective API. For instance, we show that, on average, four times more tweets and users would be moderated when using the German language compared to their English translation. Our findings point to broader risks associated with the widespread use of proprietary APIs within the computational social sciences.

The kick-off of vaccination campaigns in Europe, starting in late December 2020, has been followed by the online spread of controversies and conspiracies surrounding vaccine validity and efficacy. We study Twitter discussions in three major European languages (Italian, German, and French) during the vaccination campaign. Moving beyond content analysis to explore the structural aspects of online discussions, our investigation includes an analysis of polarization and the potential formation of echo chambers, revealing nuanced behavioral and topical differences in user interactions across the analyzed countries. Notably, we identify strong anti- and pro-vaccine factions exhibiting heterogeneous temporal polarization patterns in different countries. Through a detailed examination of news-sharing sources, we uncover the widespread use of other media platforms like Telegram and YouTube for disseminating low-credibility information, indicating a concerning trend of diminishing news credibility over time. Our findings on Twitter discussions during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in major European languages expose nuanced behavioral distinctions, revealing the profound impact of polarization and the emergence of distinct anti-vaccine and pro-vaccine advocates over time.