In Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), oxidative stress (OS) is driven by Th1 cytokines’ response interfering with the normal function of thyrocytes. OS results from an imbalance between an excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a lowering of antioxidant production. Moreover, OS has been shown to inhibit Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), which is able to prevent hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α stabilization. The aims of this study were to determine the involvement of NADPH-oxidases (NOX), SIRT1, and HIF-1α in HT pathophysiology as well as the status of antioxidant proteins such as peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1), catalase, and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). The protein expressions of NOX2, NOX4, antioxidant enzymes, SIRT1, and HIF-1α, as well as glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), were analyzed by Western blot in primary cultures of human thyrocytes that were or were not incubated with Th1 cytokines. The same proteins were also analyzed by immunohistochemistry in thyroid samples from control and HT patients. In human thyrocytes incubated with Th1 cytokines, NOX4 expression was increased whereas antioxidants, such as PRDX1, catalase, and SOD1, were reduced. Th1 cytokines also induced a significant decrease of SIRT1 protein expression associated with an upregulation of HIF-1α, GLUT-1, and VEGF-A proteins. With the exception of PRDX1 and SOD1, similar results were obtained in HT thyroids. OS due to an increase of ROS produced by NOX4 and a loss of antioxidant defenses (PRDX1, catalase, SOD1) correlates to a reduction of SIRT1 and an upregulation of HIF 1α, GLUT-1, and VEGF-A. Our study placed SIRT1 as a key regulator of OS and we, therefore, believe it could be considered as a potential therapeutic target in HT.

Introduction The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis have been defined in clinical trials, but long-term real-life experience, essential for clinical decision-making, is still limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of upadacitinib in a real-life cohort of adults and adolescents with severe atopic dermatitis in whom previous systemic therapies largely failed. Methods Retrospective cohort study collecting data from adults and adolescents treated with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg per day between July 2021 to August 2022. The outcomes for effectiveness were evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a validated Investigator’s Global Assessment for atopic dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and/or an improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected. Results A total of 29 patients were included (22 adults and 7 adolescents), with a median follow-up of 54.4 weeks. At the end of the follow-up, 23 patients (79.3%) reached a vIGA-AD of 0/1, and 24 patients (82.7%) achieved EASI 75. Among patients treated with upadacitinib after initial failure of first- and/or second-line treatment with biologics or baricitinib, 5/7 patients (71.4%) reached a vIGA-AD score of 0/1. Disease control was slightly better in adults than in adolescents (81.8% vs 71.4% reached the efficacy endpoint, respectively). Response rate in patients with upadacitinib 15 mg seemed better than in clinical trials or network meta-analysis. Safety data were reassuring; lipid changes were the most frequent adverse event. Conclusion This real-life study confirms the effectiveness of upadacitinib, particularly for the treatment of atopic dermatitis recalcitrant to conventional systemic agents, biologics or baricitinib. Induced lipid changes require close follow-up.

Background Tralokinumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to interleukin-13, was safe and effective for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials, but real-life experience is still limited. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in severe AD in a real-life multicenter prospective cohort. Methods Adult patients with severe AD were enrolled between January 2022 and July 2022 and received tralokinumab subcutaneously for 16 weeks. Objective and subjective scores were collected at baseline, weeks 6 and 16. Adverse events were reported throughout the study. Results Twenty-one patients were included. An improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) was achieved in 66.7% of patients at week 16. The median objective and subjective scores at week 16 were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than those at baseline. Combination with cyclosporine was sometimes necessary at the beginning of treatment, and addition of upadacitinib was required for some patients with very severe disease during the treatment. The most frequent adverse events were flares of eczema (23.8%) and reactions at injection site (19.0%). No cases of conjunctivitis were reported. Four patients (19.0%) discontinued treatment. Conclusions Tralokinumab is an effective first-line biotherapy for severe AD. However, therapeutic response may be progressive. Safety data were reassuring. Atopic dermatitis flares or reactions at the injection site may lead to discontinuation of treatment. A history of conjunctivitis on dupilumab is not a contraindication to the initiation of tralokinumab.

Disseminated granuloma annulare (DGA) is an inflammatory skin disorder characterized by more than 10 erythematous, raised, ring-shaped plaques. Its treatment remains challenging, with conventional therapies showing variable efficacy. We report the case of a woman in her 50s with a 2-year history of DGA refractory to multiple treatments. Given the recent evidence of the role of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway in the granuloma annulare pathophysiology, treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg per day was started with rapid effectiveness and good tolerance. This case underscores the potential of JAK inhibitors as promising therapeutic options for recalcitrant granuloma annulare.

Granulomatous cheilitis (of Miescher) (GC), a rare nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammatory disorder, is part of the orofacial granulomatosis spectrum.^1,2 It is characterized by intermittent or persistent swelling of the upper and/or lower lip, resulting in functional disability and cosmetic impairment. Despite various hypotheses, including factors such as food allergy, genetics, infection, and atopy, its exact cause remains unknown.² Granulomatous cheilitis is an exclusion diagnosis, and most cases remain isolated; however, it can be associated with systemic diseases such as Crohn disease (CD),³ sarcoidosis, or Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome. Current treatment primarily involves topical or intralesional corticosteroids, with severe cases often requiring systemic agents such as biologics, with variable outcomes and frequent relapses.⁴ The evidenced role of the Janus kinase–signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway in granuloma formation has brought interest in using JAK inhibitors for granulomatous skin diseases⁵; to our knowledge, their effectiveness in GC remains unexplored.

Introduction The efficacy of conventional treatments for alopecia areata (AA) has been extremely variable and disappointing, with a high rate of relapse. Recent clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety of baricitinib (an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor) in alopecia areata. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and tolerance of baricitinib in alopecia areata in a real-life Belgian monocentric adult cohort. The primary outcome was evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of ≤ 20 at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected. Results In this 19-patient series, with a median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up duration of 13 ± 16.2 months, we demonstrated that: (i) hair regrowth was observed in nearly 90% of patients between 4 and 16 weeks after initiation of baricitinib; (ii) at the end of the follow-up, more than 70% and, in particular, 100% of patients with patchy AA, reached the primary outcome (SALT score ≤ 20); (iii) almost half of the patients, mostly with patchy AA, showed a complete hair regrowth (SALT score = 0), within a median ± IQR treatment time of 8.5 ± 10 months; (iv) baricitinib was discontinued in three patients with total hair regrowth, two of whom relapsed; and (v) no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion Baricitinib is effective in treating patients with alopecia areata, particularly for the patchy phenotype, but with a risk of relapse after discontinuation. Safety data are reassuring, with lipid changes being the most frequent adverse event.