Alessandro Rodolico

Dr. Alessandro Rodolico

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatry Unit, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 March 2020 in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTeresa Surace
Teresa Surace
LFLaura Fusar-Poli
Laura Fusar-Poli
LVLucia Vozza
Lucia Vozza
VCVito Cavone
Vito Cavone
CAChiara Arcidiacono
Chiara Arcidiacono
Eugenio AgugliaEugenio Aguglia
Eugenio Aguglia

15 October 2019 in International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMaria Cristina Costanzo
Maria Cristina Costanzo
CAChiara Arcidiacono
Chiara Arcidiacono
ARAlessandro Rodolico
Alessandro Rodolico
MPMariangela Panebianco
Mariangela Panebianco
EAEugenio Aguglia
Eugenio Aguglia
Maria Salvina SignorelliMaria Salvina Signorelli
Maria Salvina Signorelli

26 August 2020 in Molecular Autism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSpyridon Siafis
Spyridon Siafis
OÇOğulcan Çıray
Oğulcan Çıray
JSJohannes Schneider-Thoma
Johannes Schneider-Thoma
IBIrene Bighelli
Irene Bighelli
MKMarc Krause
Marc Krause
SLStefan Leucht
Stefan Leucht
Background: Placebo response in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) might dilute drug-placebo differences and hinder drug development. Therefore, this meta-analysis investigated placebo response in core symptoms. Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, WHO-ICTRP (up to July 8, 2018), and PubMed (up to July 4, 2019) for randomized pharmacological and dietary supplement placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum of seven days of treatment. Single-group meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Standardized mean changes (SMC) of core symptoms in placebo arms were the primary outcomes and placebo positive response rates were a secondary outcome. Predictors of placebo response were investigated with meta-regression analyses. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO ID CRD42019125317. Results: Eighty-six RCTs with 2360 participants on placebo were included in our analysis (87% in children/adolescents). The majority of trials were small, single-center with a duration of 8–12 weeks and published after 2009. Placebo response in social-communication difficulties was SMC = − 0.32, 95% CI [− 0.39, − 0.25], in repetitive behaviors − 0.23[− 0.32, − 0.15] and in scales measuring overall core symptoms − 0.36 [− 0.46, − 0.26]. Overall, 19%, 95% CI [16–22%] of participants were at least much improved with placebo. Caregiver (vs. clinician) ratings, lower risk of bias, flexible-dosing, larger sample sizes and number of sites, less recent publication year, baseline levels of irritability, and the use of a threshold of core symptoms at inclusion were associated with larger placebo response in at least a core symptom domain. Limitations: About 40% of the trials had an apparent focus on core symptoms. Investigation of the differential impact of predictors on placebo and drug response was impeded by the use of diverse experimental interventions with essentially different mechanisms of action. An individual-participant-data meta-analysis could allow for a more fine-grained analysis and provide more informative answers. Conclusions: Placebo response in ASD was substantial and predicted by design- and participant-related factors, which could inform the design of future trials in order to improve the detection of efficacy in core symptoms. Potential solutions could be the minimization and careful selection of study sites as well as rigorous participant enrollment and the use of measurements of change not solely dependent on caregivers.

28 February 2021 in Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLaura Fusar-Poli
Laura Fusar-Poli
ARAlessandro Rodolico
Alessandro Rodolico
SSSerena Sturiale
Serena Sturiale
BCBianca Carotenuto
Bianca Carotenuto
ANAntimo Natale
Antimo Natale
Eugenio AgugliaEugenio Aguglia
Eugenio Aguglia
Laura Fusar-Poli*, Alessandro Rodolico*, Serena Sturiale, Bianca Carotenuto, Antimo Natale, Davide Arillotta, Spyridon Siafis, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Eugenio Aguglia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2021;19:26-45. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2021.19.1.26

1 February 2024 in Frontiers in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAlessandro Rodolico
Alessandro Rodolico
PCPierfelice Cutrufelli
Pierfelice Cutrufelli
AFAntonio Di Francesco
Antonio Di Francesco
AAAndrea Aguglia
Andrea Aguglia
GCGaetano Catania
Gaetano Catania
EAEugenio Aguglia
Eugenio Aguglia
Background: Unipolar and bipolar depression present treatment challenges, with patients sometimes showing limited or no response to standard medications. Ketamine and its enantiomer, esketamine, offer promising alternative treatments that can quickly relieve suicidal thoughts. This Overview of Reviews (OoR) analyzed and synthesized systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving ketamine in various formulations (intravenous, intramuscular, intranasal, subcutaneous) for patients with unipolar or bipolar depression. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ketamine and esketamine in treating major depressive episodes across various forms, including unipolar, bipolar, treatment-resistant, and non-resistant depression, in patient populations with and without suicidal ideation, aiming to comprehensively assess their therapeutic potential and safety profile.Methods: Following PRIOR guidelines, this OoR’s protocol was registered on Implasy (ID:202150049). Searches in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos focused on English-language meta-analyses of RCTs of ketamine or esketamine, as monotherapy or add-on, evaluating outcomes like suicide risk, depressive symptoms, relapse, response rates, and side effects. We included studies involving both suicidal and non-suicidal patients; all routes and formulations of administration (intravenous, intramuscular, intranasal) were considered, as well as all available comparisons with control interventions. We excluded meta-analysis in which the intervention was used as anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy or with a randomized ascending dose design. The selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of studies were carried out by pairs of reviewers in a blinded manner. Data on efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability were extracted.Results: Our analysis included 26 SRs and 44 RCTs, with 3,316 subjects. The intervention is effective and well-tolerated, although the quality of the included SRs and original studies is poor, resulting in low certainty of evidence.Limitations: This study is limited by poor-quality SRs and original studies, resulting in low certainty of the evidence. Additionally, insufficient available data prevents differentiation between the effects of ketamine and esketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression.Conclusion: While ketamine and esketamine show promising therapeutic potential, the current evidence suffers from low study quality. Enhanced methodological rigor in future research will allow for a more informed application of these interventions within the treatment guidelines for unipolar and bipolar depression.Systematic review registration: [https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-5-0049/], identifier (INPLASY202150049).

11 June 2021 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Carmen ConcertoCarmen Concerto
Carmen Concerto
ARAlessandro Rodolico
Alessandro Rodolico
CAChiara Avanzato
Chiara Avanzato
LFLaura Fusar-Poli
Laura Fusar-Poli
Maria Salvina SignorelliMaria Salvina Signorelli
Maria Salvina Signorelli
Eugenio AgugliaEugenio Aguglia
Eugenio Aguglia
Over the last decade, internet gaming has been a fast-growing recreational activity. Gamers risk their leisure activity becoming an addiction. In the present study, we aimed to measure the prevalence of Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) in an adult population of video game players and to investigate the association between demographic variables, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) traits, Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) severity, and IGD in adults. Through an online survey, we recruited 4260 individuals aged between 18 and 55 years old, who were members of online communities of video gamers. We collected demographic data and administered three questionnaires: the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGD9-SF), the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), and the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS). Of the overall sample, 29.67% scored above the cut-off of 21 points for the IGD9-SF. Multiple linear regression models showed that daily spare time, autistic traits, and ADHD symptoms were positively associated with the severity of IGD in adults, after controlling for demographic variables. Future studies are required in order to explore factors linked to IGD in adults.