Yuancheng Guo

Mr. Yuancheng Guo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 March 2024 in Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMudassir Mehmood
Mudassir Mehmood
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
LWLei Wang
Lei Wang
Yunlong LiuYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu
BUBantayehu Uba Uge
Bantayehu Uba Uge
SASharafat Ali
Sharafat Ali

4 May 2021 in Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
CLChenyu Lv
Chenyu Lv
SHSiqiang Hou
Siqiang Hou
YLYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu
The rigid long-short-pile composite foundation has been increasingly used as an effective and low-cost reinforcement method. The pile-soil interaction in this foundation type is more complicated than that in the equal-length pile composite foundation. In this study, several physical model tests were conducted to investigate the pile-soil synergistic mechanism of the rigid long-short-pile composite foundation. A comparative analysis was conducted of the static load test data of single-pile and long-short pile composite foundations to assess the load-bearing characteristics and stiffness evolution of the composite foundation and pile-soil unit. The result indicated a positive correlation between the pile length and the overall bearing capacity of the single-pile composite foundation. The overall stiffness of the four-pile composite foundation was lower than that of the single-pile composite foundation due to an increase in the areas of the soil stress and the pull-down effect caused by multiple piles. The long pile exerted a greater influence on the overall settlement than the short pile. In addition, the correction coefficients were obtained to determine the pile-soil stiffness of the four-pile composite foundation based on that of the single-pile composite foundation, providing a theoretical reference for the optimal design of composite foundations.

15 November 2023 in Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMudassir Mehmood
Mudassir Mehmood
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
Yunlong LiuYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu
BUBantayehu Uba Uge
Bantayehu Uba Uge

15 October 2023 in Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BUBantayehu Uba Uge
Bantayehu Uba Uge
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
JZJun Zhao
Jun Zhao
YLYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu

1 January 2021 in Advances in Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BUBantayehu Uba Uge
Bantayehu Uba Uge
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
YLYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu
The stress and displacement boundary conditions of excavation retaining structures affect the deformation mechanism and movement of the retained soil mass. The soil movement disturbs the load sharing performance and structural integrity of cement‐fly ash‐gravel (CFG) pile composite foundations existing in the vicinity, which merits considerable research work. This article presents results from 3D finite element analyses performed to study the influence of retaining wall rotation on the load sharing characteristics of adjacent CFG pile composite foundation comprising long and short piles. To verify the numerical model, a relatively large‐scale 1 g physical model test was conducted. It is revealed that to arrive at a new static equilibrium during progression of wall rotation, the percentage load sharing ratios of the long and short piles change increasingly while the load proportion carried by the upper soil reduces remarkably. The percentage load sharing characteristics of CFG pile composite foundation are more affected in immediate proximity to the wall than those located at far distance. For the foundation having 3 × 3 long and short piles placed at 3.0–15.0 m away from the wall, the location resulted in a reduction of soil bearing capacity ranging between 1.4 and 7.5% of the total imposed load while the corresponding increase in the % load borne by the long and short pile range was 0.83–4.15 and 0.59–3.36%, respectively. For the other parameters considered in this article viz. pile spacing, subsoil stiffness, cushion stiffness and thickness, and applied working load, the increment in % load sharing of the long and short pile range was 3.45–4.15, 1.3–5.79, 1.48–3.36, 4.15–4.79, and 3.67–4.15% and 3.36–4.67, 1.43–4.99, 1.48–3.36, 3.36–3.64, and 1.38–3.36% of the imposed load, respectively. Moreover, the long piles’ load sharing proportion was higher than that of short piles, and peripheral piles received larger load proportion.

25 October 2025 in Sādhanā
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BUBantayehu Uba Uge
Bantayehu Uba Uge
YGYuancheng Guo
Yuancheng Guo
JZJun Zhao
Jun Zhao
YLYunlong Liu
Yunlong Liu
ESEskinder Desta Shumuye
Eskinder Desta Shumuye
MTMichael Hadera Tekle
Michael Hadera Tekle