Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proven to be an effective treatment strategy for a variety of malignant tumors. However, only a subset of patients can benefit from ICIs due to factors such as drug resistance. Therefore, it is crucial to identify biomarkers that can accurately predict the efficacy of ICIs and provide a basis for individualized immunotherapy. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether the chemokine interleukin 8 (IL-8) can be used as a biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs treatment.Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, to identify relevant articles published up to June 08, 2023. Our inclusion criteria were limited to cohort studies and clinical trials that reported hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the objective response rate (ORR), in cancer patients with high and low IL-8 expression. For data analysis, we used Revman to generate forest plots, subgroup analysis, and assess publication bias. Additionally, Stata was utilized for sensitivity analysis and further examination of publication bias.Results: A total of 24 datasets, involving 3190 participants, were selected from 14 studies. The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in ORR, OS, and/or PFS in the high IL-8 group after treatment with ICIs compared to the low IL-8 group.Conclusion: IL-8 can serve as a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs. Patients with lower expression of IL-8 may benefit from ICIs treatment.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=383188, identifier CRD42022383188.

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer afflicting women worldwide. Patients with breast cancer of different molecular classifications need varied treatments. Since it is known that the development of breast cancer involves multiple genes and functions, identification of functional gene modules (clusters of the functionally related genes) is indispensable as opposed to isolated genes, in order to investigate their relationship derived from the gene co-expression analysis. In total, 6315 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were recognized and subjected to the co-expression analysis. Seven modules were screened out. The blue and turquoise modules have been selected from the module trait association analysis since the genes in these two modules are significantly correlated with the breast cancer subtypes. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment show that the blue module genes engaged in cell cycle, DNA replication, p53 signaling pathway, and pathway in cancer. According to the connectivity analysis and survival analysis, 8 out of 96 hub genes were filtered and have shown the highest expression in basal-like breast cancer. Furthermore, the hub genes were validated by the external datasets and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). In summary, hub genes of Cyclin E1 (CCNE1), Centromere Protein N (CENPN), Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHEK1), Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion 1 (DSCC1), Family with sequence similarity 64, member A (FAM64A), Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 C (UBE2C) and Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 T (UBE2T) may serve as the prognostic markers for different subtypes of breast cancer.

Breast cancer is predominantly recognized as a condition affecting women, however, male breast cancer (MBC), despite its rarity, represents a significant and serious malignancy in men. Accounting for approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases, MBC is often diagnosed at a later stage compared to female breast cancer, primarily due to a lack of awareness and the absence of screening programs tailored for men. This delayed diagnosis typically results in poorer prognoses and more limited treatment options. Over the past decade, there has been a notable increase in research and awareness surrounding MBC. This surge is largely driven by the recognition of its unique epidemiological and biological characteristics, which are distinct from those of female breast cancer. However, due to its low incidence, many aspects of MBC, including its etiology, clinical presentation, and optimal treatment strategies, remain inadequately understood. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of MBC by examining its incidence, mortality rates, and epidemiological characteristics on a global scale. Additionally, it explores the economic burden associated with the disease, identifies key risk factors, and discusses current preventive measures. Finally, the paper will offer insights into future research directions and potential advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of MBC.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the outcome between MMBC and unifocal breast cancer (UFBC), in order to provide a theoretical basis for the design of an appropriate clinical therapeutic strategy of MMBC patients.Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP database were searched from inception to July 2021, and observational studies reporting the outcome of patients with MMBC and UFBC were included. We extracted or calculated the mortality rates of MMBC and UFBC patients; and obtained the hazard ratios; odds ratios; relative risks; and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals from the eligible studies. All the meta-analyses were conducted by using the Stata 15.0 software.Results: 31 eligible studies comprising a total of 15,703 individuals were included. The meta-analysis revealed that MMBC did not have a significant association with poor overall survival (HR=1.04, 95% CI=0.96-1.12), disease-free survival (HR= 1.07, 95% CI= 0.84-1.36), breast cancer-specific survival (HR=1.42, 95% CI= 0.89-2.27), recurrence-free survival (HR= 0.878, 95% CI= 0.652-1.182), local recurrence-free survival (HR= 0.90, 95% CI= 0.57-1.42), and contralateral breast cancer risk (RR= 0.908, 95% CI= 0.667-1.234). However, MMBC appeared to have a correlation with a slightly higher risk of death (OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.18-1.45).Conclusion: Patients with MMBC appeared to have a higher risk of death, however, it may not be independently associated with poorer outcomes. Considering the inter-study heterogeneity and other limitations, our results need to be validated by further multicenter prospective studies with a large sample size in the future.

An abstract is unavailable. This article is available as a PDF only.

Background: Breast cancer is a common cancer that affects women. The Luminal A subtype of breast cancer is defined by low Ki67 expression (<14%), Her-2 negative, and positive ER and PR. Luminal A exhibits a favorable prognosis compared to other breast cancer types. Materials and Methods: Gene expression profiling was employed in this investigation ...